Suppr超能文献

取消自付费用对德国巴伐利亚州以全科医生为中心的医疗协调的影响:对常规收集的索赔数据的分析

Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data.

作者信息

Olm Michaela, Donnachie Ewan, Tauscher Martin, Gerlach Roman, Linde Klaus, Maier Werner, Schwettmann Lars, Schneider Antonius

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Munich, Germany

Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 2;10(9):e035575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035575.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 2012, Germany abolished copayment for consultations in ambulatory care. This study investigated the effect of the abolition on general practitioner (GP)-centred coordination of care. We assessed how the proportion of patients with coordinated specialist care changed over time when copayment to all specialist services were removed. Furthermore, we studied how the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent 'doctor shopping' changed after the abolition.

DESIGN

A retrospective routine data analysis of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, comparing the years 2011 and 2012 (with copayment), with the period from 2013 to 2016 (without copayment). Therefore, time series analyses covering 24 quarters were performed.

SETTING

Primary care in Bavaria, Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

All statutorily insured patients in Bavaria, aged ≥18 years, with at least one ambulatory specialist contact between 2011 and 2016.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with GP-coordinated care (every regular specialist consultation within a quarter was preceded by a GP referral). Secondary outcomes were the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent 'doctor shopping'.

RESULTS

After the abolition, the proportion of coordinated patients decreased from 49.6% (2011) to 15.5% (2016). Overall, younger patients and those living in areas with lower levels of deprivation showed the lowest proportions of coordination, which further decreased after abolition. Additionally, there were concomitant increases in the number of ambulatory emergency contacts and to a lesser extent in the number of patients with apparent 'doctor shopping'.

CONCLUSIONS

The abolition of copayment in Germany was associated with a substantial decrease in GP coordination of specialist care. This suggests that the copayment was a partly effective tool to support coordinated care. Future studies are required to investigate how the gatekeeping function of GPs in Germany can best be strengthened while minimising the associated administrative overhead.

摘要

目的

2012年,德国取消了门诊护理咨询的自付费用。本研究调查了取消自付费用对以全科医生(GP)为中心的护理协调的影响。我们评估了取消所有专科服务的自付费用后,接受协调专科护理的患者比例随时间的变化情况。此外,我们研究了取消自付费用后门诊急诊病例数量和明显的“换医行为”如何变化。

设计

对巴伐利亚法定医疗保险医生协会进行回顾性常规数据分析,比较2011年和2012年(有自付费用)与2013年至2016年期间(无自付费用)的情况。因此,进行了涵盖24个季度的时间序列分析。

背景

德国巴伐利亚的初级医疗保健。

参与者

巴伐利亚所有年龄≥18岁、在2011年至2016年期间至少有一次门诊专科就诊的法定参保患者。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局是接受全科医生协调护理的患者百分比(一个季度内每次定期专科会诊之前均有全科医生转诊)。次要结局是门诊急诊病例数量和明显的“换医行为”。

结果

取消自付费用后,接受协调护理的患者比例从49.6%(2011年)降至15.5%(2016年)。总体而言,年轻患者和生活在贫困程度较低地区的患者的协调护理比例最低,取消自付费用后进一步下降。此外,门诊急诊就诊次数随之增加,明显“换医”的患者数量也有一定程度增加。

结论

德国取消自付费用与全科医生对专科护理的协调大幅减少有关。这表明自付费用是支持协调护理的一种部分有效的工具。未来需要开展研究,以探讨如何在尽量减少相关行政负担的同时,最佳地加强德国全科医生的守门功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/7470646/585007e1aca1/bmjopen-2019-035575f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验