Yost W A
Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Apr;83(4):1517-21. doi: 10.1121/1.395907.
Recent investigations of the masking-level difference (MLD) have often involved measurement of the MLD as a function of masker level. The results show, as had earlier work, that the size of the MLD decreases as the masker level decreases. These studies have usually not considered an earlier explanation of the dependency of the MLD on masker level, that is, that additive internal noise, which is partially interaurally uncorrelated, leads to decorrelated maskers at low levels of the external masking noise. Because maskers that are decorrelated yield small MLDs, the MLD is likewise small at low masker levels. This review article shows that this explanation provides a good fit to data obtained over the past four decades. It also shows that the MLD depends less on masker level with insert phones than with supraaural phones as would be predicted by the additive internal noise explanation and the observation of lower internal noise with the use of insert phones. It is concluded that the internal noise explanation should be considered when the MLD is measured as a function of masker level.
近期对掩蔽级差(MLD)的研究常常涉及将MLD作为掩蔽声级的函数进行测量。结果表明,和早期研究一样,随着掩蔽声级降低,MLD的大小也会减小。这些研究通常没有考虑对MLD依赖于掩蔽声级的一种早期解释,即部分耳间不相关的加性内部噪声,会导致在外部掩蔽噪声较低水平时掩蔽声去相关。由于去相关的掩蔽声产生较小的MLD,所以在低掩蔽声级时MLD同样较小。这篇综述文章表明,这种解释与过去四十年来获得的数据拟合良好。它还表明,如加性内部噪声解释以及使用插入式耳机时内部噪声较低的观察结果所预测的那样,与耳罩式耳机相比,MLD对掩蔽声级的依赖在插入式耳机中较小。得出的结论是,当将MLD作为掩蔽声级的函数进行测量时,应考虑内部噪声解释。