Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:270-275. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
Few patients affected by gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) are offered locoregional treatment, despite several proof-of-efficacy trials. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has emerged in recent years as a promising tool to control peritoneal carcinomatosis. The combination of PIPAC with systemic chemotherapy may offer a greater clinical benefit than standard treatment alone.
A single-center cohort of 28 consecutive patients affected by GCPM was scheduled for bidirectional treatment, comprising PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy, from September 2017 to September 2019. Data recorded included safety, efficacy and survival outcomes. Ascite volumes, the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and pathological response through the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) were compared in those patients who underwent more than one PIPAC procedure.
Forty-six PIPAC procedures were administered, with a mean of 1.7 PIPAC procedures per patient. The median time to resume systemic chemotherapy after PIPAC was 6 days (range 4-7). Concerning safety, two grade 3-4 CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) toxicity events and one intraoperative complication were recorded. Thirteen patients repeated PIPAC. A pathological response was recorded in 61.5% of patients (one with complete and seven with partial regression). The median overall survival was 12.3 months in the overall population and 15.0 months in patients undergoing more than one PIPAC procedure.
A bidirectional approach for GCPM was feasible and safe, as the PIPAC procedure integrates well with several systemic chemotherapy regimens. The pathological response demonstrated the antitumoral efficacy of PIPAC. The proposed bidirectional approach may be further investigated in the first-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.
尽管有多项疗效验证试验,但仅有少数患有胃癌腹膜转移(GCPM)的患者接受局部区域治疗。近年来,加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)作为一种控制腹膜癌病的有前途的工具出现。PIPAC 与全身化疗联合使用可能比单独标准治疗提供更大的临床获益。
2017 年 9 月至 2019 年 9 月,我们对 28 例连续患有 GCPM 的患者进行了一项单中心队列研究,计划对其进行双向治疗,包括 PIPAC 和全身化疗。记录的数据包括安全性、疗效和生存结果。比较了接受多次 PIPAC 治疗的患者的腹水体积、腹膜癌指数(PCI)和通过腹膜消退分级评分(PRGS)的病理反应。
共进行了 46 次 PIPAC 手术,每位患者的平均 PIPAC 手术次数为 1.7 次。PIPAC 后恢复全身化疗的中位时间为 6 天(范围 4-7 天)。关于安全性,记录了 2 例 3-4 级 CTCAE(不良事件通用术语标准 4.0 版)毒性事件和 1 例术中并发症。13 例患者重复了 PIPAC。61.5%的患者(1 例完全缓解,7 例部分缓解)记录了病理反应。总人群的中位总生存期为 12.3 个月,接受多次 PIPAC 治疗的患者为 15.0 个月。
GCPM 的双向治疗是可行且安全的,因为 PIPAC 手术与几种全身化疗方案结合良好。病理反应显示了 PIPAC 的抗肿瘤疗效。这种拟议的双向方法可能会在转移性胃癌的一线治疗中进一步研究。