• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参考值变化在临床实验室 Delta 检验中的应用与优化。

Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong-si, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Dec;34(12):e23550. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23550. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.23550
PMID:32862477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7755783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delta check is a patient-based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV-based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV-based method were compared, and the methods were modified.

RESULTS

Reference change value-based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%).

CONCLUSIONS

Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV-based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories.

摘要

背景

Delta 检验是一种基于患者的质控工具,通过比较患者当前和以往的检测结果来检测误差。参考变化值(RCV)已被指南作为 Delta 检验的方法采用,但尚未验证其性能。我们将基于 RCV 的 Delta 检验方法应用于患者数据并进行了修改以应用。

材料和方法

使用内部质控材料和生物学变异数据计算 RCV。收集了住院患者、门诊患者和健康体检者的 17 项分析物的检测结果。比较了现行 Delta 检验方法和 RCV 法的检出率,并对方法进行了修改。

结果

与传统方法相比,基于 RCV 的方法具有更高的检出率。应用修改后降低了检出率。去除参考区间内的结果对降低检出率(0.42%10.92%)有影响。当 RCV 除以时间间隔时,其在门诊患者中的检出率与以往相似(0.19%1.34%)。使用 RCV 乘以参考值上限的两倍作为截止值可降低检出率(0.07%~1.58%)。

结论

RCV 是 Delta 检验的一个稳健标准,已包含在临床实验室实践指南中。然而,基于 RCV 的方法产生的高检出率会增加工作量。它需要在临床实验室中进行修改才能使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a7/7755783/4bdb3690aaf0/JCLA-34-e23550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a7/7755783/11d0337bed11/JCLA-34-e23550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a7/7755783/4bdb3690aaf0/JCLA-34-e23550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a7/7755783/11d0337bed11/JCLA-34-e23550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a7/7755783/4bdb3690aaf0/JCLA-34-e23550-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory.参考值变化在临床实验室 Delta 检验中的应用与优化。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Dec;34(12):e23550. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23550. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
2
Comparison of Application Biological Variation and Patient Data for Selecting Delta Check Limits.应用生物变异和患者数据选择差值检查限的比较
Clin Lab. 2020 Sep 1;66(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.191252.
3
New decision criteria for selecting delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range can be generally applicable for each clinical chemistry test item.基于 delta 差值与参考范围宽度之比选择 delta 检验方法的新决策标准通常可适用于每个临床化学检验项目。
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Sep;32(5):345-54. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.5.345. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
4
Unnecessary repeated total cholesterol tests in biochemistry laboratory.生物化学实验室中不必要的重复总胆固醇检测。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(1):77-81. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.007.
5
The preliminary study of delta checks for immunoglobulins and complements in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中免疫球蛋白和补体的delta检查初步研究。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2025 Mar;62(2):83-90. doi: 10.1177/00045632241287135. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
6
Machine learning-based delta check method for detecting misidentification errors in tumor marker tests.基于机器学习的肿瘤标志物检测中误识别错误检测的 delta 检查方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Dec 14;62(7):1421-1432. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-1185. Print 2024 Jun 25.
7
Practical delta check limits for tumour markers in different clinical settings.不同临床情况下肿瘤标志物的实用德尔塔检验限。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Mar 31;61(10):1829-1840. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1098. Print 2023 Sep 26.
8
The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation.参考变化值:基于生物学变异解读系列检测中实验室报告的一项提议。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004;64(3):175-84. doi: 10.1080/00365510410004885.
9
Clinical Application of Overlapping Confidence Intervals for Monitoring Changes in Serial Clinical Chemistry Test Results.临床化学检验结果连续监测中重叠置信区间的临床应用。
Ann Lab Med. 2020 May;40(3):201-208. doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.3.201.
10
Uncertainty of measurement for 14 immunoassay analytes: application to laboratory result interpretation.14种免疫分析物的测量不确定度:在实验室结果解读中的应用
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2019 Feb-Apr;79(1-2):117-122. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1550806. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment and application of autoverification system for HbA1c testing.糖化血红蛋白检测自动审核系统的建立与应用。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Oct 15;34(3):030705. doi: 10.11613/BM.2024.030705.
2
Prediction interval: A powerful statistical tool for monitoring patients and analytical systems.预测区间:监测患者和分析系统的强大统计工具。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Jun 15;34(2):020101. doi: 10.11613/BM.2024.020101. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory.临床实验室中变化限度(差值检查)的评估

本文引用的文献

1
To Delta Check or Not to Delta Check? That Is the Question.进行差值核对还是不进行差值核对?这就是问题所在。
J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Jan 1;1(4):457-459. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2016.022020.
2
Utility of Reference Change Values for Delta Check Limits.用于差值检查限值的参考变化值的效用。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2017 Oct 1;148(4):323-329. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx083.
3
Delta Check Practices and Outcomes: A Q-Probes Study Involving 49 Health Care Facilities and 6541 Delta Check Alerts.差值检查实践与结果:一项涉及49个医疗机构和6541次差值检查警报的Q-调查研究
Adv Lab Med. 2021 Apr 1;2(3):417-431. doi: 10.1515/almed-2020-0114. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Effective and Practical Complete Blood Count Delta Check Method and Criteria for the Quality Control of Automated Hematology Analyzers.用于自动化血液分析仪质量控制的有效且实用的全血计数差值检查方法和标准。
Ann Lab Med. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):418-424. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.418. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Jun;141(6):813-823. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0161-CP. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
New decision criteria for selecting delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range can be generally applicable for each clinical chemistry test item.基于 delta 差值与参考范围宽度之比选择 delta 检验方法的新决策标准通常可适用于每个临床化学检验项目。
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Sep;32(5):345-54. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.5.345. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
5
How useful are delta checks in the 21 century? A stochastic-dynamic model of specimen mix-up and detection.21世纪的delta检验有多大用处?样本混淆与检测的随机动态模型。
J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:5. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.93402. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
6
Multivariate delta check method for detecting specimen mix-up.用于检测样本混淆的多变量增量检查法
Clin Chem. 1982 Nov;28(11):2244-8.
7
CUMS and delta checks. A systematic approach to quality control.累积和变化检查。一种质量控制的系统方法。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Nov;62(5):707-12. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/62.5.707.
8
Rate and delta checks compared for selected chemistry tests.对选定的化学检测项目进行速率和差值检查比较。
Clin Chem. 1988 Oct;34(10):1966-70.
9
Differential application of rate and delta check on selected clinical chemistry tests.速率和差值检查在选定临床化学检验中的差异应用。
J Korean Med Sci. 1990 Dec;5(4):189-95. doi: 10.3346/jkms.1990.5.4.189.
10
Patients as their own controls: use of the computer to identify "laboratory error".以患者自身作为对照:利用计算机识别“实验室误差”。
Clin Chem. 1975 Oct;21(11):1648-53.