• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性 PI-RADS v2.1 伴显著弥散受限的不典型前列腺增生结节:多参数 MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌。

Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Clements Imaging Bldg (NE2.210), 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390.

Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.20.24370
PMID:32876473
Abstract

On the basis of expert consensus, PI-RADS version 2.1 (v2.1) introduced the transition zone (TZ) atypical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodule, defined as a TZ lesion with an incomplete or absent capsule (T2 score, 2). PI-RADS v2.1 also included a revised scoring pathway whereby such nodules, if exhibiting marked restricted diffusion (DWI score, 4-5), are upgraded from overall PI-RADS category 2 to category 3 (2 + 1 TZ lesions). The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in prospectively reported 2 + 1 TZ lesions, as defined by PI-RADS v2.1, and conventional 3 + 0 TZ lesions with targeted biopsy as the reference standard. This retrospective study included men with no known PCa or with treatment-naïve grade group (GG) 1 PCa who underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI of the prostate with prospective reporting by means of PI-RADS v2.1. Patients with at least one PI-RADS category 3 TZ lesion who underwent targeted biopsy formed the final sample. Biopsy results were summarized descriptively for 2 + 1 and 3 + 0 lesions. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare csPCa detection rates between groups. Associations between csPCa in 2 + 1 lesions and patient age, PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, biopsy history, lesion size, and lesion ADC were tested with Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Among 1238 eligible patients who underwent MRI reported with PI-RADS v2.1, 2 + 1 lesions were reported in 6% ( = 69) and 3 + 0 TZ lesions in 7% ( = 87) of patients. No PCa, GG1 PCa, or csPCa was found in 84% ( = 41), 10% ( = 5), and 6% ( = 3) of 49 patients with 2 + 1 lesions who underwent targeted biopsy. Nor were they found in 74% ( = 45), 15% ( = 9), and 11% ( = 7) of 61 patients with 3 + 0 lesions who underwent targeted biopsy. The csPCa detection rate was not significantly different between 2 + 1 and 3 + 0 lesions ( = .31). All cases of csPCa were GG2, except for one 3 + 0 lesion with a GG3 tumor. No clinical or imaging variable was associated with csPCa in 2 + 1 lesions. The rate of csPCa in atypical BPH nodules with marked restricted diffusion was low (6%) and not significantly different from that of conventional 3 + 0 TZ lesions (11%). The results provide prospective clinical data about the revised TZ scoring criterion and pathway in PI-RADS v2.1 for atypical BPH nodules with marked restricted diffusion.

摘要

基于专家共识,PI-RADS 版本 2.1(v2.1)引入了过渡区(TZ)非典型前列腺增生(BPH)结节,定义为具有不完整或不存在包膜的 TZ 病变(T2 评分,2 分)。PI-RADS v2.1 还包括修订后的评分途径,如果这些结节表现出明显的受限扩散(DWI 评分,4-5 分),则从整体 PI-RADS 类别 2 升级为类别 3(2+1TZ 病变)。本研究旨在比较前瞻性报告的 2+1TZ 病变(根据 PI-RADS v2.1 定义)和传统的 3+0TZ 病变中临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的检出率,以靶向活检为参考标准。这项回顾性研究包括没有已知前列腺癌或治疗初治 GG1 前列腺癌的男性,他们接受了 3-T 多参数前列腺 MRI 检查,并通过 PI-RADS v2.1 进行了前瞻性报告。至少有一个 PI-RADS 类别 3TZ 病变且接受靶向活检的患者构成了最终样本。对 2+1 和 3+0 病变的活检结果进行了描述性总结。使用广义估计方程比较两组之间的 csPCa 检出率。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Fisher 精确检验检验 csPCa 在 2+1 病变中与患者年龄、PSA 水平、前列腺体积、PSA 密度、活检史、病变大小和病变 ADC 的相关性。在 1238 名接受 MRI 检查并报告 PI-RADS v2.1 的合格患者中,6%(=69)的患者报告了 2+1 病变,7%(=87)的患者报告了 3+0TZ 病变。在接受靶向活检的 49 名 2+1 病变患者中,84%(=41)未发现无前列腺癌、GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa,10%(=5)和 6%(=3)未发现 GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa。在接受靶向活检的 61 名 3+0 病变患者中,74%(=45)、15%(=9)和 11%(=7)未发现无前列腺癌、GG1 前列腺癌或 csPCa。csPCa 的检出率在 2+1 和 3+0 病变之间无显著差异(=0.31)。所有 csPCa 病例均为 GG2,除了一个 GG3 肿瘤的 3+0 病变。在 2+1 病变中,没有临床或影像学变量与 csPCa 相关。具有明显受限扩散的非典型 BPH 结节中 csPCa 的发生率较低(6%),与传统的 3+0TZ 病变(11%)无显著差异。研究结果为 PI-RADS v2.1 中具有明显受限扩散的非典型 BPH 结节的修订 TZ 评分标准和途径提供了前瞻性临床数据。

