• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院容量对肝癌切除术后抢救失败的影响:来自意大利 HE.RC.O.LE.S. 登记处的分析。

The Impact of Hospital Volume on Failure to Rescue after Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis from the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Italian Registry.

机构信息

Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS" Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Surgery, SanGerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):840-846. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004327.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004327
PMID:32889868
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate correlation between centers' volume and incidence of failure to rescue (FTR) following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

FTR, defined as the probability of postoperative death among patients with major complication, has been proposed to assess quality of care during hospitalization. Perioperative management is challenging in cirrhotic patients and the ability to recognize and treat a complication may be fundamental to rescue patients from the risk of death.

METHODS

Patients undergoing liver resection for HCC between 2008 and 2018 in 18 Centers enrolled in the He.Rc.O.Le.S. Italian register. Early results included major complications (Clavien ≥3), 90-day mortality, and FTR and were analyzed according to center's volume.

RESULTS

Among 1935 included patients, major complication rate was 9.4% (8.6%, 12.3%, and 7.0% for low-, intermediate- and high-volume centers, respectively, P = 0.001). Ninety-day mortality rate was 2.6% (3.7%, 4.2% and 0.9% for low-, intermediate- and high-volume centers, respectively, P < 0.001). FTR was significantly higher at low- and intermediate-volume centers (28.6% and 26.5%, respectively) than at high-volume centers (6.1%, P = 0.002). Independent predictors for major complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >2, portal hypertension, intraoperative blood transfusions, and center's volume. Independent predictors for 90-day mortality were ASA >2, Child-Pugh score B, BCLC stage B-C, and center's volume. Center's volume and BCLC stage were strongly associated with FTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of major complications and mortality was related with comorbidities, cirrhosis severity, and complexity of surgery. These factors were not correlated with FTR. Center's volume was the only independent predictor related with severe complications, mortality, and FTR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估肝癌肝切除术后中心手术量与治疗失败率(FTR)之间的相关性。

背景资料概要

FTR 定义为术后发生主要并发症患者的死亡概率,用于评估住院期间的医疗质量。在肝硬化患者中,围手术期管理具有挑战性,识别和治疗并发症的能力对于患者免于死亡风险至关重要。

方法

纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年间在意大利 He.Rc.O.Le.S.注册中心接受肝癌肝切除术的 18 个中心的 1935 例患者。早期结果包括主要并发症(Clavien ≥3)、90 天死亡率和 FTR,并根据中心的手术量进行分析。

结果

在纳入的 1935 例患者中,主要并发症发生率为 9.4%(低、中、高手术量中心分别为 8.6%、12.3%和 7.0%,P=0.001)。90 天死亡率分别为 2.6%(低、中、高手术量中心分别为 3.7%、4.2%和 0.9%,P<0.001)。低和中手术量中心的 FTR 显著高于高手术量中心(分别为 28.6%和 26.5%,P=0.002)。主要并发症的独立预测因素为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分>2、门脉高压、术中输血和中心手术量。90 天死亡率的独立预测因素为 ASA 评分>2、Child-Pugh 评分 B、BCLC 分期 B-C 和中心手术量。中心手术量和 BCLC 分期与 FTR 强烈相关。

结论

主要并发症和死亡率的风险与合并症、肝硬化严重程度和手术复杂性相关。这些因素与 FTR 无关。中心手术量是与严重并发症、死亡率和 FTR 相关的唯一独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Hospital Volume on Failure to Rescue after Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis from the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Italian Registry.医院容量对肝癌切除术后抢救失败的影响:来自意大利 HE.RC.O.LE.S. 登记处的分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):840-846. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004327.
2
Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after rectal surgery: The Italian experience.未能抢救是直肠手术后医院死亡率差异的一个来源:意大利的经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1219-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Impact of hospital volume on patient safety indicators and failure to rescue following open aortic aneurysm repair.医院容量对开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后患者安全指标和抢救失败的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1135-1146.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.194. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer.医院规模和外科医生手术量对肝癌肝切除患者抢救失败的相对影响。
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1004-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.中心病例量与心胸外科协会定义的心脏手术抢救失败有关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):165-174.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 20.
6
Effects of hospital safety-net burden and hospital volume on failure to rescue after open abdominal aortic surgery.医院安全网负担和医院手术量对开放性腹主动脉手术后抢救失败的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.146. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Failure-to-rescue in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy: Is Hospital Volume a Standard for Quality Improvement Programs? Nationwide Analysis of 12,333 Patients.胰腺切除术患者的抢救失败:医院容量是否是质量改进计划的标准?对 12333 名患者的全国性分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):799-807. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002945.
8
Association of hospital volume with patient selection, risk of complications, and mortality from failure to rescue after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.医院容量与患者选择、并发症风险以及开放腹主动脉瘤修复后未能抢救的死亡率之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1681-1690.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.044. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
9
The Cost of Failure: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Rescuing Patients from Major Complications After Liver Resection Using the National Inpatient Sample.失败的代价:利用国家住院患者样本评估肝切除术后挽救患者重大并发症的成本效益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Oct;22(10):1688-1696. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3826-6. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
Failure to rescue in the era of the lung allocation score: The impact of center volume.肺分配评分时代的救援失败:中心容量的影响。
Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):793-799. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.衰老如何影响结直肠腹腔镜手术后的抢救失败。对一个高容量单一中心的1000例患者进行分析。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02173-6.
2
Failure to Rescue After Resection of Perhilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an International Multicenter Cohort.国际多中心队列研究中肝门部胆管癌切除术后的未挽救情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1762-1768. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16293-7. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
6,126 hepatectomies in 2022: current trend of outcome in Italy.
2022 年 6126 例肝切除术:意大利目前的结局趋势。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 10;409(1):211. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03398-6.
4
Predictive factors of 90-day mortality after curative hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a western single-center observational study.根治性肝切除术后 90 天死亡率的预测因素:一项西方单中心观察性研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 May 3;409(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03337-5.
5
Outcomes of elective liver surgery worldwide: a global, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study.全球择期肝外科手术结局:一项全球性、前瞻性、多中心、横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3954-3966. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000711.
6
Perioperative predictive factors of failure to rescue following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study.高难度肝胆胰手术后抢救失败的围手术期预测因素:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov 24;21(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03257-6.
7
The failure to rescue factor: aftermath analyses on 224 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.未挽救因素:对224例肝门周围胆管癌的事后分析
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1919-1939. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01589-2. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
8
Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality in hepato-biliary surgery in Veneto region, Italy.意大利威尼托地区肝胆外科手术的医院容量和手术死亡率趋势。
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1949-1959. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01574-9. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
9
A novel comprehensive ALPPS preoperative risk assessment (CAPRA) score is beneficial in creating a treatment strategy for advanced liver malignancy.一种新型的综合ALPPS术前风险评估(CAPRA)评分有助于为晚期肝脏恶性肿瘤制定治疗策略。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Apr 10;12(2):287-290. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-121. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry.意大利 ALPPS 微创手术技术的演变和手术结果:10 年来国家前瞻性登记处的全面趋势分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5285-5294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4. Epub 2023 Mar 28.