BET 2：在院前环境中使用 FAST 还是 ROSIER 来识别疑似脑卒中？

BET 2: FAST or ROSIER to identify suspected stroke in the prehospital setting?

机构信息

University Hospital of North Tees, Cleveland, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2020 Sep;37(9):586-587. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210497.3.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210497.3

Abstract

A short cut review was carried out to whether the FAST screening tool is more accurate than the ROSIER tool at correctly identifying those with stroke in the prehospital setting. 9 papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. It is concluded that FAST and ROSIER have similar sensitivities in the recognition of stroke, with ROSIER demonstrating a higher specificity in the prehospital setting.

摘要

一项简短的综述评估了 FAST 筛查工具在院前环境中识别脑卒中患者的准确性是否优于 ROSIER 工具。9 篇论文提供了最佳证据来回答这个临床问题。这些论文的作者、日期和出版国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局、结果和研究局限性都列成了表格。研究结论表明，在识别脑卒中方面，FAST 和 ROSIER 的敏感性相似，而 ROSIER 在院前环境中具有更高的特异性。