Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK); Partner Site: Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;323:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.102. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Catheter ablation is recommended for symptomatic WPW-syndrome. Commonly perceived low recurrence rates were challenged recently. We sought to identify patient strata at increased risk.
Of 12,566 patients enrolled at 52 German Ablation Registry sites from 2007 to 2010, 789 were treated for WPW-syndrome. Patients were included for symptomatic palpitations and tachycardia documentation. Follow-up duration was one year. Overall complications were defined as serious, access-related, and ablation-related. We adjudicated WPW-recurrence for re-ablation during follow-up. Risk strata included: admission for repeat ablation at registry entry; accessory pathway localization; antiarrhythmic medical treatment before the ablation.
WPW-syndrome patients were 42.8 ± 16.2 years on average; 39.9% were women. A majority of 95.9% was symptomatic; in 84.4%, a tachycardia was documented. Seventy-six (9.6%) patients presented for repeat procedures. Accessory pathways were located in the left atrium (71.4%), right atrium (21.1%), septum (4.4%), or coronary sinus diverticula (2.1%). Prior antiarrhythmic medication was used in 43.7% of patients. No serious events occurred. The overall complication rate was 2.5% (ablation related 1.2%, access-related 1.3%). Major determinants for complications were presentation for re-ablation as registry index procedure (6.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.016) and septal pathway location (left 2.0% vs septal 9.1%, p = 0.014). The overall re-ablation rate was 9.7%. Usage of prior antiarrhythmic medication was associated with higher recurrence rates (12.2% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.035).
Patients at higher complication risk may be identified by repeat procedure and septal pathway location. Prior antiarrhythmic medication was associated with higher recurrence rates. Our findings may help improving peri-procedural patient management and information.
导管消融术推荐用于有症状的 WPW 综合征患者。最近,人们对其公认的低复发率提出了质疑。我们试图确定复发风险较高的患者群体。
在 2007 年至 2010 年间,52 个德国消融登记处的 12566 名患者中,有 789 名患者因 WPW 综合征接受治疗。这些患者均有症状性心悸和心动过速的记录。随访时间为一年。总体并发症定义为严重、与通路相关和消融相关的并发症。我们对随访期间再次消融的 WPW 复发进行了裁决。风险分层包括:登记处登记时因重复消融而入院;旁路定位;消融前抗心律失常药物治疗。
WPW 综合征患者的平均年龄为 42.8±16.2 岁;39.9%为女性。大多数患者(95.9%)有症状;84.4%的患者有心动过速记录。76 名(9.6%)患者因重复治疗而就诊。旁路位于左心房(71.4%)、右心房(21.1%)、间隔(4.4%)或冠状窦憩室(2.1%)。43.7%的患者使用过抗心律失常药物。未发生严重事件。总的并发症发生率为 2.5%(消融相关 1.2%,通路相关 1.3%)。严重并发症的主要决定因素是登记处索引程序时再次消融的表现(6.9% vs 2.2%;p=0.016)和间隔旁路位置(左心房 2.0% vs 间隔 9.1%,p=0.014)。总的再次消融率为 9.7%。使用抗心律失常药物与较高的复发率相关(12.2% vs 7.6%;p=0.035)。
通过再次治疗和间隔旁路位置,可以识别出并发症风险较高的患者。抗心律失常药物的使用与较高的复发率相关。我们的发现可能有助于改善围手术期患者管理和信息。