Thomas Deborah S K, Jang Sojin, Scandlyn Jean
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Department of Political Science & Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, NC, 28372, USA.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020 Dec;51:101828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101828. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Complex environmental, economic, and social conditions in the places we live provide strong cues to our longevity, livelihood, and well-being. Although often distinct and evolving relatively independently, health disparity, social vulnerability and environmental justice research and practice intertwine and inform one another. Together, they increasingly provide evidence of how social processes intensify disasters almost predictably giving rise to inequitable disruptions and consequences. The domino and cumulative effects of cascading disasters invariably reveal inequities through differential impacts and recovery opportunities across communities and subgroups of people. Not only do cascading disasters reveal and produce inequitable effects, the cascade itself can emerge out of compounded nested social structures. Drawing on, and integrating, theory and practice from social vulnerability, health inequity, and environmental justice, this paper presents a comprehensive conceptual model of cascading disasters that offers a people-centric lens. The CHASMS conceptual model (ascading azards to dissters that are ocially constructed eerging out of ocial Vulnerability) interrogates the tension between local communities and the larger structural forces that produce social inequities at multiple levels, capturing how those inequities lead to cascading disasters. We apply the model to COVID-19 as an illustration of how underlying inequities give rise to foreseeable inequitable outcomes, emphasizing the U.S. experience. We offer Kenya and Puerto Rico as examples of cumulative effects and possible cascades when responding to other events in the shadow of COVID-19. COVID-19 has vividly exposed the dynamic, complex, and intense relevance of placing social conditions and structures at the forefront of cascading disaster inquiry and practice. The intensity of social disruption and the continuation of the pandemic will, no doubt, perpetuate and magnify chasms of injustice.
我们生活的地方复杂的环境、经济和社会状况为我们的寿命、生计和福祉提供了强烈线索。虽然健康差距、社会脆弱性以及环境正义的研究与实践通常各自不同且相对独立地发展,但它们相互交织并相互影响。它们越来越多地提供证据,表明社会进程如何几乎可预测地加剧灾难,从而导致不公平的破坏和后果。级联灾害的多米诺效应和累积效应总是通过对不同社区和人群亚组的不同影响以及恢复机会揭示不平等。级联灾害不仅揭示并产生不公平的影响,其级联本身可能源于复杂的嵌套社会结构。本文借鉴并整合社会脆弱性、健康不平等和环境正义的理论与实践,提出了一个以人为主的级联灾害综合概念模型。CHASMS概念模型(从社会脆弱性中产生的社会建构的灾害级联)审视了当地社区与在多个层面产生社会不平等的更大结构力量之间的紧张关系,捕捉这些不平等如何导致级联灾害。我们将该模型应用于新冠疫情,以说明潜在的不平等如何导致可预见的不公平结果,并重点强调美国的情况。我们以肯尼亚和波多黎各为例来说明在新冠疫情阴影下应对其他事件时的累积效应和可能的级联效应。新冠疫情生动地揭示了将社会状况和结构置于级联灾害调查与实践前沿的动态、复杂和强烈的相关性。社会破坏的强度以及疫情的持续无疑将使不公正的鸿沟长期存在并扩大。