Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Centre de Crítics, Corporació Sanitària Universitària Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí 1, Sabadell, Spain.
Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1487-1493. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004515.
To evaluate the preload dependence of femoral maximal change in pressure over time (dP/dtmax) during volume expansion in preload dependent and independent critically ill patients.
Retrospective database analysis.
Two adult polyvalent ICUs.
Twenty-five critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure.
Thirty-five fluid infusions of 500 mL normal saline.
Changes in femoral dP/dtmax, systolic, diastolic, and pulse femoral arterial pressure were obtained from the pressure waveform analysis using the PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany). Stroke volume index was obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution. Statistical analysis was performed comparing results before and after volume expansion and according to the presence or absence of preload dependence (increases in stroke volume index ≥ 15%). Femoral dP/dtmax increased by 46% after fluid infusion in preload-dependent cases (mean change = 510.6 mm Hg·s; p = 0.005) and remained stable in preload-independent ones (mean change = 49.2 mm Hg·s; p = 0.114). Fluid-induced changes in femoral dP/dtmax correlated with fluid-induced changes in stroke volume index in preload-dependent cases (r = 0.618; p = 0.032), but not in preload-independent ones. Femoral dP/dtmax strongly correlated with pulse and systolic arterial pressures and with total arterial stiffness, regardless of the preload dependence status (r > 0.9 and p < 0.001 in all cases).
Femoral dP/dtmax increased with volume expansion in case of preload dependence but not in case of preload independence and was strongly related to pulse pressure and total arterial stiffness regardless of preload dependence status. Therefore, femoral dP/dtmax is not a load-independent marker of left ventricular contractility and should be not used to track contractility in critically ill patients.
评估在容量扩张期间依赖和不依赖前负荷的危重病患者股动脉最大压力变化率(dP/dtmax)的前负荷依赖性。
回顾性数据库分析。
两个成人综合 ICU。
25 例急性循环衰竭危重病患者。
35 次 500ml 生理盐水输注。
使用 PiCCO2 系统(德国菲尔德基希的普逊医疗系统公司)从压力波形分析中获得股动脉 dP/dtmax、收缩压、舒张压和脉搏股动脉压的变化。通过经肺热稀释法获得每搏量指数。比较容量扩张前后的结果,并根据是否存在前负荷依赖性(每搏量指数增加≥15%)进行统计分析。在依赖前负荷的情况下,液体输注后股动脉 dP/dtmax 增加了 46%(平均变化=510.6mmHg·s;p=0.005),而在不依赖前负荷的情况下则保持稳定(平均变化=49.2mmHg·s;p=0.114)。依赖前负荷的情况下,股动脉 dP/dtmax 的变化与每搏量指数的变化相关(r=0.618;p=0.032),但在不依赖前负荷的情况下则不相关。无论前负荷依赖状态如何,股动脉 dP/dtmax 与脉搏和收缩压以及总动脉僵硬度高度相关(在所有情况下 r>0.9,p<0.001)。
在依赖前负荷的情况下,股动脉 dP/dtmax 随容量扩张而增加,但在不依赖前负荷的情况下则不增加,并且与脉搏压和总动脉僵硬度密切相关,无论前负荷依赖状态如何。因此,股动脉 dP/dtmax 不是左心室收缩力的独立负荷标志物,不应用于监测危重病患者的收缩力。