• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文患者面部表情分类处理中快乐面孔的偏差对抑郁症的影响。

Biases of Happy Faces in Face Classification Processing of Depression in Chinese Patients.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Education, Heilongjiang University, China.

Department of Child Health Care, Maternity and Child Healthcare, Hospital of Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Neural Plast. 2020 Aug 17;2020:7235734. doi: 10.1155/2020/7235734. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/7235734
PMID:32879624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7448107/
Abstract

We explored the face classification processing mechanism in depressed patients, especially the biases of happy faces in face classification processing of depression. Thirty patients with the first episode of depression at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were selected as the depression group, while healthy people matched for age, gender, and educational level were assigned to the control group. The Hamilton Depression Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Scale were used to select the subjects; then, we used the forced face classification paradigm to collect behavioral (response time and accuracy) and event-related potential (ERP) data of the subjects. The differences between the groups were estimated using a repeated measurement analysis of variance. The total response time of classified faces in the depression group was longer than that in the control group, the correct rate was lower, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). N170 component analysis demonstrated that the latency of the depression group was prolonged, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). When classifying happy faces, the depressed patients demonstrated a decrease in N170 amplitude and a prolongation of latency in some brain regions compared with the healthy individuals. The cognitive bias in depression may be due to prolonged processing of positive facial information and difficulty in producing positive emotional responses.

