Unidad de Otoneurología, Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cervicofacial, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, España.
Unidad de Otoneurología, Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cervicofacial, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, España.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar-Apr;72(2):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
Differential diagnosis of vertigo is a diagnostic challenge in the emergency setting. In our centre we have created a vertigo protocol to distinguish the different pathologies and their management in the emergency department. Our goal is to determine the efficacy of our hospital protocol in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to acute vestibular syndrome.
It is a retrospective descriptive observational study on patients with a diagnosis of acute vestibular syndrome in the emergency department using our unclear origin vertigo protocol. All patients underwent an examination that included the HINTS protocol and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The results of the clinical assessments by the specialists were compared, as well as the physical examination with the different final diagnoses classified as peripheral, central and other-origin.
We obtained 97 patients, with a mean age of 61.46 years. The final diagnoses were 26 patients for the peripheral group (26.8%), 38 for the other-origin group (39.2%) and 33 for the central group (34%). Stroke was found in 18 of the latter group, clinical-exploratory disagreement being the most frequent reason for activation of the protocol.
Our protocol has proven to be a useful tool to differentiate a possible acute vestibular syndrome of central origin from a peripheral one, avoiding unnecessary imaging tests. The most frequent cause of activation of the protocol was clinical-exploratory disagreement seen by the ENT doctor.
在急诊环境中,眩晕的鉴别诊断具有挑战性。在我们中心,我们创建了一个眩晕方案,以区分不同的病理及其在急诊科的管理。我们的目标是确定我们医院方案在急性前庭综合征的诊断和治疗方法中的疗效。
这是一项回顾性描述性观察研究,研究对象为在急诊科使用我们的不明原因眩晕方案诊断为急性前庭综合征的患者。所有患者均接受了包括 HINTS 方案在内的检查,且随访时间至少为 6 个月。专家进行的临床评估结果进行了比较,同时还比较了体格检查与最终诊断为外周性、中枢性和其他来源的不同分类。
我们共获得 97 例患者,平均年龄为 61.46 岁。最终诊断为外周组 26 例(26.8%),其他来源组 38 例(39.2%),中枢组 33 例(34%)。后者组中发现 18 例为卒中,方案激活的最常见原因是临床检查意见不一致。
我们的方案已被证明是一种有用的工具,可区分可能的中枢性急性前庭综合征与外周性的,避免了不必要的影像学检查。激活方案的最常见原因是耳鼻喉科医生认为的临床检查意见不一致。