相似文献

1
Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.前瞻性 PI-RADS v2.1 伴显著弥散受限的不典型前列腺增生结节:多参数 MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.PI-RADS v2.1 版中通过异常扩散加权成像升级的前列腺移行区非典型结节的前列腺癌患病率:与MRI引导下TRUS引导的靶向活检的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):683-690. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23932. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.PI-RADS 版本 2 和版本 2.1 对检测移行区前列腺癌的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 May;216(5):1247-1256. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23883. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 用于前列腺癌检测的前瞻性评估及多参数 MRI 衍生标志物的研究
Radiology. 2023 May;307(4):e221309. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221309. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.基于 PI-RADS v2.1 分类的 MRI-超声融合靶向活检在前列腺移行/周围区的有效性和准确性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Sep;58(3):709-717. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28614. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.PI-RADS v2与v2.1在移行区病变中检测前列腺癌的直接比较:初步经验
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Aug;52(2):577-586. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27080. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
7
Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.PI-RADS 版本 2 决策规则的拟议调整:对前列腺癌检测的影响。
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):119-129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161124. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 与 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 对移行区前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Prevalence of prostate cancer in PI-RADS version 2.1 T2-weighted transition zone 'nodule in nodule' and 'homogeneous mildly hypointense area between nodules' criteria: MRI-radical prostatectomy histopathological evaluation.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 T2 加权移行带“结节内结节”和“结节间均匀轻度低信号区”标准中前列腺癌的患病率:MRI-根治性前列腺切除术的组织病理学评估。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7792-7801. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07855-4. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.采用结构化方法解决 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与靶向前列腺活检结果之间的差异:提高质量的机会。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2917-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03562-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating benign from malignant lesions in prostate PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule".表观扩散系数值在前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2.1第1类“结节内结节”中鉴别良性与恶性病变的诊断效能
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04930-y.
2
Detection rates for prostate cancer using PI-RADS 2.1 upgrading rules in transition zone lesions align with risk assessment categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用PI-RADS 2.1升级规则对移行区病变进行前列腺癌检测的比率与风险评估类别相符:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11618-w.
3
PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation of prostate "nodule in nodule" variants: clinical, imaging, and pathological features.
PI-RADS v2.1对前列腺“结节内结节”变体的评估:临床、影像和病理特征
Insights Imaging. 2024 Mar 18;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01651-6.
4
Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 用于前列腺癌检测的前瞻性评估及多参数 MRI 衍生标志物的研究
Radiology. 2023 May;307(4):e221309. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221309. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Characterization of high-grade prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI: assessment of PI-RADS version 2.1 and version 2 descriptors across 21 readers with varying experience (MULTI study).多参数磁共振成像对高级别前列腺癌的特征描述:针对21名经验各异的阅片者评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第2.1版及第2版描述符(多中心研究)
Insights Imaging. 2023 Mar 20;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01391-z.
6
Living systematic review and meta-analysis of the prostate MRI diagnostic test with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment for the detection of prostate cancer: study protocol.基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评估的前列腺 MRI 诊断检测用于前列腺癌检测的系统评价和荟萃分析:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e066327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066327.
7
Effect of Bicalutamide Combined with Docetaxel on Serum PSA and VEGF Levels in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.比卡鲁胺联合多西他赛对晚期前列腺癌患者血清前列腺特异抗原和血管内皮生长因子水平的影响
Dis Markers. 2022 Aug 17;2022:4506350. doi: 10.1155/2022/4506350. eCollection 2022.
8
Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Predicting P504s/P63 Immunohistochemical Expression: A Noninvasive Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer.基于影像组学的机器学习模型预测P504s/P63免疫组化表达:一种前列腺癌的非侵入性诊断工具
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;12:911426. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911426. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.PI-RADS v2.1 与 PI-RADS v2 诊断性能和读者间一致性的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210509. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210509. Epub 2021 Sep 14.