Greenaway Matthew, Walton Edward, Gibson Daren, Le Roux Anton, Yates Piers, Ebert Jay, D'Alessandro Peter
Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Australia.
Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Australia.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun 13;2(4):e309-e314. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.03.003. eCollection 2020 Aug.
To establish the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and operative incidence of ramp lesions in a consecutive group of patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to propose a graded radiologic classification that seeks to define key preoperative features that most strongly correlate with arthroscopically confirmed ramp lesions.
After retrospective review, all consecutive patients who underwent ACLR with preoperative MRI over a 16-month period were included in the study. Diagnostic arthroscopy with direct visualization of the posteromedial compartment was used to establish the true incidence of ramp lesions. Three radiologists, blinded to the surgical findings, independently analyzed the MRI scans of all patients and classified the signal intensity at the posterior meniscocapsular junction using 4 criteria (type 1, diffuse increased signal equal to adjacent femoral cartilage; type 2, diffuse increased signal greater than cartilage; type 3, diffuse increased signal plus full-height linear fluid-signal cleft; and type 4, full-height fluid-signal meniscocapsular separation). Interobserver reliability, in addition to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, was calculated.
Of the 93 patients included (mean age, 26.7 years), 11 (11.8%) were confirmed to have ramp lesions on arthroscopy. Inter-rater reliability for the MRI diagnosis of the positive ramp lesions was good, at 0.75. Type 3 criteria were the most accurate, producing average sensitivity and specificity values of 85% and 82%, respectively.
Ramp lesions are not infrequently encountered in ACLR and, if not recognized at the time of surgery, may contribute to inferior outcomes. MRI is an effective method of preoperative assessment, and the presence of type 3 changes should be used as criteria for radiologically definitive ramp lesion diagnosis.
This study highlights the incidence of meniscal ramp lesions encountered in ACLR surgery and the effectiveness of MRI as a preoperative imaging modality.
在一组连续接受前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的患者中,确定半月板后角损伤的磁共振成像(MRI)表现及手术发生率,并提出一种分级放射学分类方法,以明确与关节镜证实的半月板后角损伤最密切相关的关键术前特征。
经过回顾性研究,纳入在16个月期间接受ACLR且术前行MRI检查的所有连续患者。采用诊断性关节镜直接观察后内侧间室,以确定半月板后角损伤的实际发生率。三位对手术结果不知情的放射科医生独立分析所有患者的MRI扫描图像,并使用4项标准对半月板后关节囊交界处的信号强度进行分类(1型,信号弥漫性增加,与相邻股骨软骨相等;2型,信号弥漫性增加,大于软骨;3型,信号弥漫性增加加上全层线性液性信号裂隙;4型,全层液性信号半月板关节囊分离)。计算观察者间可靠性以及敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
纳入的93例患者(平均年龄26.7岁)中,11例(11.8%)在关节镜检查中被证实存在半月板后角损伤。MRI诊断阳性半月板后角损伤的观察者间可靠性良好,为0.75。3型标准最准确,平均敏感度和特异度值分别为85%和82%。
半月板后角损伤在ACLR中并不少见,如果在手术时未被识别,可能导致较差的手术结果。MRI是一种有效的术前评估方法,3型改变的存在应作为放射学确诊半月板后角损伤的标准。
本研究强调了ACLR手术中半月板后角损伤的发生率以及MRI作为术前成像方式的有效性。