• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过元数据框架增强临床研究数据的可追溯性。

Enhancing Traceability in Clinical Research Data through a Metadata Framework.

机构信息

Department of Data Science, CDISC, State College, Pennsylvania, United States.

Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, California State University East Bay, Hayward, California, United States.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2020 May;59(2-03):75-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714393. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1714393
PMID:32894879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical research data lifecycle, from data collection to analysis results, functions in silos that restrict traceability. Traceability is a requirement for regulated clinical research studies and an important attribute of nonregulated studies. Current clinical research software tools provide limited metadata traceability capabilities and are unable to query variables across all phases of the data lifecycle.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a metadata traceability framework that can help query and visualize traceability metadata, identify traceability gaps, and validate metadata traceability to improve data lineage and reproducibility within clinical research studies.

METHODS

This research follows the design science research paradigm where the objective is to create and evaluate an information technology (IT) artifact that explicitly addresses an organizational problem or opportunity. The implementation and evaluation of the IT artifact demonstrate the feasibility of both the design process and the final designed product.

RESULTS

We present Trace-XML, a metadata traceability framework that extends standard clinical research metadata models and adapts graph traversal algorithms to provide clinical research study traceability queries, validation, and visualization. Trace-XML was evaluated using analytical and qualitative methods. The analytical methods show that Trace-XML accurately and completely assesses metadata traceability within a clinical research study. A qualitative study used thematic analysis of interview data to show that Trace-XML adds utility to a researcher's ability to evaluate metadata traceability within a study.

CONCLUSION

Trace-XML benefits include features that (1) identify traceability gaps in clinical study metadata, (2) validate metadata traceability within a clinical study, and (3) query and visualize traceability metadata. The key themes that emerged from the qualitative evaluation affirm that Trace-XML adds utility to the task of creating and assessing end-to-end clinical research study traceability.

摘要

背景

临床研究数据的生命周期,从数据收集到分析结果,各个功能模块之间相互隔离,限制了可追溯性。可追溯性是受监管的临床研究的要求,也是不受监管的研究的重要属性。当前的临床研究软件工具提供有限的元数据可追溯性功能,并且无法跨数据生命周期的所有阶段查询变量。

目的

开发一个元数据可追溯性框架,帮助查询和可视化可追溯性元数据,识别可追溯性差距,并验证元数据可追溯性,以提高临床研究中的数据沿袭和可重复性。

方法

本研究遵循设计科学研究范式,其目标是创建和评估明确解决组织问题或机会的信息技术 (IT) 工件。IT 工件的实施和评估展示了设计过程和最终设计产品的可行性。

结果

我们提出了 Trace-XML,这是一个元数据可追溯性框架,它扩展了标准的临床研究元数据模型,并采用图遍历算法提供临床研究的可追溯性查询、验证和可视化。Trace-XML 使用分析和定性方法进行了评估。分析方法表明,Trace-XML 可以准确、完整地评估临床研究中元数据的可追溯性。定性研究通过对访谈数据的主题分析表明,Trace-XML 增加了研究人员评估研究中元数据可追溯性的能力。

结论

Trace-XML 的优点包括:(1) 识别临床研究元数据中的可追溯性差距;(2) 验证临床研究中的元数据可追溯性;(3) 查询和可视化可追溯性元数据。定性评估中出现的关键主题肯定了 Trace-XML 在创建和评估端到端临床研究可追溯性方面增加了实用性。

相似文献

1
Enhancing Traceability in Clinical Research Data through a Metadata Framework.通过元数据框架增强临床研究数据的可追溯性。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 May;59(2-03):75-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714393. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
2
Visualizing and Validating Metadata Traceability within the CDISC Standards.可视化与验证CDISC标准中的元数据可追溯性
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2017 Jul 26;2017:158-165. eCollection 2017.
3
Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions.通过在不同研究软件解决方案之间交换CDISC元数据,扩大临床研究中的合作。
Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(4):441-6.
4
ProvCaRe: Characterizing scientific reproducibility of biomedical research studies using semantic provenance metadata.ProvCaRe:使用语义来源元数据刻画生物医学研究的科学可重复性。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jan;121:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
5
Semantic Provenance Graph for Reproducibility of Biomedical Research Studies: Generating and Analyzing Graph Structures from Published Literature.用于生物医学研究可重复性的语义溯源图:从已发表文献中生成和分析图结构。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:328-332. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190237.
6
Towards Data Value-Level Metadata for Clinical Studies.面向临床研究的数据价值级元数据
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:418-423.
7
From Planning Stage Towards FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists.从规划阶段到 FAIR 数据:生物医学科学家实用元数据表。
Sci Data. 2024 May 22;11(1):524. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03349-2.
8
Development of an open metadata schema for prospective clinical research (openPCR) in China.中国前瞻性临床研究开放元数据模式(openPCR)的开发。
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(1):39-46. doi: 10.3414/ME13-01-0008. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Ontological Modelling and Execution of Phenotypic Queries in the Leipzig Health Atlas.莱比锡健康图谱中的本体建模和表型查询执行。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 24;278:66-74. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210052.
10
Metadata Import from RDF to i2b2.从资源描述框架(RDF)到整合生物学信息库(i2b2)的元数据导入。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;253:40-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Provenance Information for Biomedical Data and Workflows: Scoping Review.生物医学数据和工作流程的出处信息:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e51297. doi: 10.2196/51297.
2
The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study.德国医学数据集成中心的数据管理实践现状:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 8;25:e48809. doi: 10.2196/48809.
3
Data Provenance in Biomedical Research: Scoping Review.生物医学研究中的数据溯源:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 27;25:e42289. doi: 10.2196/42289.
4
Standardized Integration of Person-Generated Data Into Routine Clinical Care.将患者生成的数据标准化整合到常规临床护理中。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Feb 10;10(2):e31048. doi: 10.2196/31048.
5
Approaches and Criteria for Provenance in Biomedical Data Sets and Workflows: Protocol for a Scoping Review.生物医学数据集和工作流程中出处的方法与标准:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 22;10(11):e31750. doi: 10.2196/31750.
6
Statistical Enrichment Analysis of Samples: A General-Purpose Tool to Annotate Metadata Neighborhoods of Biological Samples.样本的统计富集分析:一种用于注释生物样本元数据邻域的通用工具。
Front Big Data. 2021 Sep 16;4:725276. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.725276. eCollection 2021.