Possebon Anna Paula da Rosa, Schuster Alessandra Julie, Bielemann Amália Machado, Porto Bruna Leão, Boscato Noéli, Faot Fernanda
School of Dentistry, UFPel - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, UFPel - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2020 Sep 4;31(4):399-403. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003525.
This cross-sectional observational study with 24 patients evaluated differences in bite force (BF) and masticatory performance (MP) between conventional complete denture (CCD) and implant mandibular overdenture (IMO) users and the correlation between these variables. The BF test was performed bilaterally with an occlusal force device. During the MP test, patients were asked to chew Optocal particles for 40 cycles. The Shapiro Wilk test was employed to verify the normality of the data, the student t test to identify differences between groups, and Pearson's correlation to investigate interrelationships between variables. A multiple linear regression was subsequently performed via the stepwise method. P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Unlike IMO users, CCD users presented a significant difference (25.6%) in BF between the dominant and non-dominant chewing side (p=0.04). IMO users presented significantly higher BF (p=0.01) without presenting a dominant side (p=0.38), and also performed significantly better for the following MP parameters: MPX50 values decreased by 27.25% in IMO users (p=0.01), MPB decreased by 48.38% (p=0.01), and ME 5.6 decreased by 53.25% (p=0.02), while ME2.8 increased by 151.57% (p=0.01). The BF and MPX50 in the IMO wearers group were negatively correlated (-0.57; p=0.05); this correlation coefficient was the only parameter included in the multivariate regression model. IMO users have higher BF and better masticatory performance than CCD users, especially in terms of chewed particles size reduction. MP is correlated with a higher BF in IMO users through better particle trituration.
这项横断面观察性研究纳入了24名患者,评估了传统全口义齿(CCD)使用者和种植体下颌覆盖义齿(IMO)使用者之间的咬合力(BF)和咀嚼性能(MP)差异以及这些变量之间的相关性。使用咬合力量装置双侧进行BF测试。在MP测试期间,要求患者咀嚼Optocal颗粒40个周期。采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验来验证数据的正态性,采用学生t检验来识别组间差异,并采用皮尔逊相关性分析来研究变量之间的相互关系。随后通过逐步法进行多元线性回归。P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。与IMO使用者不同,CCD使用者在优势咀嚼侧和非优势咀嚼侧之间的BF存在显著差异(25.6%)(p=0.04)。IMO使用者的BF显著更高(p=0.01),且不存在优势侧(p=0.38),并且在以下MP参数方面表现也显著更好:IMO使用者的MPX50值降低了27.25%(p=0.01),MPB降低了48.38%(p=0.01),ME 5.6降低了53.25%(p=0.02),而ME2.8增加了151.57%(p=0.01)。IMO佩戴者组中的BF和MPX50呈负相关(-0.57;p=0.05);该相关系数是多元回归模型中唯一包含的参数。IMO使用者比CCD使用者具有更高的BF和更好的咀嚼性能,尤其是在减小咀嚼颗粒尺寸方面。通过更好地研磨颗粒,IMO使用者的MP与更高的BF相关。