School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (Mr Büttner and Drs Doherty, Blake, and Delahunt); Sports Medicine Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora (Dr Howell); Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Dr Howell); The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, Massachusetts (Dr Howell); Emergency Department, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland (Dr Ryan); and Institute for Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (Dr Delahunt).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(2):87-95. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000608.
To (1) quantify the diagnostic accuracy of the vestibular/oculomotor screening (VOMS), and (2) determine the recovery of vestibular and oculomotor impairments exhibited by concussed athletes compared with nonconcussed athletes using the VOMS.
Clinical assessment laboratory.
Amateur athletes who were diagnosed with sport-related concussion by emergency department physicians, and non-concussed, control athletes.
Prospective, longitudinal study.
Participants were assessed 1 week following sport-related concussion, upon clearance to return-to-sporting activity, and 2 weeks following return-to-sporting activity by a study investigator who administered the VOMS. We calculated test sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the VOMS. We performed a mixed-design analysis of variance to assess differences in VOMS symptom scores reported by concussed athletes compared with control athletes.
Fifty concussion participants and 50 control participants completed the study. The VOMS demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 46%, respectively, and produced positive and negative predictive values of 64% and 92%, respectively. The concussion group exhibited a significantly greater symptom provocation change score from baseline than the control group for all test domains of the VOMS only in the first week following concussion.
The VOMS may be most useful as a clinical screening tool to rule out, rather than confirm, the presence of sport-related concussion. The VOMS may be appropriate to inform the recovery of vestibular and oculomotor impairments exhibited by concussed individuals over time.
(1) 量化前庭/眼动筛查(VOMS)的诊断准确性,(2) 确定与非脑震荡运动员相比,脑震荡运动员使用 VOMS 表现出的前庭和眼动功能障碍的恢复情况。
临床评估实验室。
被急诊医生诊断为与运动相关的脑震荡的业余运动员,以及非脑震荡的对照运动员。
前瞻性、纵向研究。
参与者在运动相关脑震荡后 1 周、清除重返运动活动的限制后以及重返运动活动后 2 周,由一位研究调查员进行评估,该调查员进行了 VOMS 测试。我们计算了测试的敏感性、特异性和阳性及阴性预测值,以评估 VOMS 的诊断准确性。我们进行了混合设计方差分析,以评估脑震荡运动员与对照组运动员报告的 VOMS 症状评分之间的差异。
50 名脑震荡参与者和 50 名对照组参与者完成了研究。VOMS 的敏感性和特异性分别为 96%和 46%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 64%和 92%。仅在脑震荡后的第一周,与对照组相比,脑震荡组在 VOMS 的所有测试域中表现出更大的症状诱发变化评分。
VOMS 可能最适合作为一种临床筛查工具,用于排除而不是确认与运动相关的脑震荡的存在。VOMS 可能适合用于随着时间的推移告知脑震荡患者表现出的前庭和眼动功能障碍的恢复情况。