PAION Deutschland GmbH, Martinstr. 10-12, 52062, Aachen, Germany.
Creative Clinical Research - CCR GmbH, Wallenroder Straße 7-9, 13435, Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;76(11):1505-1516. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02984-z. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
Remimazolam is a novel and ultra-short-acting sedative currently developed for intravenous use in procedural sedation, general anesthesia, and ICU sedation. However, intravenous administration is not always appropriate, depending on the patient or setting. This study evaluated intranasal administration as a potential alternative route.
The study used a randomized, double-blind, 9 period cross-over design to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of single intranasal doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg remimazolam (as powder or solution) with intranasal placebo and 4 mg intravenous remimazolam.
Intranasal remimazolam powder had a consistent absolute bioavailability of approximately 50%; T was 10 min; AUC and C were dose-proportional. The higher doses of intranasal solution, however, resulted in decreasing bioavailability and loss of dose-proportionality in AUC and C despite complete drug absorption due to partial swallowing of dose and the resulting first-pass effect. Pharmacodynamics were generally consistent with PK. Peak effects (drowsiness, relaxation, any, memory, response time) were in similar ranges after intranasal (10 to 40 mg) as intravenous (4 mg) dosing and were partially, but not consistently, dose-related. Safety results were generally consistent with other benzodiazepines; however, intranasal remimazolam (but not placebo) caused nasal discomfort/pain, in some cases even severe.
Intranasal administration of remimazolam was safe and caused sedative effects. However, the severe pain and discomfort caused by intranasal remimazolam prohibit its use by this route of administration, at least with the currently available intravenous formulation.
雷米唑仑是一种新型的超短效镇静剂,目前正在开发用于程序镇静、全身麻醉和 ICU 镇静的静脉内使用。然而,根据患者或环境的不同,静脉给药并不总是合适的。本研究评估了经鼻给药作为一种潜在的替代途径。
该研究采用随机、双盲、9 期交叉设计,比较了 10、20 和 40mg 雷米唑仑(粉末或溶液)单次经鼻给药与经鼻安慰剂和 4mg 静脉雷米唑仑的药代动力学、药效学和安全性。
经鼻雷米唑仑粉末的绝对生物利用度约为 50%;T 为 10 分钟;AUC 和 C 与剂量成比例。然而,较高剂量的经鼻溶液由于部分吞咽剂量和由此产生的首过效应导致生物利用度降低和 AUC 和 C 的剂量比例失调,尽管药物完全吸收。药效学与 PK 基本一致。经鼻(10 至 40mg)和静脉(4mg)给药后的峰值效应(嗜睡、放松、任何、记忆、反应时间)均处于相似范围内,且部分但不始终与剂量相关。安全性结果与其他苯二氮䓬类药物基本一致;然而,经鼻雷米唑仑(而非安慰剂)引起鼻不适/疼痛,在某些情况下甚至严重。
经鼻给予雷米唑仑是安全的,并引起镇静作用。然而,经鼻雷米唑仑引起的严重疼痛和不适禁止其通过该途径给药,至少在目前可获得的静脉制剂中是如此。