文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

微创前路腰椎椎间融合术后的腰痛结局:系统评价。

Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.

2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20385.


DOI:10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20385
PMID:32871569
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery (MIS ALIF) is a technique that restores disc height and lumbar lordosis through a smaller exposure and less soft-tissue trauma compared to open approaches. The mini-open and laparoscopic assistance techniques are two main forms of MIS ALIF. The authors conducted a systematic review that sought to critically summarize the literature on back pain following MIS ALIF. METHODS: In March 2020, the authors searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies describing back pain visual analog scale (VAS) outcomes after MIS ALIF. The following exclusion criteria were applied to studies evaluated in full text: 1) the study included fewer than 20 patients, 2) the mean follow-up duration was shorter than 12 months, 3) the study did not report back pain VAS score as an outcome measure, and 4) MIS ALIF was not studied specifically. The methodology for the included studies were evaluated for potential biases and assigned a level of evidence. RESULTS: There were a total of 552 patients included from 13 studies. The most common biases were selection and interviewer bias. The majority of studies were retrospective. The mean sample size was 42.3 patients. The mean follow-up duration was approximately 41.8 months. The mean postoperative VAS reduction was 5.1 points. The mean VAS reduction for standalone grafts was 5.9 points, and 5.0 points for those augmented with posterior fixation. The most common complications included bladder or urinary dysfunction, infection, and hardware-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: This was a systematic review of back pain outcomes following MIS ALIF. Back pain VAS score was reduced postoperatively across all studies. The complication rates were low overall. MIS ALIF is safe and effective at reducing back pain in appropriate patient populations.

摘要

目的:与开放手术相比,微创前路腰椎椎间融合术(MIS ALIF)是一种通过较小的暴露和较少的软组织创伤来恢复椎间盘高度和腰椎前凸的技术。微创和腹腔镜辅助技术是 MIS ALIF 的两种主要形式。作者进行了一项系统评价,旨在批判性地总结关于 MIS ALIF 后腰痛的文献。

方法:2020 年 3 月,作者检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以获取描述 MIS ALIF 后腰痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)结果的研究。对全文评估的研究应用了以下排除标准:1)研究纳入的患者少于 20 例,2)平均随访时间短于 12 个月,3)研究未报告腰痛 VAS 评分作为结局测量指标,4)未专门研究 MIS ALIF。对纳入研究的方法学进行了潜在偏倚评估,并分配了证据水平。

结果:共有 13 项研究的 552 例患者纳入。最常见的偏倚是选择偏倚和采访者偏倚。大多数研究为回顾性。平均样本量为 42.3 例。平均随访时间约为 41.8 个月。术后 VAS 评分平均降低 5.1 分。单纯植骨的 VAS 评分降低 5.9 分,与后路固定增强的 VAS 评分降低 5.0 分。最常见的并发症包括膀胱或尿功能障碍、感染和与硬件相关的并发症。

结论:这是对 MIS ALIF 后腰痛结果的系统评价。所有研究的腰痛 VAS 评分均在术后降低。总体并发症发生率较低。在合适的患者人群中,MIS ALIF 安全有效,可降低腰痛。

相似文献

[1]
Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-9

[2]
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.

World Neurosurg. 2022-1

[3]
Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Neurosurg Focus. 2017-12

[4]
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021-9-18

[5]
Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.

Neurosurg Focus. 2018-1

[6]
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neurosurg Rev. 2018-7

[7]
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Neurosurg Focus. 2018-1

[8]
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?

World Neurosurg. 2015-5

[9]
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014-12

[10]
The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Experimental Analysis of Stress Shielding Effects in Screw Spacers Placed in Porcine Spinal Tissue.

J Funct Biomater. 2024-8-22

[2]
Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Asian Spine J. 2023-12

[3]
Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.

Eur Spine J. 2021-8

[4]
A Technical Nuance to Avoid Lumbar Five Radiculopathy with Anterior Lumbar Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation.

Case Rep Orthop. 2021-3-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索