IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Apr;68(4):1131-1141. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3021480. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Ablation treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) remains challenging due to the absence of a 'ground truth' for atrial substrate characterization and the presence of multiple mechanisms driving the arrhythmia. We implemented an unsupervised classification to identify clusters of atrial electrograms (AEGs) with similar patterns, which were then validated by AEG-derived markers.
956 bipolar AEGs were collected from 11 persAF patients. CARTO variables (Biosense Webster; ICL, ACI and SCI) were used to create a 3D space, and subsequently used to perform an unsupervised classification with k-means. The characteristics of the identified groups were investigated using nine AEG-derived markers: sample entropy (SampEn), dominant frequency, organization index (OI), determinism, laminarity, recurrence rate (RR), peak-to-peak (PP) amplitude, cycle length (CL), and wave similarity (WS).
Five AEG classes with distinct characteristics were identified (F = 582, P<0.0001). The presence of fractionation increased from class 1 to 5, as reflected by the nine markers. Class 1 (25%) included organized AEGs with high WS, determinism, laminarity, and RR, and low SampEn. Class 5 (20%) comprised fractionated AEGs with in low WS, OI, determinism, laminarity, and RR, and in high SampEn. Classes 2 (12%), 3 (13%) and 4 (30%) suggested different degrees of AEG organization.
Our results expand and reinterpret the criteria used for automated AEG classification. The nine markers highlighted electrophysiological differences among the five classes found by the k-means, which could provide a more complete characterization of persAF substrate during ablation target identification in future clinical studies.
持续性心房颤动(persAF)的消融治疗仍然具有挑战性,因为缺乏心房基质特征的“真实基准”,并且存在多种驱动心律失常的机制。我们实施了一种无监督分类方法来识别具有相似模式的心房电图(AEG)簇,然后使用 AEG 衍生标志物对这些簇进行验证。
从 11 名持续性房颤患者中收集了 956 个双极 AEG。使用 CARTO 变量(Biosense Webster;ICL、ACI 和 SCI)创建 3D 空间,然后使用 k-均值进行无监督分类。使用九个 AEG 衍生标志物研究了所识别组的特征:样本熵(SampEn)、主导频率、组织指数(OI)、确定性、层状、复发率(RR)、峰峰值(PP)振幅、周期长度(CL)和波相似性(WS)。
确定了具有不同特征的 5 个 AEG 类(F = 582,P<0.0001)。九个标志物反映出,分数化从类 1 到 5 逐渐增加。类 1(25%)包括组织化的 AEG,具有高 WS、确定性、层状和 RR,以及低 SampEn。类 5(20%)由分数化的 AEG 组成,具有低 WS、OI、确定性、层状和 RR,以及高 SampEn。类 2(12%)、3(13%)和 4(30%)提示 AEG 组织化程度不同。
我们的结果扩展并重新解释了用于自动 AEG 分类的标准。九个标志物突出了 k-均值发现的五个类之间的电生理差异,这可能为未来临床研究中消融靶点识别期间持续性房颤基质提供更全面的特征描述。