Cao Shuang, Piao Lingyu
CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, Beijing, 100190, P. R. China.
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, P. R. China.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Oct 12;59(42):18312-18320. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009633. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Over the past decades, various photocatalysts have been developed and great progress has been achieved in the field of solar-driven photocatalytic water splitting. However, the lack of an accurate and comprehensive evaluation method greatly hinders the meaningful comparison between different systems and becomes a serious impediment for the development of photocatalysts. Although many researchers are aware of this, there has been little work in this area. In this Viewpoint, we first analyze the insufficiencies of the existing evaluation methods and then make preliminary suggestions, aiming to stimulate discussion in the research community and hopefully lead to a widely accepted and authoritative evaluation system to assess photocatalyst performance.
在过去几十年里,已开发出各种光催化剂,并且在太阳能驱动的光催化水分解领域取得了巨大进展。然而,缺乏准确而全面的评估方法极大地阻碍了不同体系之间有意义的比较,成为光催化剂发展的严重障碍。尽管许多研究人员意识到了这一点,但该领域的相关工作却很少。在本观点文章中,我们首先分析现有评估方法的不足之处,然后提出初步建议,旨在激发研究界的讨论,并有望形成一个被广泛接受的权威性评估体系来评估光催化剂的性能。