• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,2 型糖尿病患者的HbA 变异性与支架内再狭窄相关。

Visit-to-visit HbA variability is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Road II, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 4;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01111-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12933-020-01111-7
PMID:32887588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7472579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with type 2 diabetes are under substantially higher risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary stent implantation. We sought to investigate whether visit-to-visit HbA variability is a potential predictor of ISR in diabetic patients after stent implantation.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled type 2 diabetic patients who underwent successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention and performed follow-up coronary angiography after around 12 months. The incidence of ISR and its relationship with visit-to-visit HbA variability, expressed as coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD) and variability independent of the mean (VIM), were studied. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to analyze the predictive value of HbA variability for ISR.

RESULTS

From September 2014 to July 2018 in Ruijin Hospital, a total of 420 diabetic patients (688 lesions) after stent implantation were included in the final analysis. During a mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 1.3 months, the incidence of ISR was 8.6%, which was significantly increased in patients with higher CV of HbA (P = 0.001). The mean diameter stenosis (DS), net luminal loss and net luminal gain were 22.9 ± 16.8%, 0.42 ± 0.88 mm and 1.66 ± 0.83 mm, respectively. Greater DS was observed in subjects with higher tertiles of CV of HbA (P < 0.001), and this trend was more prominent in patients with optimal glycemic control (HbA ≤ 7%) in the baseline. In multivariate analysis, HbA variability was independently associated with incidence of ISR after adjustment for traditional risk factors and mean HbA (HR: 3.00 [95% CI 1.14-7.92] for highest vs. lowest tertile). Inclusion of CV of HbA led to a better risk stratification accuracy. Assessing HbA variability by SD or VIM yielded similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that visit-to-visit HbA variability is an independent predictor of incidence of ISR in patients with type 2 diabetes after stent implantation. Trial registration NCT02089360: NCT.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病患者在冠状动脉支架植入术后发生支架内再狭窄(ISR)的风险显著增加。我们旨在探讨支架植入术后患者的 HbA 变异是否是 ISR 的潜在预测因素。

方法

我们连续纳入了 2014 年 9 月至 2018 年 7 月在瑞金医院成功接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并在大约 12 个月后进行随访冠状动脉造影的 2 型糖尿病患者。研究了 ISR 的发生率及其与 HbA 变异的关系,HbA 变异以变异系数(CV)、标准差(SD)和均值独立变异(VIM)表示。构建多变量 Cox 比例风险模型分析 HbA 变异对 ISR 的预测价值。

结果

在瑞金医院,共纳入了 420 名支架植入术后的糖尿病患者(688 处病变),最终进行了分析。在平均 12.8±1.3 个月的随访期间,ISR 的发生率为 8.6%,HbA 的 CV 较高的患者发生率显著增加(P=0.001)。平均直径狭窄(DS)、净管腔丢失和净管腔获得分别为 22.9±16.8%、0.42±0.88mm 和 1.66±0.83mm。CV 较高的患者中,DS 较大(P<0.001),且在基线时血糖控制较好(HbA≤7%)的患者中,这一趋势更为明显。在多变量分析中,在调整了传统危险因素和平均 HbA 后,HbA 变异与 ISR 的发生独立相关(最高 vs. 最低三分位 HR:3.00[95%CI 1.14-7.92])。纳入 HbA 的 CV 可提高风险分层的准确性。使用 SD 或 VIM 评估 HbA 变异可得出类似的结果。

