Suppr超能文献

预防手术部位感染的证据与实践之间持续存在的差距。定性研究。

The persistent breach between evidence and practice in the prevention of surgical site infection. Qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc Ribas 1, 08402, Spain; Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana, 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.027. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the dissemination of guidelines for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention, a gap between the theoretical measures and their compliance persists. Accurate estimates of the implementation of preventative measures is crucial before planning dissemination strategies.

METHODS

A web-based survey was distributed to members of 11 Associations of operative nurses and surgeons. Questions aimed to determine their awareness of evidence, personal beliefs and actual use of the main preventative measures.

RESULTS

Of 1105 responders, 50.5% receive no feed-back of their SSI rate. Responders show a moderate rate of awareness of the recommendations about not removing hair, hair clipping, skin antisepsis with alcoholic solutions, and normothermia. Antibiotic prophylaxis is given for more than 24 h by 18.8% of respondents. Screening for S. aureus is performed by 27.6%. Hair removal by shaving is used by 16.6% of responders. The most common antiseptic solutions are alcoholic chlorhexidine (57.2%) and aqueous povidone (23.3%). 62.8% of surgeons allow the solution to air dry before applying surgical drapes. Adhesive drapes in the surgical field are used routinely in 33.4% of cases. Perioperative normothermia, glucose control and hyperoxia are used in 84.3%, 65.9% and 23.3% of cases. Antimicrobial sutures and negative pressure therapy are used by 20.2% and 43.5% of teams, respectively. Prior to closing the incision, 83.9% replace surgical instruments always or selectively. Wound irrigation before closing is used in 78.1% of cases, mostly with saline. Check-lists, standardized orders, surveillance, feed-back and educational programs were rated most highly by respondents as a means to improve compliance with preventative guidelines, but few of these strategies were in place at their institutions.

CONCLUSION

Gaps in the translation of evidence into practice remain in the prevention of SSI among different surgical specialities. Several areas for improvement have been identified, as some core prevention measures are not in common use.

摘要

背景

尽管已经发布了外科部位感染(SSI)预防指南,但理论措施与实际执行之间仍存在差距。在规划传播策略之前,准确评估预防措施的实施情况至关重要。

方法

我们向 11 个手术护士和外科医生协会的成员分发了一项基于网络的调查。这些问题旨在确定他们对证据、个人信念和主要预防措施实际使用情况的认识。

结果

在 1105 名应答者中,有 50.5%的人没有收到 SSI 发生率的反馈。应答者对有关不脱毛、剪毛、酒精溶液皮肤消毒和体温正常的建议有中等程度的认识。18.8%的应答者给予抗生素预防超过 24 小时。27.6%的人进行金黄色葡萄球菌筛查。16.6%的应答者使用剃毛去除毛发。最常用的消毒剂是酒精氯己定(57.2%)和水溶聚维酮(23.3%)。62.8%的外科医生在铺手术单前允许消毒剂风干。在 33.4%的情况下,常规使用手术部位的粘性手术单。围手术期体温正常、血糖控制和高氧血症分别在 84.3%、65.9%和 23.3%的病例中使用。抗菌缝线和负压治疗分别在 20.2%和 43.5%的团队中使用。在关闭切口之前,83.9%的人始终或选择性地更换手术器械。在 78.1%的病例中,在关闭切口前使用冲洗液冲洗伤口,主要使用生理盐水。应答者认为检查表、标准化医嘱、监测、反馈和教育计划是提高预防指南依从性的最佳方法,但这些策略在他们的机构中很少实施。

结论

不同外科专业预防 SSI 的实践中,证据转化为实践的差距仍然存在。已经确定了一些需要改进的领域,因为一些核心预防措施并未得到广泛应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验