Suppr超能文献

什么是 Thy3a?一项对 336 例 Thy3a(AUS/FLUS)甲状腺细针抽吸活检(FNAs)的研究将英国皇家病理学院(RCPath)与其他报告系统进行了比较,表明 Thy3a 亚分类如何能够改善风险分层,并有助于解决该类别过度使用的问题。

What is Thy3a? A study of 336 Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) thyroid FNAs with histology compares UK RCPath with other reporting systems and shows how Thy3a subclassification can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of this category.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2021 Jan;32(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12910. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) is an indeterminate and heterogeneous category in thyroid cytology. Thy3a reporting rates vary widely, with many laboratories documenting overuse. Subclassification of Thy3a helps with risk stratification. We aimed to investigate whether subclassification can also help address Thy3a overuse. We compare the UK reporting system with other terminologies.

METHODS

An audit of thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) reported at our institution between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Thy3a FNAs followed by histology were reviewed and subcategorised into four subgroups: Scanty Atypia (SA), Scanty Microfollicular (SMF), Favour Benign (FB) and Thyroiditis versus Neoplasm (TVN). Review and subclassification were blinded to histology outcomes. FNAs were correlated with histology and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Our Thy3a rate was high (24% of all thyroid FNAs). For 336 Thy3a FNAs with histology, the malignancy rates of the four subgroups were: SA 68%, SMF 20%, FB 4%, TVN 31%. There were significant associations between subgroup and malignancy risk, and between subgroup and tumour risk. On histology, SA had more malignancies than expected and FB had fewer. SA and SMF had more tumours than expected and FB had fewer. SMF and Thy3f FNAs were similar in terms of tumour and malignancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclassification of Thy3a FNAs into these four subgroups is recommended. This can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of Thy3a. We propose that some FB and SMF cases could be safely diverted to Thy2 and Thy3f respectively. We compare various reporting terminologies and question how indeterminate FNAs should be classified.

摘要

简介

Thy3a(AUS/FLUS)是甲状腺细胞学中的一个不确定和异质性类别。Thy3a 的报告率差异很大,许多实验室都记录了过度使用。Thy3a 的细分有助于风险分层。我们旨在研究细分是否也有助于解决 Thy3a 的过度使用问题。我们比较了英国的报告系统和其他术语。

方法

对我们机构 2012 年至 2017 年期间报告的甲状腺细针抽吸(FNA)进行了审计。审查了随后进行组织学检查的 Thy3a FNA,并将其细分为四个亚组:稀少不典型(SA)、稀少微滤泡(SMF)、倾向良性(FB)和甲状腺炎与肿瘤(TVN)。审查和细分对组织学结果是盲目的。对 FNA 与组织学进行了相关性分析,并进行了统计学分析。

结果

我们的 Thy3a 率很高(所有甲状腺 FNA 的 24%)。对于 336 例有组织学检查的 Thy3a FNA,四个亚组的恶性肿瘤率分别为:SA 68%、SMF 20%、FB 4%、TVN 31%。亚组与恶性肿瘤风险之间以及亚组与肿瘤风险之间存在显著关联。在组织学上,SA 的恶性肿瘤比预期的多,而 FB 的恶性肿瘤比预期的少。SA 和 SMF 的肿瘤比预期的多,而 FB 的肿瘤比预期的少。SMF 和 Thy3f FNA 在肿瘤和恶性肿瘤结果方面相似。

结论

建议将 Thy3a FNA 细分为这四个亚组。这可以改善风险分层并有助于解决 Thy3a 的过度使用问题。我们建议可以将一些 FB 和 SMF 病例分别安全地分流到 Thy2 和 Thy3f。我们比较了各种报告术语,并质疑不确定的 FNA 应该如何分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验