结论

本研究表明,支架植入术后患者的 HbA 变异是 2 型糖尿病患者发生 ISR 的独立预测因素。试验注册 NCT02089360:NCT.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/82e2b729caf6/12933_2020_1111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/0d20ce98c100/12933_2020_1111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/572f7fd9ea63/12933_2020_1111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/82e2b729caf6/12933_2020_1111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/0d20ce98c100/12933_2020_1111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/572f7fd9ea63/12933_2020_1111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/7472579/82e2b729caf6/12933_2020_1111_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Visit-to-visit HbA variability is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,2 型糖尿病患者的HbA 变异性与支架内再狭窄相关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 4;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01111-7.
2
Remnant lipoproteins play an important role of in-stent restenosis in type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-centre observational cohort study.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,残脂蛋白在支架内再狭窄中起重要作用:一项单中心观察性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0819-z.
3
The characteristics and risk factors of in-stent restenosis in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: what can we do.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者支架内再狭窄的特征和危险因素:我们能做些什么。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01798-2.
4
Visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability is associated with left ventricular adverse remodeling in diabetic patients with STEMI.在 STEMI 合并糖尿病患者中,随访间空腹血糖变异性与左心室不良重构相关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 2;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01112-6.
5
Impact of anemia on in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.贫血对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02355-1.
6
Risk factors for revascularization and in-stent restenosis in patients with triple-vessel disease after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: a retrospective analysis.二代药物洗脱支架置入术后三血管病变患者血运重建和支架内再狭窄的危险因素:回顾性分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 17;21(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02259-0.
7
Risk factors of in-stent restenosis among coronary artery disease patients with syphilis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study.梅毒感染经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者支架内再狭窄的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 15;21(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02245-6.
8
Triglyceride-glucose index is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.三酰甘油-葡萄糖指数与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架后急性冠状动脉综合征患者支架内再狭窄相关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jul 8;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01332-4.
9
Influence of insulin resistance on in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation after long-term angiographic follow-up.长期血管造影随访后,胰岛素抵抗对接受冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入患者支架内再狭窄的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2015 Jan;26(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000170.
10
Blood Pressure Levels at the Time of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis.经皮冠状动脉血运重建时的血压水平与冠状动脉支架内再狭窄风险
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;29(4):509-18. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv131. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Glycosylated Hemoglobin Variability and the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.糖化血红蛋白变异性与 2 型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度的关系。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Aug 1;2024:9958586. doi: 10.1155/2024/9958586. eCollection 2024.
2
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma Predicts Carotid in-Stent Restenosis: Development and Validation of a Nomogram.血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数可预测颈动脉支架内再狭窄:列线图的构建与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 25;17:263-274. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S447008. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of hemoglobin A1c management levels on coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute glycemic variability on admission predicts the prognosis in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.入院时急性血糖变异性可预测冠心病住院患者的预后:一项荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2020 Mar;67(3):526-534. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-02150-1. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
2
Variability in Glycated Hemoglobin and Risk of Poor Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Primary Care Cohort Study.大型初级保健队列研究中 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的变异性与不良结局风险的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Dec;42(12):2237-2246. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0848. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Insulin resistance and dysglycemia are associated with left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in non-diabetic patients.
糖化血红蛋白管理水平对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者冠状动脉血流储备分数的影响。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Mar;15(3):336-345. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14114. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Long-term glycemic variability predicts compromised development of heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a cohort study.长期血糖变异性可预测射血分数改善型心力衰竭的发展受损:一项队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 20;14:1211954. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1211954. eCollection 2023.
5
Intensified glycemic control by HbA1c for patients with coronary heart disease and Type 2 diabetes: a review of findings and conclusions.糖化血红蛋白强化控制对冠心病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:研究结果与结论回顾。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Jun 22;22(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01875-8.
6
Triglyceride-glucose index level and variability and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational cohort study.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数水平及其变异性与行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者结局的关系:一项观察性队列研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2022 Dec 8;21(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12944-022-01731-w.
7
Glycaemic variability and risk of adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome.血糖变异性与急性冠状动脉综合征不良心血管事件风险。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2022 Nov-Dec;19(6):14791641221137736. doi: 10.1177/14791641221137736.
8
Prognostic value of plasma phenylalanine and gut microbiota-derived metabolite phenylacetylglutamine in coronary in-stent restenosis.血浆苯丙氨酸和肠道微生物群衍生代谢物苯乙酰谷氨酰胺在冠状动脉支架内再狭窄中的预后价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 30;9:944155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.944155. eCollection 2022.
9
The Level of HbA1c Evaluates the Extent of Coronary Atherosclerosis Lesions and the Prognosis in Diabetes with Acute Coronary Syndrome.糖化血红蛋白水平评估急性冠脉综合征糖尿病患者冠状动脉粥样硬化病变程度及预后。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 22;2022:7796809. doi: 10.1155/2022/7796809. eCollection 2022.
10
Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents? .接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的血糖控制:新型抗糖尿病药物的作用是什么?
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 30;23(13):7261. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137261.
胰岛素抵抗和糖代谢异常与非糖尿病患者心肌梗死后左心室重构有关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Aug 7;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0904-3.
4
MicroRNA-33 and SIRT1 influence the coronary thrombus burden in hyperglycemic STEMI patients.miRNA-33 和 SIRT1 影响高血糖性 STEMI 患者的冠脉血栓负担。
J Cell Physiol. 2020 Feb;235(2):1438-1452. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29064. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Impact of post-procedural glycemic variability on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a post hoc cohort analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后血糖变异性对心血管发病率和死亡率的影响:一项事后队列分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 11;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0831-3.
6
Adiponectin and insulin resistance are related to restenosis and overall new PCI in subjects with normal glucose tolerance: the prospective AIRE Study.脂联素和胰岛素抵抗与糖耐量正常患者的再狭窄和总体新 PCI 相关:前瞻性 AIRE 研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 4;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0826-0.
7
Effects of Metformin Therapy on Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Prediabetes With Stable Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Stenosis: The CODYCE Multicenter Prospective Study.二甲双胍治疗对稳定型心绞痛伴非阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的糖尿病前期患者冠状动脉内皮功能障碍的影响:CODYCE 多中心前瞻性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1946-1955. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2356. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Glycemic Variability Is a Powerful Independent Predictive Factor of Midterm Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Diabetes With Acute Coronary Syndrome.血糖变异性是急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者中期主要不良心脏事件的强有力独立预测因素。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):674-681. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2047. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Remnant lipoproteins play an important role of in-stent restenosis in type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-centre observational cohort study.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,残脂蛋白在支架内再狭窄中起重要作用:一项单中心观察性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0819-z.
10
Visit-to-Visit Glycemic Variability and Risks of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality: The ALLHAT Study.随访间血糖变异性与心血管事件及全因死亡率的关系:ALLHAT 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):486-493. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1430. Epub 2019 Jan 18.