Department of Legal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Department of Legal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Nov;49:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102373. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is prone to failure as DNA is frequently damaged by various environmental factors; hence, increasing the number of starting templates may constitute a feasible approach to improve STR profiling success. Whole genome amplification (WGA) is often applied to bolster starting template quantity. Moreover, WGA can reportedly be used on degraded DNA samples in forensics. Therefore, we utilized a PCR-based WGA method, termed "modified improved primer extension preamplification" (mIPEP), prior to STR analysis of degraded DNA, as this method is less affected by DNA quantity and quality than most others. Saliva from four volunteers was dried on glass fiber filter papers (paper) and glass slides (glass) and irradiated with UVA light (365 nm). The mIPEP method was initiated using 5, 0.5, and 0.05 ng of DNA following DNA extraction. The DNA degradation index (DI) was calculated based on the ratio of 129 to 41 bp DNA fragments; lower numbers indicate higher degradation. Following mIPEP, STR analysis was performed using the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit. The number of detectable STR loci, with and without mIPEP, decreased according to reduced DI in a different manner for the various DNA concentrations extracted from paper and glass. Specifically, for the 5 ng DNA sample on paper, at a DI < 0.2, the number of detectable STR loci was greater with mIPEP than without it, owing to fewer locus drop-outs. Similarly, the 0.05 ng DNA sample deposited on paper, at DI ≥ 0.7, exhibited higher numbers of detectable STR loci when prepared using mIPEP owing to fewer allele drop-outs. Moreover, among samples deposited on glass, the 0.05 ng DNA sample at DI ≥ 0.4 afforded a larger number of detectable STR loci when prepared using mIPEP than those without mIPEP, owing to fewer locus drop-outs. These findings suggest that performing mIPEP in accordance with sample DNA condition (e.g., quantity and quality) may lead to increased success of STR analysis. Notably, the conditions identified as most responsive to mIPEP were consistent across both UVA-irradiated and environmentally-damaged sample states. Taken together, our results suggest that applying mIPEP would be beneficial to obtain improved STR profiles under conditions involving severely degraded samples with large quantities of DNA, or with small quantities of DNA albeit with slight degradation.
短串联重复序列(STR)分析容易失败,因为 DNA 经常受到各种环境因素的破坏;因此,增加起始模板的数量可能是提高 STR 分析成功率的一种可行方法。全基因组扩增(WGA)常用于增加起始模板数量。此外,据报道,WGA 可用于法医中降解 DNA 样本的分析。因此,我们在降解 DNA 的 STR 分析之前,使用了一种基于 PCR 的 WGA 方法,称为“改良改进引物延伸预扩增”(mIPEP),因为与大多数其他方法相比,该方法受 DNA 数量和质量的影响较小。从四名志愿者收集的唾液被干燥在玻璃纤维滤纸上(纸)和载玻片上(玻璃),并用 UVA 光(365nm)照射。在 DNA 提取后,使用 5、0.5 和 0.05ng 的 DNA 启动 mIPEP 方法。DNA 降解指数(DI)是根据 129 和 41bp DNA 片段的比值计算得出的;较低的数字表示更高的降解程度。在 mIPEP 之后,使用 AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR 扩增试剂盒进行 STR 分析。在从纸和玻璃中提取的不同浓度的 DNA 中,根据 DI 的降低,具有和不具有 mIPEP 的可检测 STR 基因座的数量以不同的方式减少。具体来说,对于纸上的 5ng DNA 样本,在 DI<0.2 时,使用 mIPEP 比不使用 mIPEP 时可检测到的 STR 基因座数量更多,因为较少出现基因座丢失。同样,在 DI≥0.7 时,在纸上沉积的 0.05ng DNA 样本,由于等位基因丢失较少,使用 mIPEP 制备时可检测到更多的 STR 基因座。此外,在沉积在玻璃上的样本中,在 DI≥0.4 时,使用 mIPEP 制备的 0.05ng DNA 样本比不使用 mIPEP 制备的样本具有更多的可检测 STR 基因座,因为较少出现基因座丢失。这些发现表明,根据样品 DNA 条件(例如,数量和质量)进行 mIPEP 可能会增加 STR 分析的成功率。值得注意的是,对 mIPEP 反应最敏感的条件在 UVA 照射和环境损伤的样品状态下是一致的。总之,我们的结果表明,在涉及大量 DNA 且严重降解的样品或 DNA 数量较少但略有降解的情况下,应用 mIPEP 将有助于获得更好的 STR 谱。