• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似肺栓塞的YEARS诊断算法的外部验证

External validation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism.

作者信息

Eddy Maggie, Robert-Ebadi Helia, Richardson Lydia, Bellesini Marta, Verschuren Frank, Moumneh Thomas, Meyer Guy, Righini Marc, Le Gal Grégoire

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Comox, BC, Canada.

Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Dec;18(12):3289-3295. doi: 10.1111/jth.15083. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/jth.15083
PMID:32869501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Validated diagnostic algorithms are used to manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The recently published YEARS study proposed a simplified diagnostic strategy to reduce the use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

OBJECTIVES

To externally validate this strategy in an independent cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed data from three previous prospective cohort studies of outpatients with suspected PE. We retrospectively applied the YEARS algorithm. The three YEARS clinical criteria are: clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, hemoptysis, and PE as the most likely diagnosis. If zero YEARS criteria are met, a D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL will rule out PE. If ≥1 YEARS criteria are met, a D-dimer < 500 ng/mL will rule out PE.

RESULTS

Of the 3314 patients, 731 (22.1%) had PE. Applying the YEARS diagnostic algorithm, 1423 (42.9%) patients could have had PE ruled out without imaging. Of these patients, 17 (1.2%; 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.9) were diagnosed with PE at initial testing. All 17 had no YEARS item and a D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL. All 17 had a D-dimer level above their age-adjusted cutoff. Among the 272 patients with no YEARS criteria and a D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL but above their age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff, PE was diagnosed in 6.3% (17/272; 95% confidence interval 3.9-9.8).

CONCLUSION

We provide external validation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm in an independent cohort. The rule appears to safely exclude PE. However, caution is required in patients with no YEARS item and a D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL but above their age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff.

摘要

背景

经过验证的诊断算法用于管理疑似肺栓塞(PE)的患者。最近发表的YEARS研究提出了一种简化的诊断策略,以减少计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影的使用。

目的

在一个独立队列中对该策略进行外部验证。

方法

我们分析了之前三项针对疑似PE门诊患者的前瞻性队列研究的数据。我们回顾性应用了YEARS算法。YEARS的三项临床标准为:深静脉血栓形成的临床体征、咯血以及PE为最可能的诊断。如果未满足任何一项YEARS标准,D-二聚体<1000 ng/mL可排除PE。如果满足≥1项YEARS标准,D-二聚体<500 ng/mL可排除PE。

结果

在3314例患者中,731例(22.1%)患有PE。应用YEARS诊断算法,1423例(42.9%)患者无需影像学检查即可排除PE。在这些患者中,17例(1.2%;95%置信区间0.8 - 1.9)在初始检测时被诊断为PE。所有17例均无YEARS项目且D-二聚体<1000 ng/mL。所有17例的D-二聚体水平均高于其年龄校正临界值。在272例无YEARS标准且D-二聚体<1000 ng/mL但高于其年龄校正D-二聚体临界值的患者中,6.3%(17/272;95%置信区间3.9 - 9.8)被诊断为PE。

结论

我们在一个独立队列中对YEARS诊断算法进行了外部验证。该规则似乎可以安全地排除PE。然而,对于无YEARS项目且D-二聚体<1000 ng/mL但高于其年龄校正D-二聚体临界值的患者,需要谨慎对待。

相似文献

1
External validation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism.疑似肺栓塞的YEARS诊断算法的外部验证
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Dec;18(12):3289-3295. doi: 10.1111/jth.15083. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
External validation of the PEGeD diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism in an independent cohort.对疑似肺栓塞的 PEGeD 诊断算法进行独立队列的外部验证。
Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 8;7(15):3946-3951. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007729.
3
Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.妊娠适应 YEARS 算法在疑似肺栓塞诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1139-1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813865.
4
No added value of the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to the YEARS algorithm in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.年龄调整 D-二聚体截断值对 YEARS 算法在疑似肺栓塞患者中的应用没有价值。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Dec;15(12):2317-2324. doi: 10.1111/jth.13852. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study.疑似肺栓塞简化诊断管理研究(YEARS 研究):一项前瞻性、多中心、队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):289-297. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.年龄校正 D-二聚体界值排除肺栓塞:ADJUST-PE 研究。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
7
A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?对疑似深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞的门诊患者进行深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的非侵入性诊断及排除的批判性评估:我们需要多少项检查?
Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):27-39.
8
Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.采用升高和年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略对疑似肺栓塞急诊科患者的血栓栓塞事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2141-2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.
9
A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.一种简单的决策规则,包括 D-二聚体,以减少疑似肺栓塞患者进行计算机断层扫描的需求。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Aug;13(8):1428-35. doi: 10.1111/jth.13011. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.原始 Wells 简化评分和年龄校正 D-二聚体检测排除肺栓塞:一项个体患者数据汇总分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):678-684. doi: 10.1111/jth.13630. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on the Performance of Clinical Decision-Making Algorithms for Pulmonary Embolism.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染对肺栓塞临床决策算法性能影响的比较分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7008. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237008.
2
Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the YEARS Algorithm for Pulmonary Embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于肺栓塞的YEARS算法的诊断测试准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2024 Nov;24(4):491-500. doi: 10.18295/squmj.1.2024.007. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
3
A machine learning model for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism and comparison with Wells score, revised Geneva score, and Years algorithm.
机器学习模型诊断急性肺栓塞与 Wells 评分、修订版 Geneva 评分和 Years 算法的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Mar 20;137(6):676-682. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002837. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
Diagnostic Approach for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients.癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞的诊断方法
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;15(11):3031. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113031.
5
Implementation of the YEARS algorithm to optimise pulmonary embolism diagnostic workup in the emergency department.实施 YEARS 算法优化急诊科肺栓塞诊断流程。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002119.
6
Systematic screening versus clinical gestalt in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.在急诊科对 COVID-19 患者进行肺栓塞诊断时,系统筛查与临床观察法的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283459. eCollection 2023.
7
External validation of the PEGeD diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism in an independent cohort.对疑似肺栓塞的 PEGeD 诊断算法进行独立队列的外部验证。
Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 8;7(15):3946-3951. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007729.
8
Determining the diagnostic value of three clinical criteria Wells', YEARS and modified Geneva in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism.确定Wells评分、YEARS标准和改良Geneva评分这三项临床标准对疑似肺血栓栓塞症孕妇的诊断价值。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Aug 15;12(4):240-246. eCollection 2022.