Eberhardt Lisa V, Huckauf Anke
General Psychology, Institute for Psychology and Pedagogics, Faculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 28;10(9):596. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090596.
Depth needs to be considered to understand visual information processing in cluttered environments in the wild. Since differences in depth depend on current gaze position, eye movements were avoided by short presentations in a real depth setup. Thus, allowing only peripheral vision, crowding was tested. That is, the impairment of peripheral target recognition by the presence of nearby flankers was measured. Real depth was presented by a half-transparent mirror that aligned the displays of two orthogonally arranged, distance-adjustable screens. Fixation depth was at a distance of 190 cm, defocused depth planes were presented either near or far, in front of or behind the fixation depth, all within the depth of field. In Experiments 1 and 2, flankers were presented defocused, while the to-be-identified targets were on the fixation depth plane. In Experiments 3-5, targets were presented defocused, while the flankers were kept on the fixation depth plane. Results for defocused flankers indicate increased crowding effects with increased flanker distance from the target at focus (near to far). However, for defocused targets, crowding for targets in front of the focus as compared to behind was increased. Thus, defocused targets produce decreased crowding with increased target distance from the observer. To conclude, the effects of flankers in depth seem to be centered around fixation, while effects of target depth seem to be observer-centered.
为了理解自然杂乱环境中的视觉信息处理,需要考虑深度因素。由于深度差异取决于当前注视位置,因此在真实深度设置中通过短时间呈现来避免眼动。这样,仅允许周边视觉,对拥挤现象进行了测试。也就是说,测量了附近侧翼刺激物的存在对周边目标识别的损害。真实深度由一块半透明镜子呈现,该镜子使两个正交排列、距离可调节的屏幕的显示对齐。注视深度为190厘米,散焦的深度平面呈现在注视深度的前方或后方,近或远,都在景深范围内。在实验1和2中,侧翼刺激物呈散焦状态,而待识别的目标位于注视深度平面上。在实验3 - 5中,目标呈散焦状态,而侧翼刺激物保持在注视深度平面上。散焦侧翼刺激物的结果表明,随着侧翼刺激物与聚焦处目标的距离增加(从近到远),拥挤效应增强。然而,对于散焦目标,与聚焦处后方的目标相比,聚焦处前方目标的拥挤现象增加。因此,散焦目标随着与观察者距离的增加,拥挤现象减少。总之,深度中侧翼刺激物的效应似乎以注视点为中心,而目标深度的效应似乎以观察者为中心。