• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一期翻修治疗膝关节肠球菌假体周围感染后,新细菌再感染率高:单中心研究。

High Rate of Reinfection With New Bacteria Following One-Stage Exchange for Enterococcal Periprosthetic Infection of the Knee: A Single-Center Study.

机构信息

Department of Joint Replacement Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Complex Arthroplasty Unit, St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):711-716. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.015
PMID:32863076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A wide range of success rates following the surgical management of enterococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a tendency toward worse outcomes have been reported. However, the role of 1-stage exchange remains under-investigated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate our results after the 1-stage knee exchange for enterococcal PJI.

METHODS

Forty patients were retrospectively included between 2002 and 2017 with a mean follow-up of survivors of 80 months (range 22-172; standard deviation [SD] = 5). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 45% (18/40) of patients. Patients' characteristics, joint-related data, and antibiotic therapy were recorded. Rates of enterococcal infection relapse, reinfection with new microorganisms, and re-revision for any reason were determined. Bivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of infection recurrence.

RESULTS

Revision surgery was required in 22 cases (55%) with a mean time to revision surgery of 27 months (range 1-78; SD = 25). Indications for aseptic revisions (18%) included aseptic loosening (10%), periprosthetic fracture (5%), and patellar instability (3%). The most common cause of re-revision was a subsequent PJI (15/22; 68%) after a mean time of 22 months (range 1-77; SD = 24). Overall infection recurrence rate was 37.5% (15/40), substantially due to entirely non-enterococcal infections (9/15; 60%). Infection relapse with Enterococci occurred in 4 cases (10%) within 16 months postoperatively. Older patients (P = .05) and male gender (P = .05) were associated with a higher risk of infection recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Overcoming the Enterococci using the 1-stage exchange for knee PJI is achievable but the rate of reinfection due to new microorganisms is high . However, the overall infection recurrence rate is comparable to other treatment approaches.

摘要

背景

手术治疗肠球菌性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的成功率差异很大,结果往往较差。然而,一期置换术的作用仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们旨在评估我们对肠球菌性 PJI 进行一期膝关节置换术的结果。

方法

回顾性纳入 2002 年至 2017 年间的 40 例患者,生存患者的平均随访时间为 80 个月(范围 22-172;标准差[SD] = 5)。45%(18/40)的患者发生混合感染。记录患者特征、关节相关数据和抗生素治疗情况。确定肠球菌感染复发、新微生物再感染和任何原因再次翻修的发生率。进行二变量分析以确定感染复发的危险因素。

结果

22 例(55%)需要翻修手术,平均翻修时间为 27 个月(范围 1-78;SD = 25)。无菌性翻修的指征包括无菌性松动(10%)、假体周围骨折(5%)和髌骨不稳定(3%)。再次翻修的最常见原因是 15 例(22%)在 15 个月(范围 1-77;SD = 24)后再次发生 PJI。总体感染复发率为 37.5%(40 例中有 15 例),主要是由于完全非肠球菌感染(9/15;60%)。术后 16 个月内有 4 例(10%)出现肠球菌感染复发。年龄较大的患者(P =.05)和男性(P =.05)感染复发的风险较高。

结论

使用一期置换术治疗膝关节 PJI 可以克服肠球菌,但因新微生物引起的再感染率较高。然而,总体感染复发率与其他治疗方法相当。

相似文献

1
High Rate of Reinfection With New Bacteria Following One-Stage Exchange for Enterococcal Periprosthetic Infection of the Knee: A Single-Center Study.一期翻修治疗膝关节肠球菌假体周围感染后,新细菌再感染率高:单中心研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):711-716. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
2
What are the Factors Associated with Re-revision After One-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A Case-control Study.哪些因素与髋关节假体周围感染一期翻修术后再次翻修有关?一项病例对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2258-2263. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000780.
3
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
Periprosthetic knee infection reconstruction with a hinged prosthesis: Implant survival and risk factors for treatment failure.带铰链假体的人工膝关节周围感染重建:植入物存活率及治疗失败的危险因素。
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
High revision rates following repeat septic revision after failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后一期翻修失败的假体周围关节感染行重复清创翻修后高返修率。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):386-393. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0481.R2.
6
Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.245 例初次全膝关节置换术后无感染前期治疗的假体周围关节感染的两阶段置换协议。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):239-249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356.
7
Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection.对于膝关节假体周围感染的二期翻修,采用股骨远端置换的翻修 TKA 具有很高的再感染风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06474-2. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A High Risk of Subsequent Complications.单髁膝关节置换术后感染:后续并发症风险高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):70-77. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000372.
9
Effective single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion after multiple failed surgery for periprosthetic joint infection : a mean seven years' follow-up.关节内抗生素灌注在多次翻修术后治疗人工关节周围感染的单阶段翻修中的疗效:平均 7 年随访。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jul;104-B(7):867-874. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1704.R1.
10
Risk of Reinfection After Treatment of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.感染性全膝关节置换术治疗后再次感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Multiantibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement on the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Hip and Knee Arthroplasties-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.多抗生素负载骨水泥对髋膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的治疗效果——一项单中心回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;13(6):524. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060524.
2
A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节翻修术术前预后因素及结局指标的映射综述
Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 10;4(5):338-356. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2022-0157.R1.
3
Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature.
一期翻修治疗膝关节假体周围感染后复发性感染的特征:文献系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2703-2715. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Antimicrobial Materials for Resolution of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections .近期在评估用于解决骨科植入物相关感染的抗菌材料方面的进展
ACS Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 10;7(12):3125-3160. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00465. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee replacement: a practical surgical guide.感染性全膝关节置换的诊断与处理:实用外科指南
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Feb 22;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00333-2.