摘要

我们探讨了抑郁症患者的面部分类处理机制,特别是在抑郁患者对面部分类处理中对快乐面孔的偏见。选取哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院首发抑郁症患者 30 例作为抑郁症组,按年龄、性别、文化程度相匹配的健康人作为对照组。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表和汉密尔顿焦虑量表进行入组筛选,然后采用强制性面孔分类范式收集被试的行为(反应时和准确率)和事件相关电位(ERP)数据。采用重复测量方差分析估计组间差异。与对照组相比,抑郁症组分类面孔的总反应时延长,准确率降低,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。N170 成分分析表明,抑郁症组潜伏期延长,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。在分类快乐面孔时,与健康个体相比,抑郁症患者在一些脑区的 N170 振幅减小,潜伏期延长。抑郁症患者的认知偏差可能是由于对正面面部信息的处理时间延长,以及产生积极情绪反应的困难所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/6357b0b41f95/NP2020-7235734.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/30f234df00e6/NP2020-7235734.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/48f462529ff4/NP2020-7235734.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/6357b0b41f95/NP2020-7235734.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/30f234df00e6/NP2020-7235734.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/48f462529ff4/NP2020-7235734.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a9/7448107/6357b0b41f95/NP2020-7235734.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Biases of Happy Faces in Face Classification Processing of Depression in Chinese Patients.中文患者面部表情分类处理中快乐面孔的偏差对抑郁症的影响。
Neural Plast. 2020 Aug 17;2020:7235734. doi: 10.1155/2020/7235734. eCollection 2020.
2
Distinct facial processing related negative cognitive bias in first-episode and recurrent major depression: evidence from the N170 ERP component.首发和复发性重度抑郁症中与面部加工相关的独特负性认知偏差:来自N170事件相关电位成分的证据
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e109176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109176. eCollection 2014.
3
Cognitive Bias by Gender Interaction on N170 Response to Emotional Facial Expressions in Major and Minor Depression.重度和轻度抑郁症中性别交互作用对N170情绪面部表情反应的认知偏差
Brain Topogr. 2016 Mar;29(2):232-42. doi: 10.1007/s10548-015-0444-4. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Early processing of emotional faces in a Go/NoGo task: lack of N170 right-hemispheric specialisation in children with major depression.在“是/否”任务中对情绪面孔的早期加工:重度抑郁症患儿缺乏N170右半球特异性
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015 Sep;122(9):1339-52. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1411-7. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
5
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.糟糕的是:社交焦虑中对愤怒面孔的偏向会干扰身份识别过程。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
6
Attention modulates facial expression processing in subsyndromal depression: A behavioral and ERP study.注意调节亚综合征抑郁的面部表情加工:一项行为和 ERP 研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2024 Jul;201:112359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112359. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Faces emotional expressions: from perceptive to motor areas in aged and young subjects.感知到运动区域:老年人和年轻人面对面部情绪表达。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov 1;126(5):1642-1652. doi: 10.1152/jn.00328.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
8
The recognition of dynamic-emotional faces in individuals with high and low social anxiety: An ERP study.高社交焦虑和低社交焦虑个体对动态情绪面孔的识别:一项 ERP 研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2022 Jan 18;768:136360. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136360. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
Early perceptual anomaly of negative facial expression in depression: An event-related potential study.抑郁症中负面面部表情的早期知觉异常:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Dec;45(6):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
Cognitive behavioural therapy attenuates the enhanced early facial stimuli processing in social anxiety disorders: an ERP investigation.认知行为疗法可减弱社交焦虑障碍患者早期对面部刺激的过度加工:一项 ERP 研究。
Behav Brain Funct. 2017 Jul 28;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12993-017-0130-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting working memory efficiency across adulthood: the role of enhancement and suppression attentional mechanisms, moderated by age and other factors.预测成年期的工作记忆效率:增强和抑制注意机制的作用,受年龄和其他因素调节。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 28;37(1):174. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03059-8.
2
Disrupted properties of functional brain networks in major depressive disorder during emotional face recognition: an EEG study via graph theory analysis.通过图论分析的脑电图研究:重度抑郁症患者在情绪面孔识别过程中功能性脑网络属性的破坏
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 13;18:1338765. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1338765. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Myofascial Unwinding and Myofascial Release Technique in a Patient with Somatic Symptoms - A Case Report.肌筋膜松解术和肌筋膜释放技术对一名躯体症状患者的疗效——病例报告
Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;39(2):199-201. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.203113.
2
Facial emotion recognition, theory of mind and the role of facial mimicry in depression.面部表情识别、心理理论以及面部模仿在抑郁症中的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Biased processing of neutral facial expressions is associated with depressive symptoms and suicide ideation in individuals at risk for major depression due to affective temperaments.
Development and application of emotion recognition technology - a systematic literature review.
情感识别技术的发展与应用——系统文献综述。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 24;12(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01581-4.
4
The Neural Correlates of the Recognition of Emotional Intensity Deficits in Major Depression: An ERP Study.重度抑郁症中情绪强度识别缺陷的神经关联:一项事件相关电位研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Jan 12;19:117-131. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S393264. eCollection 2023.
5
Positive Classification Advantage of Categorizing Emotional Faces in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症患者对情绪面孔进行分类的积极分类优势
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:734405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.734405. eCollection 2022.
6
Facial Expression Recognition and ReHo Analysis in Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症中的面部表情识别与局部一致性分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 22;12:688376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688376. eCollection 2021.
由于情感气质而有患重度抑郁症风险的个体,对中性面部表情的偏向性处理与抑郁症状和自杀意念有关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;55(3):518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
More excited for negative facial expressions in depression: evidence from an event-related potential study.在抑郁症中对负性面部表情更为兴奋:来自事件相关电位研究的证据。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Nov;123(11):2172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
5
Sad benefit in face working memory: an emotional bias of melancholic depression.面容工作记忆中的悲伤获益:单相抑郁的情绪偏向。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Dec;135(1-3):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
6
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans.人类面部感知的电生理研究
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Nov;8(6):551-565. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551.
7
Stable expression recognition abnormalities in unipolar depression.单相抑郁中稳定的表达识别异常。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Aug 30;179(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.05.015. Epub 2010 May 15.
8
Judging the intensity of facial expressions of emotion: depression-related biases in the processing of positive affect.判断面部情绪表达的强度:积极情绪加工中与抑郁相关的偏差
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):223-8. doi: 10.1037/a0014658.
9
Identifying differences in biased affective information processing in major depression.识别重度抑郁症中偏向性情感信息处理的差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2008 May 30;159(1-2):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.011. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
10
Neural correlates of affective processing in response to sad and angry facial stimuli in patients with major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者对悲伤和愤怒面部刺激的情感加工的神经关联
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 1;32(3):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.12.009. Epub 2007 Dec 23.