• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症患者三叉神经痛的立体定向放射外科与射频消融治疗比较。

Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiofrequency Ablation for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;98(6):378-385. doi: 10.1159/000509315. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1159/000509315
PMID:32882698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis (MS-TN) patients is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment outcomes between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of MS-TN patients treated with SRS or RFA between 2002 and 2019. Outcomes included degree of pain relief, pain recurrence, and sensory changes, segregated based on initial treatment, final treatment following retreatment with the same modality, and crossover patients.

RESULTS

Sixty surgical cases for 42 MS-TN patients were reviewed. Initial pain freedom outcomes and rates of retreatment were similar (SRS: 30%; RFA: 42%). RFA resulted in faster onset of pain freedom (RFA: <1 week; SRS: 15 weeks; p < 0.001). SRS patients with pain relief had longer intervals to pain recurrence at 2 years (p = 0.044). Final treatment outcomes favored RFA for pain freedom/off-medication outcomes (RFA: 44%; SRS: 11%; p = 0.031), though RFA resulted in more paresthesia (RFA: 81%; SRS: 39%; p = 0.012). Both provided at least 80% of adequate pain relief. Crossover patients did not have improved pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS and RFA are both valid surgical options for MS-TN. Discussion with providers will need to balance patient preference with their unique treatment characteristics.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)相关药物难治性三叉神经痛(MS-TN)患者的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。

目的

比较立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)和射频消融(RFA)的治疗效果。

方法

我们对 2002 年至 2019 年间接受 SRS 或 RFA 治疗的 MS-TN 患者进行了回顾性研究。结局包括疼痛缓解程度、疼痛复发和感觉变化,根据初始治疗、同一方法的再次治疗后的最终治疗以及交叉治疗的患者进行分组。

结果

共回顾了 42 例 MS-TN 患者的 60 例手术病例。初始疼痛缓解率和再次治疗率相似(SRS:30%;RFA:42%)。RFA 更早缓解疼痛(RFA:<1 周;SRS:15 周;p<0.001)。SRS 患者缓解疼痛的时间间隔更长(p=0.044)。在 2 年时,最终治疗结局有利于 RFA 达到疼痛缓解/停药(RFA:44%;SRS:11%;p=0.031),但 RFA 会导致更多的感觉异常(RFA:81%;SRS:39%;p=0.012)。两种方法均能达到至少 80%的充分缓解。交叉治疗的患者疼痛缓解并无改善。

结论

SRS 和 RFA 均是治疗 MS-TN 的有效手术方法。在与患者沟通时,需要权衡患者的偏好与治疗的独特特点。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiofrequency Ablation for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.多发性硬化症患者三叉神经痛的立体定向放射外科与射频消融治疗比较。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;98(6):378-385. doi: 10.1159/000509315. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Prospective comparison of long-term pain relief rates after first-time microvascular decompression and stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.首次微血管减压术与立体定向放射外科治疗三叉神经痛后长期疼痛缓解率的前瞻性比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):68-77. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16149. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
3
Early radiosurgery provides superior pain relief for trigeminal neuralgia patients.早期放射外科手术能为三叉神经痛患者提供更好的疼痛缓解效果。
Neurology. 2015 Dec 15;85(24):2159-65. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002216. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
4
The Effectiveness of Percutaneous Balloon Compression, Thermocoagulation, and Glycerol Rhizolysis for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multiple Sclerosis.经皮球囊压迫、热凝和甘油根切术治疗多发性硬化性三叉神经痛的疗效。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):E684-E692. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz103.
5
Stereotactic radio surgery and radio frequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis: A single institution experience.立体定向放射外科手术和射频神经根切断术治疗多发性硬化症中的三叉神经痛:单机构经验
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;162:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
A proposed plan for personalized radiosurgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.针对三叉神经痛患者的个性化伽玛刀治疗计划。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):452-459. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS16747. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Trigeminal neuralgia pain relief after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery.伽玛刀立体定向放射外科手术后三叉神经痛的疼痛缓解
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;117:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
8
Management of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者药物难治性三叉神经痛的管理
Neurosurg Focus. 2005 May 15;18(5):e13. doi: 10.3171/foc.2005.18.5.14.
9
Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study.伽玛刀立体定向放射手术治疗多发性硬化继发三叉神经痛:一项病例对照研究。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Aug 1;93(2):453-461. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002440. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
10
The clinical significance of persistent trigeminal nerve contrast enhancement in patients who undergo repeat radiosurgery.接受重复放射外科手术的患者中三叉神经持续对比增强的临床意义。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):219-225. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16111. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.立体定向放射外科与神经根切断术治疗三叉神经痛的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 20;48(1):613. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03763-z.
2
Effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伽玛刀放射外科治疗多发性硬化相关三叉神经痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Dec 13;47(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02246-3.
3
Research trends and hotspots of neuropathic pain in neurodegenerative diseases: a bibliometric analysis.
神经退行性疾病相关神经性疼痛的研究趋势和热点:文献计量分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 12;14:1182411. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1182411. eCollection 2023.
4
Outcomes using linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A single-center, retrospective study.使用直线加速器立体定向放射外科治疗三叉神经痛的疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jun 10;13:246. doi: 10.25259/SNI_91_2022. eCollection 2022.