University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.H., R.F.).
University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany (U.R.F.).
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):375-379. doi: 10.7326/M20-0064.
After decades of silence, the German Society for Internal Medicine (DGIM) has made considerable efforts to come to terms with its role and actions during the Nazi era (1933 to 1945). This is particularly important because, with more than 27 000 members, the DGIM is the largest medical society in present-day Germany. Since 1882, the society's annual congress in Wiesbaden has provided a forum and focus for the key medical topics of the day. Based on ongoing historical research, this article is organized in 2 parts. The first describes how the DGIM willingly adapted to the ideology and politics of the Nazi regime, showing no solidarity with its persecuted Jewish members. To illustrate their fates, the cases of Leopold Lichtwitz, who was forced to resign as elected chairman in 1933, and committee member Julius Bauer are investigated. Both men emigrated to the United States. Light is also shed on the decisions of those who led the society during the Nazi era and on the involvement of high-ranking members in medical crimes. The second part of the article analyzes developments in the postwar period and considers why it took so long to hold up a mirror to the past. Although critical voices could be heard from both outside and within the society, they remained isolated and without consequence. Only the past 2 decades have brought about both general and specific developments toward historical accountability and an active culture of remembrance. With a declaration first published in 2015, a new website bringing history and memory together, and a strong commitment to the norms and values of liberal democracy, the DGIM has found its way to a clear position-and has lessons to teach.
经过几十年的沉寂,德国医学学会(DGIM)为了正视其在纳粹时期(1933 年至 1945 年)的角色和行为付出了巨大努力。这一点尤为重要,因为 DGIM 拥有超过 27000 名成员,是当今德国最大的医学协会。自 1882 年以来,该协会在威斯巴登举行的年度大会为当今的主要医学议题提供了一个论坛和焦点。基于正在进行的历史研究,本文分为两部分。第一部分描述了 DGIM 如何自愿适应纳粹政权的意识形态和政治,对其受迫害的犹太成员毫不表示声援。为了说明他们的命运,调查了 Leopold Lichtwitz 和 Julius Bauer 的案例,这两人都被迫辞去 1933 年当选的主席职务。这两人都移民到了美国。本文还探讨了那些在纳粹时期领导该协会的人的决定,以及高级成员参与医疗犯罪的问题。文章的第二部分分析了战后时期的发展,并探讨了为什么需要这么长时间才能正视过去。尽管协会内外都有批评声音,但这些声音仍然孤立无援,没有结果。只有在过去的 20 年里,才出现了对历史责任的普遍和具体发展,以及对纪念活动的积极文化。DGIM 通过 2015 年首次发表的一份宣言、一个将历史和记忆结合在一起的新网站,以及对自由民主规范和价值观的坚定承诺,找到了明确立场,并提供了教训。