Department of Pediatric Oncology and Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Nov;67(11):e28611. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28611. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
We systematically reviewed outcome assessment methods, outcome classification, and severity grading of reported outcomes in studies investigating the burden of physical long-term morbidity in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). A MEDLINE and EMBASE search identified 56 studies reporting on three or more types of health conditions in 5-year CCS, for which information was extracted on outcome types and classification, methods of outcome ascertainment, and severity grading. There was substantial variability in classification and types of health conditions reported and in methods of outcome ascertainment. Only 59% of the included studies applied severity grading, mainly the common terminology criteria of adverse events. This large variation in assessment and definition of the burden of physical long-term morbidity in CCS challenges interpretation, comparison, and pooling data across studies. Global collaboration is needed to standardize assessments and harmonize definitions of long-term physical morbidity and associated outcomes in childhood cancer survivorship research.
我们系统地回顾了评估方法、结局分类和严重程度分级在儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)的身体长期发病率的负担的研究报告中的应用。通过 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 检索,确定了 56 项研究报告了 5 年 CCS 中三种或三种以上健康状况的信息,对结局类型和分类、结局确定方法以及严重程度分级进行了提取。报告的健康状况的分类和类型以及结局确定方法存在很大差异。只有 59%的纳入研究应用了严重程度分级,主要是不良事件常用术语标准。CCS 身体长期发病率负担的评估和定义存在如此大的差异,给研究间的数据解释、比较和汇总带来了挑战。需要全球合作来规范评估并协调儿童癌症生存研究中与长期身体发病率相关的结局的定义。