Suppr超能文献

去角会影响到为群体饲养的奶牛犊提供的庇护所的使用。

Disbudding affects use of a shelter provided to group-housed dairy calves.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.

Institut national supérieur des sciences agronomiques de l'alimentation et de l'environnement, AgroSup Dijon, Dijon Cedex, 21079, France.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2020 Nov;103(11):10519-10529. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18267. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

Disbudding in dairy calves is well established as a painful procedure with broad effects on behavior. The hypothesis of this experiment was that group-housed calves subjected to hot-iron disbudding would exhibit social withdrawal, based on use of a shelter providing physical and visual seclusion from the rest of the pen. We examined effects of hot-iron disbudding on use of this shelter, including individual and shared use, and resting behavior within the shelter. Holstein heifer and bull calves (n = 24) were housed in group pens (4 calves/pen; 3.7 × 8.0 m). Each pen contained a 3-sided open-top shelter (1.2 m square, and 1.2 m high) with an additional half-enclosed wall to allow entry, built out of corrugated plastic. Calves were randomly assigned within pen to be disbudded (n = 12; 10 bulls and 2 heifers; 36.2 ± 3.9 d of age) or receive sham handling only (n = 12; 9 bulls and 3 heifers; 36.3 ± 4.2 d of age). Disbudded calves received a local cornual nerve block and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication before the procedure. Behavior was recorded continuously from video for 3 consecutive days, beginning immediately following the disbudding procedure or handling. Shelter use was highly variable between calves (ranging from 10.8 min/d to 20.7 h/d), but calves showed individual consistency in their use of the shelter over time. Disbudded calves spent more time in the shelter (4.6 vs. 1.6 h/d; disbudded vs. sham). Social use of the shelter as a percentage of shelter use was not affected by disbudding, but disbudded calves spent more time in the shelter together (31 vs. 9% of shelter use; disbudded vs. sham). Disbudded calves entered the shelter more frequently when it was unoccupied (8.1 vs. 5.5 entries; disbudded vs. sham) and similarly left it more frequently when it was occupied. Disbudded calves used the shelter more during daylight hours (0700 to 2000 h; 8.9 vs. 4.1 min/h) on each day, including d 0 when pain mitigation was effective, whereas use did not differ during the night. Disbudded calves spent approximately 40 min less time lying/d and spent a greater percentage of their lying time inside the shelter. These results suggest that disbudded calves make greater use of environmental features that offer seclusion, with use of the shelter possibly reflecting an increased preference for social withdrawal or for some other aspect of this area of visual and physical separation. Further, these results suggest that disbudding even with recommended pain mitigation affects behavior for at least several days.

摘要

给奶牛犊牛去角是一种公认的痛苦过程,对其行为有广泛影响。本实验的假设是,接受热铁去角的群体饲养犊牛会表现出社会回避,这是基于使用提供身体和视觉隔离的遮蔽物来实现的,使其与畜栏的其余部分隔离。我们研究了热铁去角对这种遮蔽物的使用的影响,包括个体和共享使用,以及在遮蔽物内的休息行为。荷斯坦小母牛和公牛犊牛(n = 24)被安置在群体畜栏中(每栏 4 头犊牛;3.7 × 8.0 m)。每个畜栏都有一个三面开放式的顶部遮蔽物(1.2 平方米,高 1.2 米),还有一个额外的半封闭墙壁允许进入,用波纹塑料建造。犊牛在畜栏内随机分配进行去角(n = 12;10 头公牛和 2 头小母牛;36.2 ± 3.9 日龄)或仅接受假处理(n = 12;9 头公牛和 3 头小母牛;36.3 ± 4.2 日龄)。去角的犊牛在手术前接受局部角神经阻滞和非甾体抗炎药。从视频中连续记录 3 天的行为,从去角手术或处理后立即开始。遮蔽物的使用在犊牛之间差异很大(10.8 分钟/天至 20.7 小时/天),但随着时间的推移,犊牛在使用遮蔽物方面表现出个体一致性。去角的犊牛在遮蔽物中的时间更多(4.6 比 1.6 小时/天;去角与假处理)。作为遮蔽物使用的一部分,社会使用遮蔽物不受去角的影响,但去角的犊牛在一起在遮蔽物中花费的时间更多(31 比 9%的遮蔽物使用;去角与假处理)。当遮蔽物无人占用时,去角的犊牛更频繁地进入(8.1 比 5.5 次进入;去角与假处理),而当遮蔽物被占用时,它们也更频繁地离开。去角的犊牛在白天(0700 至 2000 小时)的每个白天,包括疼痛缓解有效的 d0,在遮蔽物中的使用时间更多(8.9 比 4.1 分钟/小时),而在夜间则没有差异。去角的犊牛躺着的时间减少了大约 40 分钟,并且在遮蔽物内躺着的时间比例更大。这些结果表明,去角的犊牛更多地使用提供隔离的环境特征,对遮蔽物的使用可能反映出对社会回避的更大偏好,或者对该视觉和物理隔离区域的其他方面的偏好。此外,这些结果表明,即使使用了推荐的止痛措施,去角也会至少在几天内影响行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验