• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LEAP 计划:通过实施科学研究发现来解决团队准备差距的质量改进培训。

The LEAP Program: Quality Improvement Training to Address Team Readiness Gaps Identified by Implementation Science Findings.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):288-295. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06133-1. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06133-1
PMID:32901440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7878618/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrating evidence-based innovations (EBIs) into sustained use is challenging; most implementations in health systems fail. Increasing frontline teams' quality improvement (QI) capability may increase the implementation readiness and success of EBI implementation.

OBJECTIVES

Develop a QI training program ("Learn. Engage. Act. Process." (LEAP)) and evaluate its impact on frontline obesity treatment teams to improve treatment delivered within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

DESIGN

This was a pre-post evaluation of the LEAP program. MOVE! coordinators (N = 68) were invited to participate in LEAP; 24 were randomly assigned to four starting times. MOVE! coordinators formed teams to work on improvement aims. Pre-post surveys assessed team organizational readiness for implementing change and self-rated QI skills. Program satisfaction, assignment completion, and aim achievement were also evaluated.

PARTICIPANTS

VHA facility-based MOVE! teams.

INTERVENTIONS

LEAP is a 21-week QI training program. Core components include audit and feedback reports, structured curriculum, coaching and learning community, and online platform.

MAIN MEASURES

Organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC); self-rated QI skills before and after LEAP; assignment completion and aim achievement; program satisfaction.

KEY RESULTS

Seventeen of 24 randomized teams participated in LEAP. Participants' self-ratings across six categories of QI skills increased after completing LEAP (p< 0.0001). The ORIC measure showed no statistically significant change overall; the change efficacy subscale marginally improved (p < 0.08), and the change commitment subscale remained the same (p = 0.66). Depending on the assignment, 35 to 100% of teams completed the assignment. Nine teams achieved their aim. Most team members were satisfied or very satisfied (81-89%) with the LEAP components, 74% intended to continue using QI methods, and 81% planned to continue improvement work.

CONCLUSIONS

LEAP is scalable and does not require travel or time away from clinical responsibilities. While QI skills improved among participating teams and most completed the work, they struggled to do so amid competing clinical priorities.

摘要

背景

将循证创新(EBI)融入持续使用具有挑战性;大多数卫生系统的实施都以失败告终。提高一线团队的质量改进(QI)能力可能会提高 EBI 实施的实施准备度和成功率。

目的

开发一个 QI 培训计划(“学习。参与。行动。处理。”(LEAP)),并评估其对退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内前线肥胖治疗团队的影响,以改善治疗效果。

设计

这是 LEAP 计划的预-后评估。MOVE!协调员(N = 68)受邀参加 LEAP;24 人被随机分配到四个起始时间。MOVE!协调员组成团队以实现改进目标。预-后调查评估了团队实施变革的组织准备情况和自我评估的质量改进技能。还评估了计划满意度、任务完成情况和目标实现情况。

参与者

VHA 基于设施的 MOVE!团队。

干预措施

LEAP 是一个 21 周的 QI 培训计划。核心组件包括审计和反馈报告、结构化课程、辅导和学习社区以及在线平台。

主要措施

实施变革的组织准备就绪(ORIC);LEAP 前后自我评估的 QI 技能;任务完成情况和目标实现情况;计划满意度。

主要结果

24 个随机团队中的 17 个参加了 LEAP。参与者在完成 LEAP 后,在六个类别的 QI 技能方面的自我评分均有所提高(p<0.0001)。ORIC 测量值总体上没有统计学意义上的变化;变化效能子量表略有改善(p < 0.08),而变化承诺子量表保持不变(p = 0.66)。根据任务的不同,35%至 100%的团队完成了任务。九个团队实现了目标。大多数团队成员对 LEAP 组件非常满意或满意(81%-89%),74%的人打算继续使用 QI 方法,81%的人计划继续改进工作。

