Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an 710061, China.
Medical Records Department, the First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin 718000, China.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020 Sep;21(9):756. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B18r0122.
Retraction Note to: J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2019 20(3):238-252. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800122. The authors have retracted this article (Guo et al., 2019) because some data from the original literature had not been converted to appropriate units in the paper, which resulted in deviation of the meta-analysis results. For example, for the forest plot used to examine associations between PM exposure and the risk of adverse birth outcomes, the estimates from Brauer et al. (2008), Pedersen et al. (2013), Zhao et al. (2015), and Hansen et al. (2006) were on the originally reported scales of 1 µg/m, 10 µg/m, 10 µg/m, and Inter Quartile Range, respectively. None of these estimates had been converted to 20 µg/m increase scale that was stated in the article. Similar problem exists in the analysis on associations between NO exposure and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis are misleading. All authors have agreed to this retraction and express their deepest apologies to the original authors, publishers, and readers.
浙江大学生物科学与生物技术学报 2019 年 20 卷(3):238-252。https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800122. 作者撤回了这篇文章(Guo 等人,2019),因为原文文献中的一些数据在论文中没有转换为适当的单位,这导致了荟萃分析结果的偏差。例如,对于用来检验 PM 暴露与不良出生结局风险之间关联的森林图,Brauer 等人(2008 年)、Pedersen 等人(2013 年)、Zhao 等人(2015 年)和 Hansen 等人(2006 年)的估计值分别基于最初报告的 1µg/m、10µg/m、10µg/m 和四分位间距的尺度。这些估计值均未转换为文章中提到的 20µg/m 增加尺度。在分析 NO 暴露与不良出生结局风险之间的关联时也存在类似的问题。因此,荟萃分析的结果具有误导性。所有作者都同意撤稿,并对原作者、出版商和读者表示最深切的歉意。