School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):689-699. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10184-1. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may be secondary to pharyngoesophageal diverticulum. Our objectives are to (1) highlight the heterogeneity in clinical presentation, (2) discuss pathophysiology and management, and (3) present a comprehensive literature review of these diverticula. All patients undergoing pharyngoesophageal diverticulum repair between 2013 and 2019 were identified. Cases with ACSS history underwent detailed review of clinical presentation, assessment, and management. Literature review and analysis of all reported ACSS-associated pharyngoesophageal diverticula was performed. Two hundred forty-three cases of pharyngoesophageal diverticulum repair were performed during the study period; 13 cases were ACSS-associated. Four types of clinical presentation were identified: (Type A) Spinal hardware present, with videofluoroscopic evidence of exposed hardware; (Type B) Spinal hardware present, without videofluoroscopic evidence of exposed hardware; (Type C) Spinal hardware absent due to prior spinal hardware removal or ACSS performed without hardware; and (Type D) Concurrent esophago-esophageal fistula (EEF) present. All of our cases were evaluated using modified barium swallow study and esophagoscopy and definitively managed with endoscopic diverticulotomy. Literature review identified 21 cases of ACSS-associated pharyngoesophageal diverticulum repair from 18 publications. The majority of cases were identified using barium esophagram (N = 18, 86%) and managed with open diverticulectomy (N = 19, 90%). There were no reports of EEF. ACSS-associated pharyngoesophageal diverticulum must be evaluated with fluoroscopy and endoscopy, which determine presentation type. Presentation type guides management. Esophageal perforation requires hardware removal and perforation repair with flap placement. Endoscopic diverticulotomy was found essential to definitive management.Level of Evidence: 4.
颈椎前路手术后吞咽困难(ACSS)可能继发于咽食管憩室。我们的目标是:(1)突出临床表现的异质性;(2)讨论病理生理学和管理;(3)对这些憩室进行全面的文献复习。确定了 2013 年至 2019 年期间接受咽食管憩室修复的所有患者。对有 ACSS 病史的病例进行了详细的临床表现、评估和管理回顾。对所有报告的与 ACSS 相关的咽食管憩室进行了文献回顾和分析。在研究期间共进行了 243 例咽食管憩室修复手术,其中 13 例与 ACSS 相关。确定了四种临床表现类型:(A型)脊柱硬件存在,有影像学证据显示暴露的硬件;(B 型)脊柱硬件存在,但影像学证据显示没有暴露的硬件;(C 型)由于先前的脊柱硬件移除或无硬件的 ACSS 导致脊柱硬件缺失;(D 型)同时存在食管-食管瘘(EEF)。我们所有的病例均采用改良钡餐吞咽研究和食管镜检查进行评估,并通过内镜憩室切开术进行明确治疗。文献复习从 18 篇文献中确定了 21 例与 ACSS 相关的咽食管憩室修复病例。大多数病例通过钡餐食管造影(N=18,86%)和开放性憩室切除术(N=19,90%)进行诊断和治疗。没有 EEF 的报道。ACSS 相关咽食管憩室必须通过荧光检查和内镜检查进行评估,以确定表现类型。表现类型指导治疗。食管穿孔需要去除硬件,并通过放置皮瓣修复穿孔。内镜憩室切开术被认为是明确治疗的必要手段。证据水平:4 级。