Department of Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, P&S Building, Suite 10-445, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Feb;41(2):381-390. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04667-5. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.
生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)单药治疗可能比联合使用传统合成 DMARDs(csDMARDs)治疗更能提高依从性并减少不良反应;然而,bDMARD 单药治疗的持久性尚未得到广泛研究。我们探讨了在联合使用 csDMARDs 和 TNF 抑制剂(TNFi)达到缓解/低疾病活动度(LDA)的患者中,依那西普单药治疗和其他 TNFi 单药治疗的持久性。利用 Corrona 登记数据,确定了在 6 个月和 12 个月时达到索引 TNFi(依那西普与其他 TNFi)持续治疗的患者百分比。检查了影响 6 个月和 12 个月时持续性和治疗模式的因素。在 617 名符合条件的患者中,182 名依那西普患者中有 56%和 435 名其他 TNFi 患者中有 45%在 6 个月时持续单药治疗,分别有 46%和 33%在 12 个月时持续单药治疗。在一线和后续生物 DMARDs 中,依那西普的持久性比其他 TNFi 高 10.8%(95%CI 2.1%,19.6%),在 6 个月时为 11.4%(95%CI 0.9%,21.9%)。在 6 个月后,其他 TNFi 患者更有可能需要重新引入 csDMARD(45%对比依那西普的 35%)。缓解是依那西普和其他 TNFi 单药治疗持久性的关键预测因素。这项回顾性队列研究利用反映真实世界实践的登记数据表明,在联合使用 csDMARD 和 TNFi 治疗达到缓解/LDA 的患者可能成功过渡到 TNFi 单药治疗。依那西普单药治疗的患者比接受其他 TNFi 单药治疗的患者持久性更高,重新引入 csDMARD 的频率更低。