Nicola Tainá, Weis Alísia Helena
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Sep 7;73(6):e20190545. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0545.
to describe the stages of construction and content validation of an instrument to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops.
this methodological study focused on validating the instrument's content. The instrument developed was assessed by a committee of experts using the Delphi Technique, in two rounds. For the degree of agreement, percentage agreement and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used.
in the first round, six experts participated, and the degree of agreement was 87% for clarity and 94% for representativeness. In the second round, five experts participated, the CVI was 0.95 for clarity, 0.97 for representativeness and 0.96 total CVI. The final instrument had 42 items divided into three chunks.
the instrument has content validity to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops, being a tool for the use of state and municipal administrations.
描述用于评估初级卫生保健规划研讨会的工具的构建阶段和内容效度。
本方法学研究聚焦于验证该工具的内容。所开发的工具由一个专家委员会采用德尔菲技术进行两轮评估。对于一致性程度，使用了百分比一致性和内容效度指数（CVI）。
第一轮有六位专家参与，清晰度方面的一致性程度为87%，代表性方面为94%。第二轮有五位专家参与，清晰度的CVI为0.95，代表性的CVI为0.97，总CVI为0.96。最终工具包含42个项目，分为三个部分。
该工具具有评估初级卫生保健规划研讨会的内容效度，是州和市行政部门可使用的一种工具。
