• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估纽约州腹腔镜胆囊切除术的再入院情况。

Evaluating readmissions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the state of New York.

机构信息

Division of General and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.

Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4667-4672. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07906-9. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07906-9
PMID:32875412
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hospital readmissions constitute an important component of associated costs of a disease and can contribute a significant burden to healthcare. The majority of studies evaluating readmissions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) comprise of single center studies and thus can underestimate the actual incidence of readmission. We sought to examine the rate and causes of readmissions following LC using a large longitudinal database.

METHODS

The New York SPARCS database was used to identify all adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign biliary disease between 2000 and 2016. Due to the presence of a unique identifier, patients with readmission to any New York hospital were evaluated. Planned versus unplanned readmission rates were compared. Following univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for unplanned readmissions after accounting for baseline characteristics, comorbidities and complications.

RESULTS

There were 591,627 patients who underwent LC during the studied time period. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.94% (n = 29,245) and unplanned 30-days readmission rate was 4.58% (n = 27,084). Female patients were less likely to have 30-day unplanned readmissions. Patients with age older than 65 or younger than 29 were more likely to have 30-day unplanned readmissions compared to patients with age 30-44 or 45-64. Insurance status was also significant, as patients with Medicaid/Medicare were more likely to have unplanned readmissions compared to commercial insurance. In addition, variables such as Black race, presence of any comorbidity, postoperative complication, and prolonged initial hospital length of stay were associated with subsequent readmission.

CONCLUSION

This data show that readmissions rates following LC are relatively low; however, majority of readmissions are unplanned. Most common reason for unplanned readmissions was associated with complications of the procedure or medical care. By identifying certain risk groups, unplanned readmissions may be prevented.

摘要

介绍

医院再入院是疾病相关成本的一个重要组成部分,会给医疗保健带来巨大负担。大多数评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后再入院率的研究都是单中心研究,因此可能低估了实际再入院率。我们试图使用大型纵向数据库来检查 LC 后的再入院率和原因。

方法

使用纽约 SPARCS 数据库确定 2000 年至 2016 年间因良性胆道疾病接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的所有成年患者。由于存在唯一标识符,评估了有再入院至纽约任何医院的患者。比较计划性和非计划性再入院率。在单因素分析后,使用多变量逻辑回归模型,在考虑基线特征、合并症和并发症的情况下,确定非计划性再入院的危险因素。

结果

在研究期间,有 591627 例患者接受了 LC。总体 30 天再入院率为 4.94%(n=29245),非计划性 30 天再入院率为 4.58%(n=27084)。女性患者 30 天非计划性再入院的可能性较小。年龄大于 65 岁或小于 29 岁的患者与 30-44 岁或 45-64 岁的患者相比,30 天非计划性再入院的可能性更高。保险状况也很重要,因为与商业保险相比,有医疗补助/医疗保险的患者更有可能出现非计划性再入院。此外,黑种人、存在任何合并症、术后并发症和初始住院时间延长等变量与随后的再入院有关。

结论

这些数据表明,LC 后再入院率相对较低;然而,大多数再入院是计划外的。非计划性再入院的最常见原因与手术或医疗护理的并发症有关。通过确定某些风险群体,可以预防非计划性再入院。

相似文献

1
Evaluating readmissions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the state of New York.评估纽约州腹腔镜胆囊切除术的再入院情况。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4667-4672. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07906-9. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Six-month readmissions after bariatric surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis.减重手术后 6 个月的再入院率:一项全国性分析的结果。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):926-933. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Hospital readmission after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictors.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的医院再入院:发生率及预测因素
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Independent Associations With 30- and 90-Day Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A National Trend Analysis of 144 123 Patients.择期腰椎手术后 30 天和 90 天非计划性再入院的独立相关性:144123 例患者的全国趋势分析。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Mar 1;84(3):758-767. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy215.
5
Coronary artery bypass graft readmission rates and risk factors - A retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉旁路移植术再入院率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
All-Cause Versus Complication-Specific Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后全因再入院与特定并发症再入院的对比
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 5;99(13):1093-1103. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00874.
7
Early unplanned readmissions following same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis.急性胆源性胰腺炎同一入院期间胆囊切除术后早期非计划再入院情况。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3001-3010. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08595-8. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Burden of Readmissions Among Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia.严重肢体缺血患者的再入院负担。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 18;69(15):1897-1908. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.040. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Thirty days are inadequate for assessing readmission following complex hepatopancreatobiliary procedures.30 天不足以评估复杂肝胆胰手术后的再入院情况。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2508-2516. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6539-8. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
National Landscape of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Rates for Acute Non-hemorrhagic Diverticulitis: Insight from National Readmission Database.急性非出血性憩室炎 30 天再入院率的国家景观:来自国家再入院数据库的见解。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06284-5. Epub 2020 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of interval cholecystectomy timing after percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy on post-operative adverse outcomes.经皮经肝胆道穿刺置管引流术后择期胆囊切除术时机对术后不良结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9132-9138. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10451-w. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
Development of a prospective biliary dashboard to compare performance and surgical cost.前瞻性胆道仪表盘的开发,用于比较性能和手术成本。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8829-8840. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10376-4. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Magnetic anchor technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost Analysis and Supply Utilization of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本分析与耗材使用情况
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Dec 10;2018:7838103. doi: 10.1155/2018/7838103. eCollection 2018.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的磁性锚定技术:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1005-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09562-7. Epub 2022 Sep 9.