• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。

Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M, Horowitz Todd S

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital / Harvard Med.

NIH, National Cancer Inst.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-017-0058
PMID:36711068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879335/
Abstract

How do we find what we are looking for? Fundamental limits on visual processing mean that even when the desired target is in our field of view, we often need to search, because it is impossible to recognize everything at once. Searching involves directing attention to objects that might be the target. This deployment of attention is not random. It is guided to the most promising items and locations by five factors discussed here: Bottom-up salience, top-down feature guidance, scene structure and meaning, the previous history of search over time scales from msec to years, and the relative value of the targets and distractors. Modern theories of search need to specify how all five factors combine to shape search behavior. An understanding of the rules of guidance can be used to improve the accuracy and efficiency of socially-important search tasks, from security screening to medical image perception.

摘要

我们如何找到我们正在寻找的东西?视觉处理的基本限制意味着,即使所需目标在我们的视野范围内,我们通常也需要进行搜索,因为不可能一次性识别所有事物。搜索涉及将注意力导向可能是目标的物体。这种注意力的部署并非随机。它由这里讨论的五个因素引导至最有希望的项目和位置:自下而上的显著性、自上而下的特征引导、场景结构和意义、从毫秒到数年时间尺度上搜索的先前历史,以及目标和干扰项的相对价值。现代搜索理论需要明确这五个因素如何结合以塑造搜索行为。对引导规则的理解可用于提高从安全检查到医学图像感知等社会重要搜索任务的准确性和效率。

相似文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Impaired top-down control of visual search in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者视觉搜索自上而下控制受损。
Schizophr Res. 2007 Aug;94(1-3):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.04.023. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
4
How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception?检查目的如何影响场景感知中视觉显著性的效力?
Perception. 2007;36(8):1123-38. doi: 10.1068/p5659.
5
Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.自下而上的知觉突显和自上而下的回溯提示共同决定视觉工作记忆中的状态。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Mar;74(3):459-470. doi: 10.1177/1747021820966264. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks.基于奖励的从自下而上搜索任务到自上而下搜索任务的转移。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):466-75. doi: 10.1177/0956797613509284. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
7
Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance.无需自上而下或自下而上引导的高效视觉搜索。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Feb;67(2):239-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03206488.
8
Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.在遗传性单纯小脑共济失调中,自上而下而非自下而上的视觉扫描受到影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e116181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116181. eCollection 2014.
9
Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.视觉搜索任务中上下文依赖特征联结学习的神经关联
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Jun;37(6):2319-30. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23176. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.什么时候该切换到下一张地图?引导式视觉搜索中的最优觅食。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2135-51. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1128-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Position-invariant icon remapping facilities search performance in foldable smartphones through the contribution of contextual cueing.位置不变图标重映射功能通过上下文线索的作用提升了可折叠智能手机中的搜索性能。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Sep 1;10(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00668-9.
2
How do different cognitive styles Learners deal with the bullet screen interruption in instructional videos? An eye-tracking study.不同认知风格的学习者如何应对教学视频中的弹幕干扰?一项眼动追踪研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 26;13(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03182-1.
3
Surface neatness as an index of aesthetic value of everyday objects.

本文引用的文献

1
Binocularity and visual search-Revisited.双眼视觉与视觉搜索——再探讨
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Feb;79(2):473-483. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1247-8.
2
Reconsidering Visual Search.重新审视视觉搜索
Iperception. 2015 Nov 8;6(6):2041669515614670. doi: 10.1177/2041669515614670. eCollection 2015 Dec.
3
Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015).视觉搜索复兴:斜率并非那么难以捉摸:对克里斯蒂扬松(2015年)的回应
作为日常用品美学价值指标的表面整洁度。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1578785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578785. eCollection 2025.
4
GMM-HMM-Based Eye Movement Classification for Efficient and Intuitive Dynamic Human-Computer Interaction Systems.基于高斯混合模型-隐马尔可夫模型的眼动分类用于高效直观的动态人机交互系统
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Jul 9;18(4):28. doi: 10.3390/jemr18040028. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Influence of Time Pressure on Successive Visual Searches.时间压力对连续视觉搜索的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Jul 17;18(4):31. doi: 10.3390/jemr18040031. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Understanding human visual foraging: a review.理解人类视觉觅食:综述
Biol Cybern. 2025 Jul 23;119(4-6):20. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01020-6.
7
Rethinking Distraction.重新思考注意力分散
Vis cogn. 2024;32(9-10):959-978. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2335118. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
8
Withstand Context: Standing Posture Improves Contextual Cueing in Challenging Visual Search.承受情境:站立姿势可改善具有挑战性的视觉搜索中的情境线索提示。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jul;62(7):e70108. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70108.
9
Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.挑选合适的目标:行动意图塑造人类多目标觅食中的视觉搜索和行动规划。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112656. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112656. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
10
Location- and feature-based selection histories make independent, qualitatively distinct contributions to urgent visuomotor performance.基于位置和特征的选择历史对紧急视觉运动表现做出独立的、性质上不同的贡献。
Elife. 2025 Jun 5;13:RP100280. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100280.
Iperception. 2016 May 5;7(3):2041669516643244. doi: 10.1177/2041669516643244. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Towards a better understanding of parallel visual processing in human vision: Evidence for exhaustive analysis of visual information.迈向对人类视觉中并行视觉处理的更好理解:视觉信息详尽分析的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):672-707. doi: 10.1037/xge0000163. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
Pooling of continuous features provides a unifying account of crowding.连续特征的汇聚为拥挤现象提供了一个统一的解释。
J Vis. 2016;16(3):39. doi: 10.1167/16.3.39.
6
Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex.利用目标驱动的深度学习模型理解感觉皮层。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):356-65. doi: 10.1038/nn.4244.
7
Long-term priming of visual search prevails against the passage of time and counteracting instructions.视觉搜索的长期启动效应不受时间推移和相反指令的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1293-303. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000233. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.视觉搜索中注意力的串行与并行模型:解释基准反应时分布
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1300-1315. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0978-1.
9
Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory.视觉长期记忆对注意力的偶然偏向。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jun;42(6):970-7. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000209. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time.注意力在空间和时间上进行非均匀搜索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):15214-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511331112. Epub 2015 Nov 23.