Naso Julia R, Yang Hui-Min, Schaeffer David F
From the Division of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;145(3):343-351. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0124-OA.
CONTEXT.—: Serosal involvement (pT4a category) and lymphovascular invasion have prognostic significance in colorectal carcinoma, but are subject to interobserver variation in assessment.
OBJECTIVES.—: To provide the first large-scale assessment of interobserver variability in pT4a category and lymphovascular invasion reporting in real-world practice and to explore the impact of information from guidelines on variability in reporting these features.
DESIGN.—: Analysis of 1555 consecutive synoptic reports of colorectal carcinoma was performed using multivariate logistic regression. Interobserver variability before and after the presentation of guideline information was assessed using an image-based survey.
RESULTS.—: Significant differences in the odds of reporting pT4a versus pT3 category, detecting lymphovascular invasion of any type, and detecting large vessel invasion were identified among hospital sites and for individual pathologists compared with the median pathologist at the same site. Consistent with these results, interobserver agreement was only moderate in the image-based survey regarding T4a staging and lymphovascular invasion (all κ ≤ 0.57). The provision of information from guidelines did not tend to increase interobserver agreement in the survey, though responses in favor of using an elastic stain increased following recommendations for their use. However, when observers were provided with elastic-stained images, interobserver agreement remained only moderate (κ = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS.—: Real-world reporting of pT4a category and lymphovascular invasion shows substantial variability at both local and regional levels. Our study underscores the need to address these features in quality initiatives, and provides a novel method through which existing synoptic data can be harnessed to monitor reporting patterns and provide individualized feedback.
浆膜受累(pT4a 类别)和淋巴管侵犯在结直肠癌中具有预后意义,但在评估中存在观察者间差异。
对实际临床中 pT4a 类别和淋巴管侵犯报告的观察者间变异性进行首次大规模评估,并探讨指南信息对这些特征报告变异性的影响。
使用多变量逻辑回归分析 1555 份连续的结直肠癌概要报告。通过基于图像的调查评估指南信息呈现前后的观察者间变异性。
与同一机构的中位病理学家相比,不同医院机构以及个体病理学家在报告 pT4a 与 pT3 类别、检测任何类型的淋巴管侵犯以及检测大血管侵犯的几率上存在显著差异。与这些结果一致,在基于图像的调查中,关于 T4a 分期和淋巴管侵犯的观察者间一致性仅为中等(所有κ≤0.57)。指南信息的提供并未倾向于增加调查中的观察者间一致性,尽管在推荐使用弹性染色后,支持使用弹性染色的回复有所增加。然而,当为观察者提供弹性染色图像时,观察者间一致性仍然仅为中等(κ = 0.55)。
pT4a 类别和淋巴管侵犯的实际临床报告在地方和区域层面均显示出显著的变异性。我们的研究强调了在质量改进措施中解决这些特征的必要性,并提供了一种新方法,通过该方法可以利用现有的概要数据来监测报告模式并提供个性化反馈。