Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; iPSYCH The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Denmark.
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Nov;90:364-380. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Antipsychotic effects of immunomodulating drugs have been suggested; however, a thorough, comprehensive meta-analysis on the effect and safety of anti-inflammatory add-on treatment on psychotic disorders is lacking.
Multiple databases were searched up until February 2020. Only double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes were change in total psychopathology and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included, amongst others, positive and negative symptoms, general psychopathology and cognitive domains. We performed random-effects meta-analyses estimating mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for effect sizes.
Seventy RCTs (N = 4104) were included, investigating either primarily anti-inflammatory drugs, i.e. drugs developed for immunomodulation, such as NSAIDs, minocycline and monoclonal antibodies (k = 15), or drugs with potential anti-inflammatory properties (k = 55), e.g. neurosteroids, N-acetyl cysteine, estrogens, fatty acids, statins, and glitazones. Antipsychotics plus anti-inflammatory treatment, compared to antipsychotics plus placebo, was associated with a PANSS scale MD improvement of -4.57 (95%CI = -5.93 to -3.20) points, corresponding to a SMD effect size of -0.29 (95%CI = -0.40 to -0.19). Trials on schizophrenia (MD = -6.80; 95%CI, -9.08 to -4.52) showed greater improvement (p < 0.01) than trials also including other psychotic disorders. However, primarily anti-inflammatory drugs (MD = 4.00; 95%CI = -7.19 to -0.80) were not superior (p = 0.69) to potential anti-inflammatory drugs (MD = 4.71; 95%CI = -6.26 to -3.17). Furthermore, meta-regression found that smaller studies showed significantly larger effect sizes than the larger studies (p = 0.0085), and only 2 studies had low risk of bias on all domains. Small but significant effects were found on negative symptoms (MD = -1.29), positive symptoms (MD = -0.53), general psychopathology (MD = -1.50) and working memory (SMD = 0.21). No differences were found regarding adverse events, but only 26 studies reported hereon.
Anti-inflammatory add-on treatment to antipsychotics showed improvement of psychotic disorders; however, no superiority was found in primarily anti-inflammatory drugs, raising the question of the mechanism behind the effect, and treatment effect might be overestimated due to the large number of small studies.
免疫调节药物具有抗精神病作用;然而,缺乏关于抗炎附加治疗对精神病的疗效和安全性的全面综合荟萃分析。
我们对截至 2020 年 2 月的多个数据库进行了检索。仅纳入了双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验(RCT)。主要结局是总精神病学变化和不良事件。次要结局包括阳性和阴性症状、一般精神病学和认知领域等。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,估计了效应大小的均数差(MD)和标准化均数差(SMD)。
共纳入了 70 项 RCT(N=4104),分别研究了主要的抗炎药物,即开发用于免疫调节的药物,如非甾体抗炎药、米诺环素和单克隆抗体(k=15),或具有潜在抗炎特性的药物(k=55),如神经甾体、N-乙酰半胱氨酸、雌激素、脂肪酸、他汀类药物和噻唑烷二酮类药物。与抗精神病药加安慰剂相比,抗精神病药加抗炎治疗与 PANSS 量表 MD 改善 -4.57(95%CI=-5.93 至-3.20)点相关,对应的 SMD 效应大小为-0.29(95%CI=-0.40 至-0.19)。仅针对精神分裂症的试验(MD=-6.80;95%CI,-9.08 至-4.52)显示出更大的改善(p<0.01),而也包括其他精神病的试验则没有(p=0.48)。然而,主要的抗炎药物(MD=4.00;95%CI=7.19 至-0.80)并不优于潜在的抗炎药物(MD=4.71;95%CI=6.26 至-3.17)(p=0.69)。此外,元回归发现,较小的研究显示出比较大的研究更大的效应大小(p=0.0085),只有 2 项研究在所有领域的偏倚风险较低。在阴性症状(MD=-1.29)、阳性症状(MD=-0.53)、一般精神病学(MD=-1.50)和工作记忆(SMD=0.21)方面发现了较小但有统计学意义的改善。在不良事件方面没有发现差异,但这里仅报告了 26 项研究。
抗精神病药加抗炎治疗可改善精神病;然而,主要的抗炎药物并没有显示出优越性,这引发了对作用机制的质疑,并且由于大量的小型研究,治疗效果可能被高估了。