Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Mar 14;76(4):766-777. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa085.
In the United States, educational disparities in disability are large and increasing, but the mechanisms underlying them are not well understood. We estimate the proportion of population-level educational disparities in disability incidence explained by excess body mass index (BMI), smoking, and manual labor.
We use waves 2003-2015 of the nationally representative Panel Study of Income Dynamics to calculate observed disability incidence and counterfactual incidence absent the key mediators (3,129 individuals; 13,168 observations). We take advantage of earlier-life measures, including childhood socioeconomic status, 1986 BMI, and occupational history between 1968 and 2001. To account for distinct processes in women and men at middle versus older ages, we stratify by gender and at age 65.
Educational disparities in disability incidence were evident in women and men at younger and older ages, and were largest among older women. Together, the mediators of interest were estimated to explain roughly 60% of disparities in younger women, 65%-70% in younger men, 40% in older women, and 20%-60% in older men. The main contributors to disparities appeared to be excess BMI and smoking in younger women; manual labor and smoking in younger men; excess BMI in older women; and smoking in older men.
These mediators explain much of disparities in earlier-age disability; successful interventions to address these factors may substantially reduce them. However, a considerable proportion of disparities remained unexplained, particularly at older ages, reflecting the myriad pathways by which educational attainment can influence disability status.
在美国,残疾方面的教育差距很大且在不断扩大,但造成这种差距的机制尚不清楚。我们估计,人群中因超重指数(BMI)、吸烟和体力劳动而导致残疾发生率的教育差异比例。
我们使用具有全国代表性的收入动态面板研究(PSID)2003-2015 年的数据,计算观察到的残疾发生率和不存在关键中介因素的假设发生率(3129 人;13168 次观察)。我们利用早年的指标,包括儿童期社会经济地位、1986 年 BMI 和 1968 年至 2001 年期间的职业历史。为了说明女性和男性在中年和老年时不同的过程,我们按性别和 65 岁进行分层。
残疾发生率的教育差距在年轻和年老的女性和男性中均明显存在,在年老的女性中最大。我们估计,这些感兴趣的中介因素大致解释了年轻女性中 60%的差异、年轻男性中 65%-70%的差异、老年女性中 40%的差异和老年男性中 20%-60%的差异。造成差异的主要因素似乎是年轻女性的超重指数和吸烟;年轻男性的体力劳动和吸烟;老年女性的超重指数;老年男性的吸烟。
这些中介因素解释了大部分早期残疾的差异;成功干预这些因素可能会大大减少这些差异。然而,相当一部分差异仍然无法解释,特别是在老年时期,这反映了教育程度影响残疾状况的众多途径。