Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Dusemund Birgit, Kouba Maryline, Kos Durjava Mojca, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Sanz Yolanda, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Glandorf Boet, Herman Lieve, Prieto Maradona Miguel, Saarela Maria, Anguita Montserrat, Galobart Jaume, Holczknecht Orsolya, Manini Paola, Pizzo Fabiola, Tarrés-Call Jordi, Pettenati Elisa
EFSA J. 2020 Jun 15;18(6):e06166. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6166. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of DSM 16244 as a technological additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There was no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumer and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The additive was not irritant to skin and eyes but considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The present application for renewal of the authorisation did not include a proposal for amending or supplementing the conditions of the original authorisation that would have an impact on the efficacy of the additive. Therefore, there was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
应欧盟委员会要求，动物饲料添加剂及产品或物质专家小组（FEEDAP）被要求就DSM 16244作为所有动物物种的技术添加剂续期授权申请的评估发表科学意见。申请人已提供证据表明，目前市场上的添加剂符合现有授权条件。没有新的证据会使FEEDAP专家小组重新考虑其先前的结论。因此，专家小组得出结论，在授权使用条件下，该添加剂对所有动物物种、消费者和环境仍然是安全的。该添加剂对皮肤和眼睛无刺激性，但被认为是皮肤和呼吸道致敏剂。本次续期授权申请未包括对原授权条件进行修改或补充的提议，而这些修改或补充会对添加剂的功效产生影响。因此，在续期授权时无需评估该添加剂的功效。