结论

LEAP 具有可扩展性,不需要旅行或离开临床职责。虽然参与团队的 QI 技能有所提高,并且大多数团队都完成了工作,但他们在应对竞争激烈的临床优先事项时仍难以完成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/517b/7878618/d1d6e1a0c91e/11606_2020_6133_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/517b/7878618/4d55fa647cb5/11606_2020_6133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/517b/7878618/d1d6e1a0c91e/11606_2020_6133_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/517b/7878618/4d55fa647cb5/11606_2020_6133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/517b/7878618/d1d6e1a0c91e/11606_2020_6133_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The LEAP Program: Quality Improvement Training to Address Team Readiness Gaps Identified by Implementation Science Findings.LEAP 计划:通过实施科学研究发现来解决团队准备差距的质量改进培训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):288-295. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06133-1. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.虚拟质量改进培训计划对提高大型卫生系统内体重管理计划覆盖范围的效果。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14344. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14344. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.一线的持续质量改进:一个跨学科临床团队在完成虚拟学习项目后的四年历程。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 27;6(4):e10345. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10345. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration.评估基于证据的质量改进的保真度,作为退伍军人健康管理局患者为中心的医疗之家转型的实施策略。
Implement Sci. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0979-y.
5
Acceptability of a complex team-based quality improvement intervention for transient ischemic attack: a mixed-methods study.接受基于复杂团队的短暂性脑缺血发作质量改进干预的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06318-2.
6
The role of psychological safety and learning behavior in the development of effective quality improvement teams in Ghana: an observational study.心理安全和学习行为在加纳有效质量改进团队发展中的作用:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4234-7.
7
Empowering Implementation Teams with a Learning Health System Approach: Leveraging Data to Improve Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack.采用学习型健康系统方法增强实施团队能力:利用数据提高短暂性脑缺血发作的护理质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06160-y. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
9
Multilevel Quality Improvement Teams: An Alternative Approach for Surgical Academic Training Programs to Meet ACGME Core Competency Milestones.多层次质量改进团队:一种满足 ACGME 核心能力里程碑的外科学术培训计划的替代方法。
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):785-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Implementation of quality improvement skills by primary care teams: case study of a large academic practice.基层医疗团队质量改进技能的实施:大型学术实践案例研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):101-6. doi: 10.1177/2150131913520601. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Core and modifiable components of academic detailing: demonstration of implementation strategy development, tailoring, and documentation process.学术推广的核心及可修改要素:实施策略制定、定制及记录过程的展示
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 3;5:1521504. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1521504. eCollection 2025.
2
Good practices to optimise the performance of maternal and neonatal quality improvement teams: Results from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation in South Africa, before, and during COVID-19.优化孕产妇和新生儿质量改进团队绩效的良好做法:在南非 COVID-19 之前和期间进行的纵向定性评估的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 19;19(11):e0314024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314024. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to the Lean Enterprise Transformation program at the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局精益企业转型项目的促进因素和障碍。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021;46(4):308-318. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000270.
2
Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.国家质量改进计划对提高急诊腹部手术后生存的效果(EPOCH):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2213-2221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32521-2. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.
Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.
虚拟质量改进培训计划对提高大型卫生系统内体重管理计划覆盖范围的效果。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14344. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14344. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Clinician Perceptions on Using Decision Tools to Support Prediction-Based Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening.临床医生对使用决策工具支持基于预测的肺癌筛查共同决策的看法。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 May 20;9(1):23814683241252786. doi: 10.1177/23814683241252786. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
5
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
6
A pragmatic context assessment tool (pCAT): using a Think Aloud method to develop an assessment of contextual barriers to change.一种实用的情境评估工具(pCAT):运用出声思维法来开发对变革情境障碍的评估。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 11;4(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00380-5.
7
Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.一线的持续质量改进:一个跨学科临床团队在完成虚拟学习项目后的四年历程。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 27;6(4):e10345. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10345. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Organizational contexts, implementation process, and capacity outcomes of multicultural, multilingual Home-Based Programs in public initiatives: A Mixed-Methods study.公共倡议中多元文化、多语言家庭计划的组织背景、实施过程和能力结果:一项混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3409-3426. doi: 10.1111/jan.15276. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of implementation strategies to optimize and sustain use of evidence-based practices in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) patients.通过动态调整维持实施(MIDAS):一项集群随机试验的方案,该试验旨在研究实施策略,以优化并维持退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)患者对循证实践的使用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 May 14;3(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00297-z.
10
Implementation of a Web-Based Tool for Shared Decision-making in Lung Cancer Screening: Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Evaluation.基于网络的肺癌筛查共享决策工具的实施:混合方法质量改进评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e32399. doi: 10.2196/32399.
实践轮换对基层医疗质量改进实施的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):16-22. doi: 10.1177/1062860619844001. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory.在七个大型实施干预措施中指定和比较实施策略:理论的实际应用。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 21;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0876-4.
5
Suicide Reduction and Research Efforts in Service Members and Veterans-Sobering Realities.减少现役军人和退伍军人自杀的措施及研究工作——严峻的现实
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;76(5):464-466. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4564.
6
Protocol for evaluating the nationwide implementation of the VA Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Management (STORM).评估 VA 分层工具(STORM)在全国范围内实施的方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0852-z.
7
Comparison of Wait Times for New Patients Between the Private Sector and United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.私营部门和美国退伍军人事务医疗中心新患者等待时间比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096.
8
A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts.面向实施专家的以用户为中心的设计策略词汇表。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1057-1064. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby119.
9
Geographic Variation in Obesity, Behavioral Treatment, and Bariatric Surgery for Veterans.退伍军人肥胖症、行为治疗和减重手术的地域差异。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Jan;27(1):161-165. doi: 10.1002/oby.22350. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
The Phased Implementation of a National Telehealth Weight Management Program for Veterans: Mixed-Methods Program Evaluation.针对退伍军人的全国远程医疗体重管理计划的分阶段实施:混合方法计划评估
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Oct 9;3(3):e14. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.9867.