Hendriksen Marieke M A
KNAW - Humanities Cluster, Korte Spinhuissteeg 3, Amsterdam, 1012 GC, Netherlands.
Ber Wiss. 2020 Sep;43(3):313-322. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202000017.
Performative methods have been part of history of science research and education for at least three decades. Understood broadly, they cover every methodology in which a historian or philosopher of science engages in embodied interaction with sources, tools and materials that do not traditionally belong to historical research, with the aim of answering a historical research question. The question no longer appears to be whether performative methods have a place within history and philosophy of science research, but what their place is, could, or should be; when and how they can and cannot be used. Because although performative methods are seen as an enrichment of the field by many, their growing popularity also raises questions: what new insights and challenges has the increased use of performative methods in the history of science brought us? How has it changed the field? Should performative research methods become a mandatory part of the training of new generations of historians of science? In this special issue, historians and philosophers of science for whom performative methods play an important role in their work reflect on these questions from their own research and teaching practices.
表演性方法至少在三十年里一直是科学史研究与教育的一部分。从广义上理解,它们涵盖了每一种方法论,在这些方法论中,科学史学家或科学哲学家与传统上不属于历史研究的资料、工具和材料进行具体的互动,旨在回答一个历史研究问题。问题似乎不再是表演性方法在科学史和科学哲学研究中是否有一席之地,而是它们的位置是什么、可能是什么或应该是什么;何时以及如何能够或不能够使用它们。因为尽管许多人认为表演性方法丰富了该领域,但它们日益普及也引发了一些问题:在科学史中更多地使用表演性方法给我们带来了哪些新的见解和挑战?它如何改变了这个领域?表演性研究方法是否应该成为新一代科学史学家培训的必修部分?在本期特刊中,表演性方法在其工作中发挥重要作用的科学史学家和科学哲学家从他们自己的研究和教学实践出发,对这些问题进行了反思。