• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Facilitators, barriers and lessons learnt from the first state-wide naloxone distribution conducted in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州首次全州范围纳洛酮分发的促进因素、障碍和经验教训。
Inj Prev. 2021 Aug;27(4):369-374. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043666. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Lessons learned from ramping up a Canadian Take Home Naloxone programme during a public health emergency: a mixed-methods study.在公共卫生紧急情况下,加强加拿大外出纳洛酮方案的经验教训:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e030046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030046.
3
Providers' perceptions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing naloxone for patients at risk for opioid overdose after implementation of a national academic detailing program: A qualitative assessment.提供者对在实施国家学术细化项目后为有阿片类药物过量风险的患者开纳洛酮处方的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Barriers and facilitators of naloxone and safe injection facility interventions to reduce opioid drug-related deaths: A qualitative analysis.阿片类药物相关死亡的纳洛酮和安全注射设施干预措施的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104049. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104049. Epub 2023 May 27.
5
Overdose Education and Naloxone for Patients Prescribed Opioids in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Staff.基层医疗中为开具阿片类药物的患者提供过量用药教育和纳洛酮:一项关于基层医疗工作人员的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1837-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3394-3.
6
Hostility, compassion and role reversal in West Virginia's long opioid overdose emergency.西弗吉尼亚州漫长的阿片类药物过量紧急事件中的敌意、同情和角色转变。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Oct 12;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00416-w.
7
Barriers to implementation of opioid overdose prevention programs in Ohio.俄亥俄州阿片类药物过量预防项目实施的障碍。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):42-6. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1132294.
8
Training law enforcement to respond to opioid overdose with naloxone: Impact on knowledge, attitudes, and interactions with community members.培训执法人员使用纳洛酮应对阿片类药物过量:对知识、态度以及与社区成员互动的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Aug 1;165:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Opioid education and nasal naloxone rescue kits in the emergency department.急诊科的阿片类药物教育及鼻腔纳洛酮急救包
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):381-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.2.24909. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
10
Local health departments and the implementation of evidence-based policies to address opioid overdose mortality.地方卫生部门与实施基于证据的政策以应对阿片类药物过量死亡率
Subst Abus. 2020;41(4):468-474. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1709250. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand college health administrator perceptions on adopting and implementing opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs among universities nationally.应用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来了解全国各大学的健康管理人员对采用和实施阿片类药物过量教育及纳洛酮分发(OEND)项目的看法。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 21:rs.3.rs-7313339. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7313339/v1.
2
Transforming Opioid Overdose Prevention in the United States: Leveraging FDA's Narcan Approval to Foster a Culture of Health.转变美国阿片类药物过量预防:利用美国食品药品监督管理局对纳洛酮的批准来培育健康文化。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jun 14;18:1935-1946. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S521720. eCollection 2025.
3
Fentanyl and xylazine crisis: Crafting coherent strategies for opioid overdose prevention.芬太尼和赛拉嗪危机:制定连贯的阿片类药物过量预防策略。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 19;14(6):760-766. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.760.
4
Scaling up overdose education and naloxone distribution in Kentucky: adoption and reach achieved through a "hub with many spokes" model.在肯塔基州扩大过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发规模:通过“多中心辐射”模式实现的采用和覆盖范围。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00426-6.
5
Harm reduction implementation among HIV service organizations (HSOs) in the U.S. south: a policy context analysis and results from a survey of HSOs.美国南部艾滋病毒服务组织(HSO)中的减少伤害措施实施情况:政策背景分析及对 HSO 的调查结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08277-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for state, community and systems-level prevention strategies to address the opioid crisis.针对阿片类药物危机的州、社区和系统层面预防策略的证据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107563. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107563. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Implementation evaluation of academic detailing on naloxone prescribing trends at the United States Veterans Health Administration.学术细化对美国退伍军人健康管理局纳洛酮处方趋势的实施评估。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1055-1064. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13194. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
An evaluation of Take Home Naloxone program implementation in British Columbian correctional facilities.不列颠哥伦比亚省惩教设施中纳洛酮带回家计划实施情况的评估。
Int J Prison Health. 2019 Mar 11;15(1):46-57. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-12-2017-0058. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
The Emergency Department as an Opportunity for Naloxone Distribution.急诊科作为纳洛酮分发的机会。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):1036-1042. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38829. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
At-a-glance - Lessons learned from launching the Manitoba Take-Home Naloxone Program.一目了然——曼尼托巴省推出纳洛酮带回家计划的经验教训。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Jun;38(6):252-255. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.6.06.
6
From Peers to Lay Bystanders: Findings from a Decade of Naloxone Distribution in Pittsburgh, PA.从同行到普通旁观者:宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡十年来纳洛酮分发的研究结果。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(3):240-246. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2018.1430409. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
Identifying gaps in the implementation of naloxone programs for laypersons in the United States.找出美国针对非专业人员的纳洛酮项目实施过程中的差距。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Feb;52:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
8
Alberta's provincial take-home naloxone program: A multi-sectoral and multi-jurisdictional response to overdose.艾伯塔省的省带回家纳洛酮计划:对药物过量的多部门和多辖区应对措施。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;108(4):e398-e402. doi: 10.17269/cjph.108.5989.
9
Barriers and facilitators to dispensing of intranasal naloxone by pharmacists.药师配发鼻内纳洛酮的障碍和促进因素。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):331-341. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1391924. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
10
Twenty years of take-home naloxone for the prevention of overdose deaths from heroin and other opioids-Conception and maturation.用于预防海洛因及其他阿片类药物过量致死的带回家式纳洛酮二十年——构想与成熟历程
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 25.

