Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Center, La Rabta, Tunis, Tunisia.
Faculty of Medicine, University Tunis, El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Ultrasound. 2021 Dec;24(4):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00514-2. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
To evaluate the effect of the positioning from the supine position (SP) to the prone position (PP) on the diaphragm activity in ventilated patients; using the ultrasound (US) imaging.
A cross-sectional comparative study before/after PP was conducted on 40 ICU patients over 18 years who received invasive ventilation (IV) for at least 48 h. The considered ventilator modes were: assisted control volume with a low trigger flow (between - 2 and 2 L/mn) and pressure support mode. US diaphragmatic assessments were performed at SP and at 60 min of PP. Both End-inspiratory and End-expiratory diameters (EID/EED) were taken at 3 levels of axillary lines and determined by the average values of multiple measures. Diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) was calculated as: DTF = (EID - EED/EED) × 100. Pairing and ANOVA tests were used for comparisons.
Forty ventilated patients (42 years of median age) at 4 days [2-7] of median duration of ventilation were examined during the two positions: SP versus PP. EID decreased from the SP to the PP (2.8 mm in SP vs. 2.4 mm in PP, p = 0.001). No difference was showed regarding the expiratory thickness. Overall, DTF didn't change in PP (37.4 vs. 42.05%, p = 0.36). When the patient was placed in PP, the best DTF value was showed at the posterior part of diaphragm (posterior: 45%, median: 31% and anterior: 38%, p = 0.049).
The ventral placement in ventilated patients reduced end-inspiratory diameter and tended to decrease DTF. In PP, the best contractile activity was detected at the posterior region of diaphragm.
使用超声(US)成像评估从仰卧位(SP)到俯卧位(PP)对机械通气患者膈肌活动的影响。
对 40 名接受有创通气(IV)至少 48 小时的 18 岁以上 ICU 患者进行了前后对比的横断面研究。所考虑的通气模式为:低触发流量辅助控制容积(-2 至 2 L/min)和压力支持模式。在 SP 和 PP 后 60 分钟进行 US 膈肌评估。在腋线 3 个水平测量吸气末和呼气末直径(EID/EED),并通过多次测量的平均值确定。膈肌增厚分数(DTF)计算为:DTF=(EID-EED/EED)×100。采用配对和 ANOVA 检验进行比较。
在 SP 和 PP 两种体位下,对 40 名接受通气治疗的患者(中位年龄 42 岁)进行了检查,这些患者在接受通气治疗 4 天[2-7]的中位时间内。EID 从 SP 减少到 PP(SP 时为 2.8mm,PP 时为 2.4mm,p=0.001)。呼气末厚度无差异。总体而言,PP 中 DTF 没有变化(37.4%比 42.05%,p=0.36)。当患者被放置在 PP 中时,膈肌后部分显示出最佳的 DTF 值(后:45%,中:31%和前:38%,p=0.049)。
在通气患者中,腹侧放置会减少吸气末直径,并倾向于降低 DTF。在 PP 中,在膈肌后区域检测到最佳的收缩活性。