Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb;47(2):295-315. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000948. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
We report 3 empirical studies that represent the first systematic attempt to explore the relationship between emotional and decisional forgiveness and intentional forgetting. On this basis, we propose a model that provides a credible explanation for the relationship between forgiveness and forgetting. Specifically, we propose that engaging in emotional forgiveness promotes the psychological distancing of an offense, such that victims construe the offense at a higher and more abstract level. This high-level construal, in turn, promotes larger intentional forgetting effects, which, in turn, promote increased emotional forgiveness. Our studies found that participants in an emotional forgiveness manipulation reported increased psychological distance and recalled more high-level construals than did participants in either a decisional or no-forgiveness manipulation (Study 1). Using the list-method directed forgetting paradigm, we found that participants in an emotional forgiveness manipulation showed larger forgetting effects for both offense-relevant and -irrelevant information using both hypothetical (Study 2) and real-life (Study 3) moral transgressions compared with participants in either decisional or no-forgiveness manipulations. The potential implications of these findings for coping with unpleasant episodes in our lives are considered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
我们报告了 3 项实证研究,这是首次系统地探索情感和决策宽恕与故意遗忘之间关系的尝试。在此基础上,我们提出了一个模型,为宽恕和遗忘之间的关系提供了一个可信的解释。具体来说,我们提出,情感上的宽恕会促进对冒犯的心理距离,从而使受害者从更高、更抽象的角度理解冒犯。这种高层次的理解反过来又促进了更大的故意遗忘效果,而更大的故意遗忘效果又促进了情感上的宽恕的增加。我们的研究发现,与决策或非宽恕组的参与者相比,进行情感宽恕的参与者报告说心理距离增加了,并且回忆起了更多的高层构建(研究 1)。使用列表法定向遗忘范式,我们发现,与决策或非宽恕组的参与者相比,进行情感宽恕的参与者在处理假设(研究 2)和现实生活(研究 3)中的道德冒犯时,对相关和不相关信息都表现出更大的遗忘效应。考虑了这些发现对我们生活中应对不愉快事件的潜在影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。