西弗吉尼亚州首次全州范围纳洛酮分发的促进因素、障碍和经验教训。

Facilitators, barriers and lessons learnt from the first state-wide naloxone distribution conducted in West Virginia.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

School of Public Health, Health Research Center, Robert C Byrd Health Science Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2021 Aug;27(4):369-374. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043666. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043666
PMID:32873604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overdose education and naloxone distribution programmes are known to reduce opioid-related deaths. A state-wide naloxone distribution effort of 8250 rescue kits was undertaken by government, community and university partners in West Virginia in 2016-2017. The purpose of this study was to discern the barriers, facilitators and lesson learnt from implementing this endeavour in a rural state with the highest opioid overdose fatality rate in the US.

METHODS

Structured interviews (n=26) were conducted among both internal and external stakeholders. Those who participated were >18 years of age and were the lead representative from agencies that either received naloxone (ie, external stakeholders) or helped implement the distribution (ie, internal stakeholders). The interviews followed standardised scripts and lasted approximately 40 min. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Qualitative content analysis was performed by two researchers to determine themes surrounding facilitators or barriers to programme implementation.

RESULTS

The primary facilitators reported by stakeholders included collaborative partnerships, ease of participating in the programme, being established in prevention efforts, demand for naloxone and the need for personal protection from overdose. The primary barriers identified by stakeholders included bureaucracy/policy/procedures of their organisation or agency, stigma, logistical or planning issues, problems with reporting, lack of communication post distribution and sustainability. Numerous lessons were learnt.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the implementation of the programme in 87 organisations, including law enforcement and fire departments, the impact of facilitators outweighed that of barriers. These findings may inform others planning to conduct a similar, large-scale project.

摘要

背景

众所周知,过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发计划可降低阿片类药物相关死亡人数。2016-2017 年,西弗吉尼亚州的政府、社区和大学合作伙伴开展了一项全州范围内的纳洛酮分发工作,分发了 8250 个救援包。本研究旨在了解在全美阿片类药物过量死亡率最高的农村州实施这一计划的障碍、促进因素和经验教训。

方法

对 26 名内部和外部利益相关者进行了结构化访谈。参与者年龄均>18 岁,且是接受纳洛酮的机构(即外部利益相关者)或帮助实施该分发计划的机构(即内部利益相关者)的主要代表。访谈遵循标准脚本,持续约 40 分钟。会议进行了录音,并进行了转录。两位研究人员对定性内容进行了分析,以确定围绕计划实施的促进因素或障碍的主题。

结果

利益相关者报告的主要促进因素包括合作伙伴关系、参与计划的便利性、在预防工作中的地位、对纳洛酮的需求以及对避免过量用药的个人保护需求。利益相关者确定的主要障碍包括其组织或机构的官僚主义/政策/程序、耻辱感、后勤或规划问题、报告问题、分发后沟通不畅以及可持续性问题。从中吸取了许多教训。

结论

根据在包括执法和消防部门在内的 87 个组织中实施该计划的情况,促进因素的影响超过了障碍的影响。这些发现可能为其他计划开展类似的大规模项目提供参考。