Suppr超能文献

低海拔地区的肺功能测试可预测短期高海拔暴露后的肺压反应。

Pulmonary function tests at low altitude predict pulmonary pressure response to short-term high altitude exposure.

作者信息

Yang Yuanqi, Liu Chuan, Yu Shiyong, Qin Zhexue, Yang Jie, Bian Shizhu, Gao Xubin, Zhang Jihang, Hu Mingdong, Wu Guoming, Ding Xiaohan, Zhang Chen, Ke Jingbin, Yuan Fangzhengyuan, Tian Jingdu, He Chunyan, Rao Rongsheng, Huang Lan

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of PLA, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of PLA, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020 Nov;282:103534. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2020.103534. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Travelling to high altitude (HA) presents a risk of the high levels of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) at altitude, which is associated with impaired exercise capacity and fatal HA pulmonary oedema. However, prediction of high levels of PAP at altitude is still unclear.

METHODS

Echocardiography and pulmonary function tests were performed on 121 healthy men at low altitude (LA) and 4100 m (5 ± 2 h after a 7 day ascent).

RESULTS

HA exposure increased the levels of FEV1/FVC ratio, FEF, MMEF, mPAP, total pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP). More smokers and lower forced expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity (FEF) at LA were observed in subjects with mPAP≥30 mmHg than those with mPAP<30 mmHg at HA. Multivariate logistic regression identified that FEF at LA [odds ratio (OR) 0.50, 95%CI 0.33-0.76, p = 0.001] and smoking (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.31-7.27, p = 0.010) were the independent predictors for identifying subjects with mPAP≥30 mmHg at HA. Moreover, FEF at LA was linearly correlated with mPAP at HA (r = -0.31, p < 0.001), which mainly existed in smokers. Compared to subjects with FEF ≥7.55 L/sec at LA, those with FEF <7.55 L/sec at LA showed higher levels of mPAP, and total PVR, and a multivariable OR of 11.16 (95%CI, 3.48-35.81) for developing mPAP ≥ 30 mmHg at HA. However, there was no significant difference in the incidences of AMS and its related clinical symptoms in subjects with different levels of FEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, these findings suggest that subjects with low FEF values at LA are susceptible to high levels of PAP at altitude but not the incidence of AMS following short-term HA exposure, especially in smokers.

摘要

背景

前往高海拔地区(HA)存在海拔高度导致肺动脉压(PAP)升高的风险,这与运动能力受损和致命的高海拔肺水肿有关。然而,海拔高度时PAP升高的预测仍不明确。

方法

对121名低海拔(LA)健康男性和4100米海拔(7天攀登后5±2小时)的410名健康男性进行了超声心动图和肺功能测试。

结果

暴露于高海拔地区会使FEV1/FVC比值、FEF、MMEF、平均肺动脉压(mPAP)、总肺血管阻力(PVR)和收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)升高。与高海拔地区mPAP<30 mmHg的受试者相比,mPAP≥30 mmHg的受试者中吸烟者更多,且低海拔地区25%用力肺活量(FEF)时的用力呼气流量更低。多因素逻辑回归分析确定,低海拔地区的FEF[比值比(OR)0.50,95%置信区间(CI)0.33 - 0.76,p = 0.001]和吸烟(OR 3.09,95%CI 1.31 - 7.27,p = 0.010)是识别高海拔地区mPAP≥30 mmHg受试者的独立预测因素。此外,低海拔地区的FEF与高海拔地区的mPAP呈线性相关(r = -0.31,p < 0.001),这种情况主要存在于吸烟者中。与低海拔地区FEF≥7.55升/秒的受试者相比,低海拔地区FEF<7.55升/秒的受试者mPAP和总PVR水平更高,且高海拔地区发生mPAP≥30 mmHg的多变量OR为11.16(95%CI,3.48 - 35.81)。然而,不同FEF水平的受试者中急性高山病(AMS)及其相关临床症状的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

因此,这些研究结果表明,低海拔地区FEF值低的受试者在高海拔地区易出现PAP升高,但短期暴露于高海拔地区后急性高山病的发生率不受影响,尤其是吸烟者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验