1Division of Spinal Disorders, Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and.
2Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574.
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive anterior and lateral approaches to the lumbar spine are increasingly used to treat and reduce grade I spondylolisthesis, but concerns still exist for their usage in the management of higher-grade lesions. The authors report their experience with this strategy for grade II spondylolisthesis in a single-surgeon case series and provide early clinical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of a single surgeon's cases between 2012 and 2016 identified all patients with a Meyerding grade II lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) targeting the slipped level. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected and analyzed. Changes in radiographic measurements, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared using the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous and ordinal variables, respectively. RESULTS The average operative time was 199.1 minutes (with 60.6 ml of estimated blood loss) for LLIFs and 282.1 minutes (with 106.3 ml of estimated blood loss), for ALIFs. Three LLIF patients had transient unilateral anterior thigh numbness during the 1st week after surgery, and 1 ALIF patient had transient dorsiflexion weakness, which was resolved at postoperative week 1. The mean follow-up time was 17.6 months (SD 12.5 months) for LLIF patients and 10 months (SD 3.1 months) for ALIF patients. Complete reduction of the spondylolisthesis was achieved in 12 LLIF patients (75.0%) and 7 ALIF patients (87.5%). Across both procedures, there was an increase in both the segmental lordosis (LLIF 5.6°, p = 0.002; ALIF 15.0°, p = 0.002) and overall lumbar lordosis (LLIF 2.9°, p = 0.151; ALIF 5.1°, p = 0.006) after surgery. Statistically significant decreases in the mean VAS and the mean ODI measurements were seen in both treatment groups. The VAS and ODI scores fell by a mean value of 3.9 (p = 0.002) and 19.8 (p = 0.001), respectively, for LLIF patients and 3.8 (p = 0.02) and 21.0 (p = 0.03), respectively, for ALIF patients at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Early clinical and radiographic results from using minimally invasive LLIF and ALIF approaches to treat grade II spondylolisthesis appear to be good, with low operative blood loss and no neurological deficits. Complete reduction of the spondylolisthesis is frequently possible with a statistically significant reduction in pain scores.
微创前路和外侧入路腰椎间盘切除术越来越多地用于治疗和减少 I 度脊椎滑脱,但在处理更高程度的病变时仍存在担忧。作者报告了他们在单外科医生病例系列中使用这种策略治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱的经验,并提供了早期的临床和放射学结果。
回顾性分析 2012 年至 2016 年间一位外科医生的病例,确定所有接受微创侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)或前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)治疗滑脱水平的 II 度腰椎脊椎滑脱症患者。收集并分析人口统计学、临床和影像学数据。使用配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分别比较放射学测量、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)的变化,用于连续和有序变量。
LLIF 的平均手术时间为 199.1 分钟(估计失血量 60.6 毫升),ALIF 的平均手术时间为 282.1 分钟(估计失血量 106.3 毫升)。3 例 LLIF 患者术后第 1 周出现单侧大腿前暂时性麻木,1 例 ALIF 患者出现短暂性背屈无力,术后第 1 周缓解。LLIF 患者的平均随访时间为 17.6 个月(标准差 12.5 个月),ALIF 患者为 10 个月(标准差 3.1 个月)。12 例 LLIF 患者(75.0%)和 7 例 ALIF 患者(87.5%)完全复位。在两种手术中,节段性脊柱前凸(LLIF 5.6°,p = 0.002;ALIF 15.0°,p = 0.002)和整体腰椎前凸(LLIF 2.9°,p = 0.151;ALIF 5.1°,p = 0.006)均有增加。两组的平均 VAS 和平均 ODI 测量值均有显著下降。LLIF 患者的 VAS 和 ODI 评分分别平均下降 3.9(p = 0.002)和 19.8(p = 0.001),ALIF 患者分别下降 3.8(p = 0.02)和 21.0(p = 0.03)。
使用微创 LLIF 和 ALIF 方法治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱的早期临床和放射学结果似乎良好,手术失血量低,无神经功能缺损。脊椎滑脱症常可完全复位,疼痛评分有统计学意义的降低。