Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Clements Imaging Bldg (NE2.210), 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390.
Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
On the basis of expert consensus, PI-RADS version 2.1 (v2.1) introduced the transition zone (TZ) atypical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodule, defined as a TZ lesion with an incomplete or absent capsule (T2 score, 2). PI-RADS v2.1 also included a revised scoring pathway whereby such nodules, if exhibiting marked restricted diffusion (DWI score, 4-5), are upgraded from overall PI-RADS category 2 to category 3 (2 + 1 TZ lesions). The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in prospectively reported 2 + 1 TZ lesions, as defined by PI-RADS v2.1, and conventional 3 + 0 TZ lesions with targeted biopsy as the reference standard. This retrospective study included men with no known PCa or with treatment-naïve grade group (GG) 1 PCa who underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI of the prostate with prospective reporting by means of PI-RADS v2.1. Patients with at least one PI-RADS category 3 TZ lesion who underwent targeted biopsy formed the final sample. Biopsy results were summarized descriptively for 2 + 1 and 3 + 0 lesions. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare csPCa detection rates between groups. Associations between csPCa in 2 + 1 lesions and patient age, PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, biopsy history, lesion size, and lesion ADC were tested with Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Among 1238 eligible patients who underwent MRI reported with PI-RADS v2.1, 2 + 1 lesions were reported in 6% ( = 69) and 3 + 0 TZ lesions in 7% ( = 87) of patients. No PCa, GG1 PCa, or csPCa was found in 84% ( = 41), 10% ( = 5), and 6% ( = 3) of 49 patients with 2 + 1 lesions who underwent targeted biopsy. Nor were they found in 74% ( = 45), 15% ( = 9), and 11% ( = 7) of 61 patients with 3 + 0 lesions who underwent targeted biopsy. The csPCa detection rate was not significantly different between 2 + 1 and 3 + 0 lesions ( = .31). All cases of csPCa were GG2, except for one 3 + 0 lesion with a GG3 tumor. No clinical or imaging variable was associated with csPCa in 2 + 1 lesions. The rate of csPCa in atypical BPH nodules with marked restricted diffusion was low (6%) and not significantly different from that of conventional 3 + 0 TZ lesions (11%). The results provide prospective clinical data about the revised TZ scoring criterion and pathway in PI-RADS v2.1 for atypical BPH nodules with marked restricted diffusion.
基于专家共识,PI-RADS 版本 2.1(v2.1)引入了过渡区(TZ)非典型前列腺增生(BPH)结节,定义为具有不完整或不存在包膜的 TZ 病变(T2 评分,2 分)。PI-RADS v2.1 还包括修订后的评分途径,如果这些结节表现出明显的受限扩散(DWI 评分,4-5 分),则从整体 PI-RADS 类别 2 升级为类别 3(2+1TZ 病变)。本研究旨在比较前瞻性报告的 2+1TZ 病变(根据 PI-RADS v2.1 定义)和传统的 3+0TZ 病变中临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的检出率,以靶向活检为参考标准。这项回顾性研究包括没有已知前列腺癌或治疗初治 GG1 前列腺癌的男性,他们接受了 3-T 多参数前列腺 MRI 检查,并通过 PI-RADS v2.1 进行了前瞻性报告。至少有一个 PI-RADS 类别 3TZ 病变且接受靶向活检的患者构成了最终样本。对 2+1 和 3+0 病变的活检结果进行了描述性总结。使用广义估计方程比较两组之间的 csPCa 检出率。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Fisher 精确检验检验 csPCa 在 2+1 病变中与患者年龄、PSA 水平、前列腺体积、PSA 密度、活检史、病变大小和病变 ADC 的相关性。在 1238 名接受 MRI 检查并报告 PI-RADS v2.1 的合格患者中,6%(=69)的患者报告了 2+1 病变,7%(=87)的患者报告了 3+0TZ 病变。在接受靶向活检的 49 名 2+1 病变患者中,84%(=41)未发现无前列腺癌、GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa,10%(=5)和 6%(=3)未发现 GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa。在接受靶向活检的 61 名 3+0 病变患者中,74%(=45)、15%(=9)和 11%(=7)未发现无前列腺癌、GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa。csPCa 的检出率在 2+1 和 3+0 病变之间无显著差异(=0.31)。所有 csPCa 病例均为 GG2,除了一个 GG3 肿瘤的 3+0 病变。在 2+1 病变中,没有临床或影像学变量与 csPCa 相关。具有明显受限扩散的非典型 BPH 结节中 csPCa 的发生率较低(6%),与传统的 3+0TZ 病变(11%)无显著差异。研究结果为 PI-RADS v2.1 中具有明显受限扩散的非典型 BPH 结节的修订 TZ 评分标准和途径提供了前瞻性临床数据。