Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Oncol. 2020 Oct;59(10):1157-1163. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1817977. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
The beneficial effects of protons are primarily based on reduction of low to intermediate radiation dose bath to normal tissue surrounding the radiotherapy target volume. Despite promise for reduced long-term toxicity, the percentage of cancer patients treated with proton therapy remains low. This is probably caused by technical improvements in planning and delivery of photon therapy, and by high cost, low availability and lack of high-level evidence on proton therapy. A number of proton treatment facilities are under construction or have recently opened; there are now two operational Scandinavian proton centres and two more are under construction, thereby eliminating the availability hurdle. Even with the advantageous physical properties of protons, there is still substantial ambiguity and no established criteria related to which patients should receive proton therapy. This topic was discussed in a session at the Nordic Collaborative Workshop on Particle Therapy, held in Uppsala 14-15 November 2019. This paper resumes the Nordic-Baltic perspective on proton therapy indications and discusses strategies to identify patients for proton therapy. As for indications, neoplastic entities, target volume localisation, size, internal motion, age, second cancer predisposition, dose escalation and treatment plan comparison based on the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle or normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were discussed. Importantly, the patient selection process should be integrated into the radiotherapy community and emphasis on collaboration across medical specialties, involvement of key decision makers and knowledge dissemination in general are important factors. An active Nordic-Baltic proton therapy organisation would also serve this purpose.
质子治疗的有益效果主要基于减少放疗靶区周围正常组织的低至中等辐射剂量。尽管质子治疗有望降低长期毒性,但接受质子治疗的癌症患者比例仍然很低。这可能是由于光子治疗的计划和交付技术的改进,以及质子治疗的高成本、低可用性和缺乏高级别证据所致。许多质子治疗设施正在建设或最近已经启用;现在有两个运营中的斯堪的纳维亚质子中心,另外两个正在建设中,从而消除了可用性障碍。即使质子具有有利的物理特性,但对于哪些患者应该接受质子治疗,仍然存在很大的不确定性,并且没有确立的标准。这一主题在 2019 年 11 月 14 日至 15 日在乌普萨拉举行的北欧协作粒子治疗研讨会上进行了讨论。本文总结了北欧-波罗的海在质子治疗适应症方面的观点,并讨论了确定质子治疗患者的策略。关于适应症,讨论了肿瘤实体、靶区定位、大小、内部运动、年龄、二次癌症易感性、剂量递增以及基于合理可达到的最低(ALARA)原则或正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型的治疗计划比较。重要的是,患者选择过程应纳入放射治疗社区,并强调跨医学专业的协作、关键决策者的参与以及知识传播是重要因素。积极的北欧-波罗的海质子治疗组织也将为此目的服务。