• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨深度的拥挤效应对于散焦侧翼刺激是以注视点为中心的,而对于散焦目标刺激是以观察者为中心的。

Crowding Effects Across Depth are Fixation-Centered for Defocused Flankers and Observer-Centered for Defocused Targets.

作者信息

Eberhardt Lisa V, Huckauf Anke

机构信息

General Psychology, Institute for Psychology and Pedagogics, Faculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 28;10(9):596. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090596.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci10090596
PMID:32872282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7564039/
Abstract

Depth needs to be considered to understand visual information processing in cluttered environments in the wild. Since differences in depth depend on current gaze position, eye movements were avoided by short presentations in a real depth setup. Thus, allowing only peripheral vision, crowding was tested. That is, the impairment of peripheral target recognition by the presence of nearby flankers was measured. Real depth was presented by a half-transparent mirror that aligned the displays of two orthogonally arranged, distance-adjustable screens. Fixation depth was at a distance of 190 cm, defocused depth planes were presented either near or far, in front of or behind the fixation depth, all within the depth of field. In Experiments 1 and 2, flankers were presented defocused, while the to-be-identified targets were on the fixation depth plane. In Experiments 3-5, targets were presented defocused, while the flankers were kept on the fixation depth plane. Results for defocused flankers indicate increased crowding effects with increased flanker distance from the target at focus (near to far). However, for defocused targets, crowding for targets in front of the focus as compared to behind was increased. Thus, defocused targets produce decreased crowding with increased target distance from the observer. To conclude, the effects of flankers in depth seem to be centered around fixation, while effects of target depth seem to be observer-centered.

摘要

为了理解自然杂乱环境中的视觉信息处理,需要考虑深度因素。由于深度差异取决于当前注视位置,因此在真实深度设置中通过短时间呈现来避免眼动。这样,仅允许周边视觉,对拥挤现象进行了测试。也就是说,测量了附近侧翼刺激物的存在对周边目标识别的损害。真实深度由一块半透明镜子呈现,该镜子使两个正交排列、距离可调节的屏幕的显示对齐。注视深度为190厘米,散焦的深度平面呈现在注视深度的前方或后方,近或远,都在景深范围内。在实验1和2中,侧翼刺激物呈散焦状态,而待识别的目标位于注视深度平面上。在实验3 - 5中,目标呈散焦状态,而侧翼刺激物保持在注视深度平面上。散焦侧翼刺激物的结果表明,随着侧翼刺激物与聚焦处目标的距离增加(从近到远),拥挤效应增强。然而,对于散焦目标,与聚焦处后方的目标相比,聚焦处前方目标的拥挤现象增加。因此,散焦目标随着与观察者距离的增加,拥挤现象减少。总之,深度中侧翼刺激物的效应似乎以注视点为中心,而目标深度的效应似乎以观察者为中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/e860ce260060/brainsci-10-00596-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/54303bf890aa/brainsci-10-00596-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/8a1f5ab9dd3a/brainsci-10-00596-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/0c4bbcaa1d65/brainsci-10-00596-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/e860ce260060/brainsci-10-00596-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/54303bf890aa/brainsci-10-00596-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/8a1f5ab9dd3a/brainsci-10-00596-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/0c4bbcaa1d65/brainsci-10-00596-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f48/7564039/e860ce260060/brainsci-10-00596-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Crowding Effects Across Depth are Fixation-Centered for Defocused Flankers and Observer-Centered for Defocused Targets.跨深度的拥挤效应对于散焦侧翼刺激是以注视点为中心的,而对于散焦目标刺激是以观察者为中心的。
Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 28;10(9):596. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090596.
2
Crowding in depth for binocular and monocular observation.双眼和单眼观察时的深度拥挤现象。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1951-1961. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01700-z.
3
Large depth differences between target and flankers can increase crowding: Evidence from a multi-depth plane display.目标与旁侧刺激之间的深度差异较大可增加拥挤效应:来自多深度平面显示的证据。
Elife. 2023 Sep 4;12:e85143. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85143.
4
Close - but not distant - conditioned flanker emotion affects crowding.近而不远处的条件性侧翼情绪会影响拥挤感。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):22. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.22.
5
Characterizing the role of disparity information in alleviating visual crowding.表征视差信息在缓解视觉拥挤中的作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 25;14(6):8. doi: 10.1167/14.6.8.
6
Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding.超拥挤:对目标进行弱掩蔽会扩大拥挤范围。
J Vis. 2009 Feb 10;9(2):12.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.2.12.
7
Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification.侧翼刺激的数量、复杂性和熟悉度对拥挤字母识别的影响。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 10;14(6):7. doi: 10.1167/14.6.7.
8
Constraints on Letter-in-String Identification in Peripheral Vision: Effects of Number of Flankers and Deployment of Attention.字符串中字母识别的限制因素:侧翼数量和注意力部署的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 13;4:119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00119. eCollection 2013.
9
Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When  configural  cues  eliminate the polarity advantage.视觉拥挤中的多维特征交互:当形态线索消除极性优势时。
J Vis. 2022 May 3;22(6):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.6.2.
10
Crowding results from optimal integration of visual targets with contextual information.拥挤是由于视觉目标与上下文信息的最佳整合而产生的。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 30;13(1):5741. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33508-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Large depth differences between target and flankers can increase crowding: Evidence from a multi-depth plane display.目标与旁侧刺激之间的深度差异较大可增加拥挤效应:来自多深度平面显示的证据。
Elife. 2023 Sep 4;12:e85143. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85143.
2
Visual crowding: Double dissociation between orientation and brightness judgments.视觉拥挤:方位和亮度判断的双重分离。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.7.
3
Close - but not distant - conditioned flanker emotion affects crowding.近而不远处的条件性侧翼情绪会影响拥挤感。

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Visual Search: How Do We Find What We Are Looking For?视觉搜索:我们如何找到我们正在寻找的东西?
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 15;6:539-562. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-015048. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
3
Allocation of attention in 3D space is adaptively modulated by relative position of target and distractor stimuli.3D空间中的注意力分配会根据目标刺激和干扰刺激的相对位置进行自适应调节。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):22. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.22.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1063-1073. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01878-2.
4
Challenges to pooling models of crowding: Implications for visual mechanisms.拥挤集合模型面临的挑战:对视觉机制的启示。
J Vis. 2019 Jul 1;19(7):15. doi: 10.1167/19.7.15.
5
Crowding in depth for binocular and monocular observation.双眼和单眼观察时的深度拥挤现象。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1951-1961. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01700-z.
6
The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.相关和不相关立体深度线索的影响:深度信息并不总是能吸引注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):1996-2007. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1571-2.
7
Multi-level Crowding and the Paradox of Object Recognition in Clutter.多层次拥挤与杂乱中目标识别的悖论。
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):R127-R133. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.051.
8
Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.出人意料的深度线索在视觉搜索中吸引注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1358-1364. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1382-9.
9
Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.拥挤效应、扫视精度和空间定位的变化揭示了空间视觉的共享拓扑结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 25;114(17):E3573-E3582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615504114. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Fast and Forceful: Modulation of Response Activation Induced by Shifts of Perceived Depth in Virtual 3D Space.快速且有力:虚拟3D空间中感知深度变化所引发的反应激活调制
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 15;7:1939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01939. eCollection 2016.