• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小耳畸形再造术后肋软骨框架延迟吸收的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Delayed Resorption of Costal Cartilage Framework Following Microtia Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Nov/Dec;22(6):456-463. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0144. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0144
PMID:32876485
Abstract

Resorption of the cartilage framework results from hematoma or infection, deteriorating outcomes in microtia reconstruction. Delayed resorption still occurs for unclear reasons in patients without adverse events. The risk factors for delayed framework resorption were explored in this 20-year microtia cohort. Patients who underwent auricular elevation >5 years ago were reviewed from January 2001 to March 2019. Bilateral microtia, infection, and hematoma cases were excluded. Framework resorption was graded on the last photographs as none to minimal (grade 1), blunted but all components present (grade 2), loss of either the helical or antihelical component (grade 3), and loss of all components (grade 4). Logistic regression was used to evaluate independent risk factors for grade 3 and 4 resorption. Of the 367 patients, 132 revisited our institution with a mean postoperative duration of 8.0 years. Grade 1 resorption was seen in 37.1%, 2 in 31.8%, 3 in 24.2%, and 4 in 6.8%. Canalplasty increased the risk of resorption regardless of timing (before auricular elevation,  = 0.017; after auricular elevation,  = 0.011). Body mass index at the time of cartilage harvest lowered the risk of resorption ( = 0.057) with clinical significance. Canalplasty may be avoided given the risk of framework resorption or may be performed with antiresorption strategies if the expected hearing outcome is superior. Our timing of harvest at the age of 10 years may have ensured cartilage maturation, both in terms of size and biomechanics, resulting in the resistance to resorption.

摘要

软骨框架的吸收是由血肿或感染引起的,这会恶化小耳畸形重建的结果。在没有不良事件的患者中,仍不明原因地发生延迟吸收。本研究旨在探讨这一长达 20 年的小耳畸形队列中延迟框架吸收的危险因素。从 2001 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月,回顾了过去 5 年以上行耳廓抬高术的患者。排除双侧小耳畸形、感染和血肿病例。根据最后一次照片将框架吸收分级为无至轻度(1 级)、钝但所有成分均存在(2 级)、螺旋或反螺旋结构之一缺失(3 级)和所有成分缺失(4 级)。使用逻辑回归评估 3 级和 4 级吸收的独立危险因素。在 367 例患者中,有 132 例患者在术后 8.0 年时复诊,1 级吸收占 37.1%,2 级占 31.8%,3 级占 24.2%,4 级占 6.8%。无论时机如何,耳甲腔成形术都会增加吸收的风险(耳廓抬高前,=0.017;耳廓抬高后,=0.011)。软骨采集时的体重指数降低了吸收的风险(=0.057),具有临床意义。考虑到框架吸收的风险,可能需要避免耳甲腔成形术,或者如果预期听力效果较好,可能需要使用抗吸收策略。我们在 10 岁时进行软骨采集的时机可能确保了软骨的成熟度,无论是在大小还是生物力学方面,这使得软骨不易吸收。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Delayed Resorption of Costal Cartilage Framework Following Microtia Reconstruction.小耳畸形再造术后肋软骨框架延迟吸收的危险因素。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Nov/Dec;22(6):456-463. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0144. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Costal Cartilage Assessment in Surgical Timing of Microtia Reconstruction.小耳畸形重建手术时机中的肋软骨评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1521-1525. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003751.
3
Comparison of microtia reconstruction outcomes using rib cartilage vs porous polyethylene implant.使用肋软骨与多孔聚乙烯植入物进行小耳畸形重建结果的比较。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):240-4. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.30.
4
Predictors for Unfavorable Projection of the Constructed Auricle following Ear Elevation Surgery in Microtia Reconstruction.耳后提升术在小耳畸形再造术中对构建的耳廓不良预测因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4):993-1001. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004234.
5
Management of chest deformity caused by microtia reconstruction: Comparison of autogenous diced cartilage versus cadaver cartilage graft partial filling techniques.先天性小耳畸形再造术后胸壁畸形的处理:自体碎软骨与同种异体软骨部分填充技术的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jan;70(1):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Long-term aesthetics, patient-reported outcomes, and auricular sensitivity after microtia reconstruction: A systematic review.小耳畸形重建术后的长期美学、患者报告结局和耳部敏感性:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Dec;74(12):3213-3234. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Differences between Bilateral Costal Cartilage in Patients with Microtia: A Retrospective Study Using Three-Dimensional Imaging.双侧肋软骨在小耳畸形患者中的差异:一项使用三维成像的回顾性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):939-942. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008962.
8
Aesthetic Auricular Reconstruction in Adult Patients with Rib Cartilage Calcification Using a Modified Two-Step Technique.采用改良两步法对肋软骨钙化的成年患者进行耳部美学重建。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1556-1564. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1206-y. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Long-term complications of microtia reconstruction: A systematic review.小耳畸形重建的长期并发症:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Dec;74(12):3235-3250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
10
Firm Elevation of Reconstructed Auricle Using Polydactyly Digit in Microtia.利用多指畸形手指进行小耳畸形再造耳廓的稳固抬高术
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Mar;29(2):409-410. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004106.

引用本文的文献

1
Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes.小耳畸形重建:我们改善治疗效果的策略。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Feb 28;56(2):130-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1762907. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Porous Polyethylene Versus Autologous Costochondral Reconstruction for Microtia: Incidence and Analysis of Secondary Procedures.多孔聚乙烯与自体肋软骨重建术治疗小耳畸形:二次手术的发生率及分析。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Mar;61(3):365-372. doi: 10.1177/10556656221132034. Epub 2022 Oct 11.